Optimal VAsopressor TitraTION in patients 65 years and older (OVATION-65): protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomised clinical trial

Introduction Vasodilatory hypotension is common among intensive care unit (ICU) patients; vasopressors are considered standard of care. However, optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) targets for vasopressor titration are unknown. The objective of the Optimal VAsopressor TitraTION in patients 65 years...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sangeeta Mehta, François Lauzier, Emmanuel Charbonney, Michaël Chasse, Marie-Claude Battista, Emilie Belley-Cote, Brian H Cuthbertson, Andreas Laupacis, Alexis F Turgeon, Frédérick D'Aragon, Tina Millen, Laveena Munshi, Sumesh Shah, Alexis Turgeon, David Bellemare, Eve Cloutier, Marjorie Daigle, Stéphanie Grenier, Gabrielle Guilbault, Sydney Miezitis, Rebecca Porteous, Irene Watpool, Karolina Walczak, Frédérick D’Aragon, Charles St-Arnaud, Elaine Carbonneau, Joannie Marchand, Marie-Hélène Masse, Fatna Benettaib, Dounia Boumahni, Marie-Ève Cantin, Ali Ghamraoui, Martine Lebrasseur, Maya Salame, Navjot Kaur, Nicole Marinoff, Guillaume Leblanc, Mary Elizabeth Wilcox, Ruxandra Pinto, Michael Mayette, Marc-André Leclair, Hector Quiroz Martinez, Brian Grondin-Beaudoin, Yannick Poulin, Andrew J E Seely, Édouard Botton, Dian Cohen, Neill K J Adhikari, Neill KJ Adhikari, Lauren Griffith, Scott Halpern, Louise Robert-Petit, Marie-Ève Thibault, François-Michel Boisvert, Lee Hwa Tai, Jean-Luc Parent, Xavier Roucou, Hector Quiroz-Martinez, Line Côté, Marilène Ladouceur, Noémie Turcotte, Andrew Seely, Andre Carlos Amaral, Wael Mohammed, Charles Francoeur, Olivier Costerousse, Isabelle St-Hilaire, Jeffrey Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/11/e037947.full
id doaj-0cacd6fdb8f54f228139a915cadbc18e
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sangeeta Mehta
François Lauzier
Emmanuel Charbonney
Michaël Chasse
Marie-Claude Battista
Emilie Belley-Cote
Brian H Cuthbertson
Andreas Laupacis
Alexis F Turgeon
Frédérick D'Aragon
Tina Millen
Laveena Munshi
Sumesh Shah
Alexis Turgeon
David Bellemare
Eve Cloutier
Marjorie Daigle
Stéphanie Grenier
Gabrielle Guilbault
Sydney Miezitis
Rebecca Porteous
Irene Watpool
Karolina Walczak
Frédérick D’Aragon
Charles St-Arnaud
Elaine Carbonneau
Joannie Marchand
Marie-Hélène Masse
Fatna Benettaib
Dounia Boumahni
Marie-Ève Cantin
Ali Ghamraoui
Martine Lebrasseur
Maya Salame
Navjot Kaur
Nicole Marinoff
Guillaume Leblanc
Mary Elizabeth Wilcox
Ruxandra Pinto
Michael Mayette
Marc-André Leclair
Hector Quiroz Martinez
Brian Grondin-Beaudoin
Yannick Poulin
Andrew J E Seely
Édouard Botton
Dian Cohen
Neill K J Adhikari
Neill KJ Adhikari
Lauren Griffith
Scott Halpern
Louise Robert-Petit
Marie-Ève Thibault
François-Michel Boisvert
Lee Hwa Tai
Jean-Luc Parent
Xavier Roucou
Hector Quiroz-Martinez
Line Côté
Marilène Ladouceur
Noémie Turcotte
Andrew Seely
Andre Carlos Amaral
Wael Mohammed
Charles Francoeur
Olivier Costerousse
Isabelle St-Hilaire
Jeffrey Singh
spellingShingle Sangeeta Mehta
François Lauzier
Emmanuel Charbonney
Michaël Chasse
Marie-Claude Battista
Emilie Belley-Cote
Brian H Cuthbertson
Andreas Laupacis
Alexis F Turgeon
Frédérick D'Aragon
Tina Millen
Laveena Munshi
Sumesh Shah
Alexis Turgeon
David Bellemare
Eve Cloutier
Marjorie Daigle
Stéphanie Grenier
Gabrielle Guilbault
Sydney Miezitis
Rebecca Porteous
Irene Watpool
Karolina Walczak
Frédérick D’Aragon
Charles St-Arnaud
Elaine Carbonneau
Joannie Marchand
Marie-Hélène Masse
Fatna Benettaib
Dounia Boumahni
Marie-Ève Cantin
Ali Ghamraoui
Martine Lebrasseur
Maya Salame
Navjot Kaur
Nicole Marinoff
Guillaume Leblanc
Mary Elizabeth Wilcox
Ruxandra Pinto
Michael Mayette
Marc-André Leclair
Hector Quiroz Martinez
Brian Grondin-Beaudoin
Yannick Poulin
Andrew J E Seely
Édouard Botton
Dian Cohen
Neill K J Adhikari
Neill KJ Adhikari
Lauren Griffith
Scott Halpern
Louise Robert-Petit
Marie-Ève Thibault
François-Michel Boisvert
Lee Hwa Tai
