DYNAMIC MATHEMATICS SOFTWARE: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PREPARATION OF MATH TEACHER

The results of the pedagogical experiment to clarify the number of dynamic mathematics software, which modern math teacher should know, are described.Quantitative results of the questionnaire survey of math teachers concerning the use of DMS in the learning process are given. Thus, the preferences o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olena V. Semenikhina, Maryna H. Drushliak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Information Technologies and Learning Tools 2015-09-01
Series:Інформаційні технології і засоби навчання
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.iitta.gov.ua/index.php/itlt/article/view/1253
id doaj-071d22849d204df09beef8fc793c2828
record_format Article
spelling doaj-071d22849d204df09beef8fc793c28282021-01-02T02:56:24ZengInstitute of Information Technologies and Learning ToolsІнформаційні технології і засоби навчання2076-81842015-09-014843546800DYNAMIC MATHEMATICS SOFTWARE: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PREPARATION OF MATH TEACHEROlena V. Semenikhina0Maryna H. Drushliak1Сумський державний педагогічний університет імені А. С. Макаренка, м. СумиСумський державний педагогічний університет імені А. С. Макаренка, м. СумиThe results of the pedagogical experiment to clarify the number of dynamic mathematics software, which modern math teacher should know, are described.Quantitative results of the questionnaire survey of math teachers concerning the use of DMS in the learning process are given. Thus, the preferences of the teachers are software Gran and GeoGebra, the preferences of the students are software GeoGebra and MathKit. It is noted that math teachers in determining the number of DMS, which they should know and be able to use in the future, notice 3-5 DMS and students, future math teachers, notice 5-7 DMS. Statistical processing of the results was made based on the sign test. It allowed to justify the conclusion, that the study of 5 DMS is needed, at the significance level of 0.05.http://journal.iitta.gov.ua/index.php/itlt/article/view/1253ПДМпідготовка вчителя математикикомп’ютерний інструментарій вчителя математикикритерій знаківпедагогічний експеримент
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olena V. Semenikhina
Maryna H. Drushliak
spellingShingle Olena V. Semenikhina
Maryna H. Drushliak
DYNAMIC MATHEMATICS SOFTWARE: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PREPARATION OF MATH TEACHER
Інформаційні технології і засоби навчання
ПДМ
підготовка вчителя математики
комп’ютерний інструментарій вчителя математики
критерій знаків
педагогічний експеримент
author_facet Olena V. Semenikhina
Maryna H. Drushliak
author_sort Olena V. Semenikhina
title DYNAMIC MATHEMATICS SOFTWARE: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PREPARATION OF MATH TEACHER
title_short DYNAMIC MATHEMATICS SOFTWARE: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PREPARATION OF MATH TEACHER
title_full DYNAMIC MATHEMATICS SOFTWARE: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PREPARATION OF MATH TEACHER
title_fullStr DYNAMIC MATHEMATICS SOFTWARE: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PREPARATION OF MATH TEACHER
title_full_unstemmed DYNAMIC MATHEMATICS SOFTWARE: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PREPARATION OF MATH TEACHER
title_sort dynamic mathematics software: a quantitative analysis in the context of the preparation of math teacher
publisher Institute of Information Technologies and Learning Tools
series Інформаційні технології і засоби навчання
issn 2076-8184
publishDate 2015-09-01
description The results of the pedagogical experiment to clarify the number of dynamic mathematics software, which modern math teacher should know, are described.Quantitative results of the questionnaire survey of math teachers concerning the use of DMS in the learning process are given. Thus, the preferences of the teachers are software Gran and GeoGebra, the preferences of the students are software GeoGebra and MathKit. It is noted that math teachers in determining the number of DMS, which they should know and be able to use in the future, notice 3-5 DMS and students, future math teachers, notice 5-7 DMS. Statistical processing of the results was made based on the sign test. It allowed to justify the conclusion, that the study of 5 DMS is needed, at the significance level of 0.05.
topic ПДМ
підготовка вчителя математики
комп’ютерний інструментарій вчителя математики
критерій знаків
педагогічний експеримент
url http://journal.iitta.gov.ua/index.php/itlt/article/view/1253
work_keys_str_mv AT olenavsemenikhina dynamicmathematicssoftwareaquantitativeanalysisinthecontextofthepreparationofmathteacher
AT marynahdrushliak dynamicmathematicssoftwareaquantitativeanalysisinthecontextofthepreparationofmathteacher
_version_ 1724361510113771520