Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef

The study compared growth and slaughter performance and meat quality of organic beef cattle finished with or without pasture grazing. One group of 10 Limousin heifers was finished under confined conditions and fed ad libitum a total mixed ration based on maize silage, hay and cereal grains. A second...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giulio Cozzi, Marta Brscic, Aziza Boukha, Sandro Tenti, Flaviana Gottardo, Flavio Da Ronch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group
Series:Italian Journal of Animal Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.aspajournal.it/index.php/ijas/article/view/ijas.2010.e77/html_12
id doaj-00fd255ed6f04f4b96adfa02ee003159
record_format Article
spelling doaj-00fd255ed6f04f4b96adfa02ee0031592020-11-25T01:33:50ZengTaylor & Francis GroupItalian Journal of Animal Science1594-40771828-051X94e77Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beefGiulio CozziMarta BrscicAziza BoukhaSandro TentiFlaviana GottardoFlavio Da RonchThe study compared growth and slaughter performance and meat quality of organic beef cattle finished with or without pasture grazing. One group of 10 Limousin heifers was finished under confined conditions and fed ad libitum a total mixed ration based on maize silage, hay and cereal grains. A second group of 10 Limousin heifers rotationally grazed two contiguous pasture plots of 1.5 ha each with a daily supplementation of a concentrate mix based on cereal grains and roasted soybeans. Heifers were slaughtered at commercial finishing and meat quality traits were assessed on Longissimus thoracis muscle. The grazing group, due to a lower average daily gain (0.74 vs. 0.95 kg/day; P<0.05), required a prolonged finishing period (172 vs. 155 days; P<0.05) than the confined animals. Meat samples from grazing cattle were less tender (shear force: 3.92 vs. 3.24 kg/cm2; P<0.05) and showed a lower lightness (L*: 33.0 vs. 35.8; P<0.001) and a higher redness (15.4 vs. 13.7; P<0.01) and yellowness (15.6 vs. 14.6; P<0.05). Fatty acid composition of the intramuscular fat was significantly affected by the finishing system. Grazing heifers had a higher content of polyunsaturated fatty acids (4.06 vs. 3.66% of total fatty acids; P<0.05), conjugated linoleic acids (0.16 vs. 0.10% of total fatty acids; P<0.01) and ω-3 (0.44 vs. 0.30% of total fatty acids; P<0.001) than confined animals. The detrimental effects of pasture grazing on growth performance and on some important meat quality traits explain the limited adoption of this finishing system in organic beef production.http://www.aspajournal.it/index.php/ijas/article/view/ijas.2010.e77/html_12Beef cattleOrganic productionPasture grazingGrowth performanceMeat quality
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Giulio Cozzi
Marta Brscic
Aziza Boukha
Sandro Tenti
Flaviana Gottardo
Flavio Da Ronch
spellingShingle Giulio Cozzi
Marta Brscic
Aziza Boukha
Sandro Tenti
Flaviana Gottardo
Flavio Da Ronch
Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef
Italian Journal of Animal Science
Beef cattle
Organic production
Pasture grazing
Growth performance
Meat quality
author_facet Giulio Cozzi
Marta Brscic
Aziza Boukha
Sandro Tenti
Flaviana Gottardo
Flavio Da Ronch
author_sort Giulio Cozzi
title Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef
title_short Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef
title_full Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef
title_fullStr Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef
title_sort comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Italian Journal of Animal Science
issn 1594-4077
1828-051X
description The study compared growth and slaughter performance and meat quality of organic beef cattle finished with or without pasture grazing. One group of 10 Limousin heifers was finished under confined conditions and fed ad libitum a total mixed ration based on maize silage, hay and cereal grains. A second group of 10 Limousin heifers rotationally grazed two contiguous pasture plots of 1.5 ha each with a daily supplementation of a concentrate mix based on cereal grains and roasted soybeans. Heifers were slaughtered at commercial finishing and meat quality traits were assessed on Longissimus thoracis muscle. The grazing group, due to a lower average daily gain (0.74 vs. 0.95 kg/day; P<0.05), required a prolonged finishing period (172 vs. 155 days; P<0.05) than the confined animals. Meat samples from grazing cattle were less tender (shear force: 3.92 vs. 3.24 kg/cm2; P<0.05) and showed a lower lightness (L*: 33.0 vs. 35.8; P<0.001) and a higher redness (15.4 vs. 13.7; P<0.01) and yellowness (15.6 vs. 14.6; P<0.05). Fatty acid composition of the intramuscular fat was significantly affected by the finishing system. Grazing heifers had a higher content of polyunsaturated fatty acids (4.06 vs. 3.66% of total fatty acids; P<0.05), conjugated linoleic acids (0.16 vs. 0.10% of total fatty acids; P<0.01) and ω-3 (0.44 vs. 0.30% of total fatty acids; P<0.001) than confined animals. The detrimental effects of pasture grazing on growth performance and on some important meat quality traits explain the limited adoption of this finishing system in organic beef production.
topic Beef cattle
Organic production
Pasture grazing
Growth performance
Meat quality
url http://www.aspajournal.it/index.php/ijas/article/view/ijas.2010.e77/html_12
work_keys_str_mv AT giuliocozzi comparisonoftwofeedingfinishingtreatmentsonproductionandqualityoforganicbeef
AT martabrscic comparisonoftwofeedingfinishingtreatmentsonproductionandqualityoforganicbeef
AT azizaboukha comparisonoftwofeedingfinishingtreatmentsonproductionandqualityoforganicbeef
AT sandrotenti comparisonoftwofeedingfinishingtreatmentsonproductionandqualityoforganicbeef
AT flavianagottardo comparisonoftwofeedingfinishingtreatmentsonproductionandqualityoforganicbeef
AT flaviodaronch comparisonoftwofeedingfinishingtreatmentsonproductionandqualityoforganicbeef
_version_ 1725075412249214976