Confounding factors in vesicle uptake studies using fluorescent lipophilic membrane dyes

Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) such as exosomes are nanocarriers of proteins, RNAs and DNAs. Isolation of pure sEV populations remains challenging, with reports of protein and lipoprotein contaminants in the isolates. Cellular uptake – a cornerstone for understanding exosome and sEV function –...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kaloyan Takov, Derek M. Yellon, Sean M. Davidson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2017-12-01
Series:Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20013078.2017.1388731
id doaj-06c406ab563c458abe02608e875d8240
record_format Article
spelling doaj-06c406ab563c458abe02608e875d82402020-11-25T02:52:36ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Extracellular Vesicles2001-30782017-12-016110.1080/20013078.2017.13887311388731Confounding factors in vesicle uptake studies using fluorescent lipophilic membrane dyesKaloyan Takov0Derek M. Yellon1Sean M. Davidson2University College LondonUniversity College LondonUniversity College LondonSmall extracellular vesicles (sEVs) such as exosomes are nanocarriers of proteins, RNAs and DNAs. Isolation of pure sEV populations remains challenging, with reports of protein and lipoprotein contaminants in the isolates. Cellular uptake – a cornerstone for understanding exosome and sEV function – is frequently examined using lipophilic dyes such as PKH67 or CellMask to label the vesicles. In this study, we investigated whether contaminants can confound the outcomes from sEV and exosomes uptake experiments. sEVs were isolated from blood plasma of fasted or non-fasted rats as well as from serum-supplemented or serum-free conditioned cell culture medium using size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). Eluent fractions were characterized using nanoparticle tracking, protein and triglyceride assays and immunoassays. SEC fractions were labelled with different lipophilic dyes and cellular uptake was quantified using endothelial cells or primary cardiomyocytes. We report co-isolation of sEVs with apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins. Cellular dye transfer did not correspond to sEV content of the SEC fractions, but was severely affected by lipoprotein and protein content. Overnight fasting of rats decreased lipoprotein content and also decreased dye transfer, while late, sEV-poor/protein-rich fractions demonstrated even greater dye transfer. The potential for dye transfer to occur in the complete absence of sEVs was clearly shown by experiments using staining of sEV-depleted serum or pure protein sample. In conclusion, proteins and lipoproteins can make a substantial contribution to transfer of lipophilic dyes to recipient cells. Considering the likelihood of contamination of sEV and exosome isolates, lipophilic dye staining experiments should be carefully controlled, and conclusions interpreted with caution.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20013078.2017.1388731Exosomesextracellular vesiclesfluorescencelipophilic dyesCellMaskPKH67lipoproteinscontaminantsserum
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kaloyan Takov
Derek M. Yellon
Sean M. Davidson
spellingShingle Kaloyan Takov
Derek M. Yellon
Sean M. Davidson
Confounding factors in vesicle uptake studies using fluorescent lipophilic membrane dyes
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
Exosomes
extracellular vesicles
fluorescence
lipophilic dyes
CellMask
PKH67
lipoproteins
contaminants
serum
author_facet Kaloyan Takov
Derek M. Yellon
Sean M. Davidson
author_sort Kaloyan Takov
title Confounding factors in vesicle uptake studies using fluorescent lipophilic membrane dyes
title_short Confounding factors in vesicle uptake studies using fluorescent lipophilic membrane dyes
title_full Confounding factors in vesicle uptake studies using fluorescent lipophilic membrane dyes
title_fullStr Confounding factors in vesicle uptake studies using fluorescent lipophilic membrane dyes
title_full_unstemmed Confounding factors in vesicle uptake studies using fluorescent lipophilic membrane dyes
title_sort confounding factors in vesicle uptake studies using fluorescent lipophilic membrane dyes
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
issn 2001-3078
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) such as exosomes are nanocarriers of proteins, RNAs and DNAs. Isolation of pure sEV populations remains challenging, with reports of protein and lipoprotein contaminants in the isolates. Cellular uptake – a cornerstone for understanding exosome and sEV function – is frequently examined using lipophilic dyes such as PKH67 or CellMask to label the vesicles. In this study, we investigated whether contaminants can confound the outcomes from sEV and exosomes uptake experiments. sEVs were isolated from blood plasma of fasted or non-fasted rats as well as from serum-supplemented or serum-free conditioned cell culture medium using size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). Eluent fractions were characterized using nanoparticle tracking, protein and triglyceride assays and immunoassays. SEC fractions were labelled with different lipophilic dyes and cellular uptake was quantified using endothelial cells or primary cardiomyocytes. We report co-isolation of sEVs with apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins. Cellular dye transfer did not correspond to sEV content of the SEC fractions, but was severely affected by lipoprotein and protein content. Overnight fasting of rats decreased lipoprotein content and also decreased dye transfer, while late, sEV-poor/protein-rich fractions demonstrated even greater dye transfer. The potential for dye transfer to occur in the complete absence of sEVs was clearly shown by experiments using staining of sEV-depleted serum or pure protein sample. In conclusion, proteins and lipoproteins can make a substantial contribution to transfer of lipophilic dyes to recipient cells. Considering the likelihood of contamination of sEV and exosome isolates, lipophilic dye staining experiments should be carefully controlled, and conclusions interpreted with caution.
topic Exosomes
extracellular vesicles
fluorescence
lipophilic dyes
CellMask
PKH67
lipoproteins
contaminants
serum
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20013078.2017.1388731
work_keys_str_mv AT kaloyantakov confoundingfactorsinvesicleuptakestudiesusingfluorescentlipophilicmembranedyes
AT derekmyellon confoundingfactorsinvesicleuptakestudiesusingfluorescentlipophilicmembranedyes
AT seanmdavidson confoundingfactorsinvesicleuptakestudiesusingfluorescentlipophilicmembranedyes
_version_ 1724728857823543296