Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis
Abstract Background Most meta-analyses in systematic reviews, including Cochrane ones, do not have sufficient statistical power to detect or refute even large intervention effects. This is why a meta-analysis ought to be regarded as an interim analysis on its way towards a required information size....
Main Authors: | Jørn Wetterslev, Janus Christian Jakobsen, Christian Gluud |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-03-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-017-0315-7 |
Similar Items
-
Using Trial Sequential Analysis for estimating the sample sizes of further trials: example using smoking cessation intervention
by: Ravinder Claire, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01) -
Probiotics for Preventing Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis
by: Hong Weng, et al.
Published: (2017-10-01) -
The Effect of Magnesium Intake on Stroke Incidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis
by: Binghao Zhao, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01) -
Assessment of performance of the Gail model for predicting breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
by: Xin Wang, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01) -
Efficacy of Low-Level Laser Therapy for Tinnitus: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
by: Chih-Hao Chen, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)