Co-regulation of metabolic genes is better explained by flux coupling than by network distance.

To what extent can modes of gene regulation be explained by systems-level properties of metabolic networks? Prior studies on co-regulation of metabolic genes have mainly focused on graph-theoretical features of metabolic networks and demonstrated a decreasing level of co-expression with increasing n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Richard A Notebaart, Bas Teusink, Roland J Siezen, Balázs Papp
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2008-01-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/18225949/pdf/?tool=EBI
id doaj-0316424d4d364bb785990bfd9e8271ae
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0316424d4d364bb785990bfd9e8271ae2021-04-21T15:21:03ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582008-01-0141e2610.1371/journal.pcbi.0040026Co-regulation of metabolic genes is better explained by flux coupling than by network distance.Richard A NotebaartBas TeusinkRoland J SiezenBalázs PappTo what extent can modes of gene regulation be explained by systems-level properties of metabolic networks? Prior studies on co-regulation of metabolic genes have mainly focused on graph-theoretical features of metabolic networks and demonstrated a decreasing level of co-expression with increasing network distance, a naïve, but widely used, topological index. Others have suggested that static graph representations can poorly capture dynamic functional associations, e.g., in the form of dependence of metabolic fluxes across genes in the network. Here, we systematically tested the relative importance of metabolic flux coupling and network position on gene co-regulation, using a genome-scale metabolic model of Escherichia coli. After validating the computational method with empirical data on flux correlations, we confirm that genes coupled by their enzymatic fluxes not only show similar expression patterns, but also share transcriptional regulators and frequently reside in the same operon. In contrast, we demonstrate that network distance per se has relatively minor influence on gene co-regulation. Moreover, the type of flux coupling can explain refined properties of the regulatory network that are ignored by simple graph-theoretical indices. Our results underline the importance of studying functional states of cellular networks to define physiologically relevant associations between genes and should stimulate future developments of novel functional genomic tools.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/18225949/pdf/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Richard A Notebaart
Bas Teusink
Roland J Siezen
Balázs Papp
spellingShingle Richard A Notebaart
Bas Teusink
Roland J Siezen
Balázs Papp
Co-regulation of metabolic genes is better explained by flux coupling than by network distance.
PLoS Computational Biology
author_facet Richard A Notebaart
Bas Teusink
Roland J Siezen
Balázs Papp
author_sort Richard A Notebaart
title Co-regulation of metabolic genes is better explained by flux coupling than by network distance.
title_short Co-regulation of metabolic genes is better explained by flux coupling than by network distance.
title_full Co-regulation of metabolic genes is better explained by flux coupling than by network distance.
title_fullStr Co-regulation of metabolic genes is better explained by flux coupling than by network distance.
title_full_unstemmed Co-regulation of metabolic genes is better explained by flux coupling than by network distance.
title_sort co-regulation of metabolic genes is better explained by flux coupling than by network distance.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Computational Biology
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
publishDate 2008-01-01
description To what extent can modes of gene regulation be explained by systems-level properties of metabolic networks? Prior studies on co-regulation of metabolic genes have mainly focused on graph-theoretical features of metabolic networks and demonstrated a decreasing level of co-expression with increasing network distance, a naïve, but widely used, topological index. Others have suggested that static graph representations can poorly capture dynamic functional associations, e.g., in the form of dependence of metabolic fluxes across genes in the network. Here, we systematically tested the relative importance of metabolic flux coupling and network position on gene co-regulation, using a genome-scale metabolic model of Escherichia coli. After validating the computational method with empirical data on flux correlations, we confirm that genes coupled by their enzymatic fluxes not only show similar expression patterns, but also share transcriptional regulators and frequently reside in the same operon. In contrast, we demonstrate that network distance per se has relatively minor influence on gene co-regulation. Moreover, the type of flux coupling can explain refined properties of the regulatory network that are ignored by simple graph-theoretical indices. Our results underline the importance of studying functional states of cellular networks to define physiologically relevant associations between genes and should stimulate future developments of novel functional genomic tools.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/18225949/pdf/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT richardanotebaart coregulationofmetabolicgenesisbetterexplainedbyfluxcouplingthanbynetworkdistance
AT basteusink coregulationofmetabolicgenesisbetterexplainedbyfluxcouplingthanbynetworkdistance
AT rolandjsiezen coregulationofmetabolicgenesisbetterexplainedbyfluxcouplingthanbynetworkdistance
AT balazspapp coregulationofmetabolicgenesisbetterexplainedbyfluxcouplingthanbynetworkdistance
_version_ 1714667347239763968