Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef
The study compared growth and slaughter performance and meat quality of organic beef cattle finished with or without pasture grazing. One group of 10 Limousin heifers was finished under confined conditions and fed ad libitum a total mixed ration based on maize silage, hay and cereal grains. A second...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
|
Series: | Italian Journal of Animal Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.aspajournal.it/index.php/ijas/article/view/ijas.2010.e77/html_12 |
id |
doaj-00fd255ed6f04f4b96adfa02ee003159 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-00fd255ed6f04f4b96adfa02ee0031592020-11-25T01:33:50ZengTaylor & Francis GroupItalian Journal of Animal Science1594-40771828-051X94e77Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beefGiulio CozziMarta BrscicAziza BoukhaSandro TentiFlaviana GottardoFlavio Da RonchThe study compared growth and slaughter performance and meat quality of organic beef cattle finished with or without pasture grazing. One group of 10 Limousin heifers was finished under confined conditions and fed ad libitum a total mixed ration based on maize silage, hay and cereal grains. A second group of 10 Limousin heifers rotationally grazed two contiguous pasture plots of 1.5 ha each with a daily supplementation of a concentrate mix based on cereal grains and roasted soybeans. Heifers were slaughtered at commercial finishing and meat quality traits were assessed on Longissimus thoracis muscle. The grazing group, due to a lower average daily gain (0.74 vs. 0.95 kg/day; P<0.05), required a prolonged finishing period (172 vs. 155 days; P<0.05) than the confined animals. Meat samples from grazing cattle were less tender (shear force: 3.92 vs. 3.24 kg/cm2; P<0.05) and showed a lower lightness (L*: 33.0 vs. 35.8; P<0.001) and a higher redness (15.4 vs. 13.7; P<0.01) and yellowness (15.6 vs. 14.6; P<0.05). Fatty acid composition of the intramuscular fat was significantly affected by the finishing system. Grazing heifers had a higher content of polyunsaturated fatty acids (4.06 vs. 3.66% of total fatty acids; P<0.05), conjugated linoleic acids (0.16 vs. 0.10% of total fatty acids; P<0.01) and ω-3 (0.44 vs. 0.30% of total fatty acids; P<0.001) than confined animals. The detrimental effects of pasture grazing on growth performance and on some important meat quality traits explain the limited adoption of this finishing system in organic beef production.http://www.aspajournal.it/index.php/ijas/article/view/ijas.2010.e77/html_12Beef cattleOrganic productionPasture grazingGrowth performanceMeat quality |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Giulio Cozzi Marta Brscic Aziza Boukha Sandro Tenti Flaviana Gottardo Flavio Da Ronch |
spellingShingle |
Giulio Cozzi Marta Brscic Aziza Boukha Sandro Tenti Flaviana Gottardo Flavio Da Ronch Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef Italian Journal of Animal Science Beef cattle Organic production Pasture grazing Growth performance Meat quality |
author_facet |
Giulio Cozzi Marta Brscic Aziza Boukha Sandro Tenti Flaviana Gottardo Flavio Da Ronch |
author_sort |
Giulio Cozzi |
title |
Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef |
title_short |
Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef |
title_full |
Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef |
title_sort |
comparison of two feeding finishing treatments on production and quality of organic beef |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Italian Journal of Animal Science |
issn |
1594-4077 1828-051X |
description |
The study compared growth and slaughter performance and meat quality of organic beef cattle finished with or without pasture grazing. One group of 10 Limousin heifers was finished under confined conditions and fed ad libitum a total mixed ration based on maize silage, hay and cereal grains. A second group of 10 Limousin heifers rotationally grazed two contiguous pasture plots of 1.5 ha each with a daily supplementation of a concentrate mix based on cereal grains and roasted soybeans. Heifers were slaughtered at commercial finishing and meat quality traits were assessed on Longissimus thoracis muscle. The grazing group, due to a lower average daily gain (0.74 vs. 0.95 kg/day; P<0.05), required a prolonged finishing period (172 vs. 155 days; P<0.05) than the confined animals. Meat samples from grazing cattle were less tender (shear force: 3.92 vs. 3.24 kg/cm2; P<0.05) and showed a lower lightness (L*: 33.0 vs. 35.8; P<0.001) and a higher redness (15.4 vs. 13.7; P<0.01) and yellowness (15.6 vs. 14.6; P<0.05). Fatty acid composition of the intramuscular fat was significantly affected by the finishing system. Grazing heifers had a higher content of polyunsaturated fatty acids (4.06 vs. 3.66% of total fatty acids; P<0.05), conjugated linoleic acids (0.16 vs. 0.10% of total fatty acids; P<0.01) and ω-3 (0.44 vs. 0.30% of total fatty acids; P<0.001) than confined animals. The detrimental effects of pasture grazing on growth performance and on some important meat quality traits explain the limited adoption of this finishing system in organic beef production. |
topic |
Beef cattle Organic production Pasture grazing Growth performance Meat quality |
url |
http://www.aspajournal.it/index.php/ijas/article/view/ijas.2010.e77/html_12 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT giuliocozzi comparisonoftwofeedingfinishingtreatmentsonproductionandqualityoforganicbeef AT martabrscic comparisonoftwofeedingfinishingtreatmentsonproductionandqualityoforganicbeef AT azizaboukha comparisonoftwofeedingfinishingtreatmentsonproductionandqualityoforganicbeef AT sandrotenti comparisonoftwofeedingfinishingtreatmentsonproductionandqualityoforganicbeef AT flavianagottardo comparisonoftwofeedingfinishingtreatmentsonproductionandqualityoforganicbeef AT flaviodaronch comparisonoftwofeedingfinishingtreatmentsonproductionandqualityoforganicbeef |
_version_ |
1725075412249214976 |