DYNAMIC MATHEMATICS SOFTWARE: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PREPARATION OF MATH TEACHER
The results of the pedagogical experiment to clarify the number of dynamic mathematics software, which modern math teacher should know, are described.Quantitative results of the questionnaire survey of math teachers concerning the use of DMS in the learning process are given. Thus, the preferences o...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institute of Information Technologies and Learning Tools
2015-09-01
|
Series: | Інформаційні технології і засоби навчання |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.iitta.gov.ua/index.php/itlt/article/view/1253 |
id |
doaj-071d22849d204df09beef8fc793c2828 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-071d22849d204df09beef8fc793c28282021-01-02T02:56:24ZengInstitute of Information Technologies and Learning ToolsІнформаційні технології і засоби навчання2076-81842015-09-014843546800DYNAMIC MATHEMATICS SOFTWARE: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PREPARATION OF MATH TEACHEROlena V. Semenikhina0Maryna H. Drushliak1Сумський державний педагогічний університет імені А. С. Макаренка, м. СумиСумський державний педагогічний університет імені А. С. Макаренка, м. СумиThe results of the pedagogical experiment to clarify the number of dynamic mathematics software, which modern math teacher should know, are described.Quantitative results of the questionnaire survey of math teachers concerning the use of DMS in the learning process are given. Thus, the preferences of the teachers are software Gran and GeoGebra, the preferences of the students are software GeoGebra and MathKit. It is noted that math teachers in determining the number of DMS, which they should know and be able to use in the future, notice 3-5 DMS and students, future math teachers, notice 5-7 DMS. Statistical processing of the results was made based on the sign test. It allowed to justify the conclusion, that the study of 5 DMS is needed, at the significance level of 0.05.http://journal.iitta.gov.ua/index.php/itlt/article/view/1253ПДМпідготовка вчителя математикикомп’ютерний інструментарій вчителя математикикритерій знаківпедагогічний експеримент |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Olena V. Semenikhina Maryna H. Drushliak |
spellingShingle |
Olena V. Semenikhina Maryna H. Drushliak DYNAMIC MATHEMATICS SOFTWARE: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PREPARATION OF MATH TEACHER Інформаційні технології і засоби навчання ПДМ підготовка вчителя математики комп’ютерний інструментарій вчителя математики критерій знаків педагогічний експеримент |
author_facet |
Olena V. Semenikhina Maryna H. Drushliak |
author_sort |
Olena V. Semenikhina |
title |
DYNAMIC MATHEMATICS SOFTWARE: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PREPARATION OF MATH TEACHER |
title_short |
DYNAMIC MATHEMATICS SOFTWARE: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PREPARATION OF MATH TEACHER |
title_full |
DYNAMIC MATHEMATICS SOFTWARE: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PREPARATION OF MATH TEACHER |
title_fullStr |
DYNAMIC MATHEMATICS SOFTWARE: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PREPARATION OF MATH TEACHER |
title_full_unstemmed |
DYNAMIC MATHEMATICS SOFTWARE: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PREPARATION OF MATH TEACHER |
title_sort |
dynamic mathematics software: a quantitative analysis in the context of the preparation of math teacher |
publisher |
Institute of Information Technologies and Learning Tools |
series |
Інформаційні технології і засоби навчання |
issn |
2076-8184 |
publishDate |
2015-09-01 |
description |
The results of the pedagogical experiment to clarify the number of dynamic mathematics software, which modern math teacher should know, are described.Quantitative results of the questionnaire survey of math teachers concerning the use of DMS in the learning process are given. Thus, the preferences of the teachers are software Gran and GeoGebra, the preferences of the students are software GeoGebra and MathKit. It is noted that math teachers in determining the number of DMS, which they should know and be able to use in the future, notice 3-5 DMS and students, future math teachers, notice 5-7 DMS. Statistical processing of the results was made based on the sign test. It allowed to justify the conclusion, that the study of 5 DMS is needed, at the significance level of 0.05. |
topic |
ПДМ підготовка вчителя математики комп’ютерний інструментарій вчителя математики критерій знаків педагогічний експеримент |
url |
http://journal.iitta.gov.ua/index.php/itlt/article/view/1253 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT olenavsemenikhina dynamicmathematicssoftwareaquantitativeanalysisinthecontextofthepreparationofmathteacher AT marynahdrushliak dynamicmathematicssoftwareaquantitativeanalysisinthecontextofthepreparationofmathteacher |
_version_ |
1724361510113771520 |