On the unified analysis of three types of relative clause construction in Japanese, and on the “salient reading” of the internally headed type. A reply to Erlewine & Gould (2016)
In this reply, we argue against two proposals made by Erlewine & Gould (2016), and in favor of the following two theses: [i] Japanese internally headed relative constructions disallow an interpretation that is crucially based on contextual salience, and allow only an interpretation that reflects...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Open Library of Humanities
2018-03-01
|
| Series: | Glossa |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/577 |