Jean-Luc Parent
Xavier Roucou
Hector Quiroz-Martinez
Line Côté
Marilène Ladouceur
Noémie Turcotte
Andrew Seely
Andre Carlos Amaral
Wael Mohammed
Charles Francoeur
Olivier Costerousse
Isabelle St-Hilaire
Jeffrey Singh
Optimal VAsopressor TitraTION in patients 65 years and older (OVATION-65): protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomised clinical trial
BMJ Open
author_facet Sangeeta Mehta
François Lauzier
Emmanuel Charbonney
Michaël Chasse
Marie-Claude Battista
Emilie Belley-Cote
Brian H Cuthbertson
Andreas Laupacis
Alexis F Turgeon
Frédérick D'Aragon
Tina Millen
Laveena Munshi
Sumesh Shah
Alexis Turgeon
David Bellemare
Eve Cloutier
Marjorie Daigle
Stéphanie Grenier
Gabrielle Guilbault
Sydney Miezitis
Rebecca Porteous
Irene Watpool
Karolina Walczak
Frédérick D’Aragon
Charles St-Arnaud
Elaine Carbonneau
Joannie Marchand
Marie-Hélène Masse
Fatna Benettaib
Dounia Boumahni
Marie-Ève Cantin
Ali Ghamraoui
Martine Lebrasseur
Maya Salame
Navjot Kaur
Nicole Marinoff
Guillaume Leblanc
Mary Elizabeth Wilcox
Ruxandra Pinto
Michael Mayette
Marc-André Leclair
Hector Quiroz Martinez
Brian Grondin-Beaudoin
Yannick Poulin
Andrew J E Seely
Édouard Botton
Dian Cohen
Neill K J Adhikari
Neill KJ Adhikari
Lauren Griffith
Scott Halpern
Louise Robert-Petit
Marie-Ève Thibault
François-Michel Boisvert
Lee Hwa Tai
Jean-Luc Parent
Xavier Roucou
Hector Quiroz-Martinez
Line Côté
Marilène Ladouceur
Noémie Turcotte
Andrew Seely
Andre Carlos Amaral
Wael Mohammed
Charles Francoeur
Olivier Costerousse
Isabelle St-Hilaire
Jeffrey Singh
author_sort Sangeeta Mehta
title Optimal VAsopressor TitraTION in patients 65 years and older (OVATION-65): protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomised clinical trial
title_short Optimal VAsopressor TitraTION in patients 65 years and older (OVATION-65): protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomised clinical trial
title_full Optimal VAsopressor TitraTION in patients 65 years and older (OVATION-65): protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomised clinical trial
title_fullStr Optimal VAsopressor TitraTION in patients 65 years and older (OVATION-65): protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomised clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Optimal VAsopressor TitraTION in patients 65 years and older (OVATION-65): protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomised clinical trial
title_sort optimal vasopressor titration in patients 65 years and older (ovation-65): protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomised clinical trial
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Introduction Vasodilatory hypotension is common among intensive care unit (ICU) patients; vasopressors are considered standard of care. However, optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) targets for vasopressor titration are unknown. The objective of the Optimal VAsopressor TitraTION in patients 65 years and older (OVATION-65) trial is to ascertain the effect of permissive hypotension (vasopressor titration to achieve MAP 60–65 mm Hg) versus usual care on biomarkers of organ injury in hypotensive patients aged ≥65 years.Methods and analysis OVATION-65 is an allocation-concealed randomised trial in 7 Canadian hospitals. Eligible patients are ≥65 years of age, in an ICU with vasodilatory hypotension, receiving vasopressors for ≤12 hours to maintain MAP ≥65 mm Hg during or after adequate fluid resuscitation, and expected to receive vasopressors for ≥6 additional hours. Patients are excluded for any of the following: active treatment for spinal cord or acute brain injury; vasopressors given solely for bleeding, ventricular failure or postcardiopulmonary bypass vasoplegia; withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments expected within 48 hours; death perceived as imminent; previous enrolment in OVATION-65; organ transplant within the last year; receiving extracorporeal life support or lack of physician equipoise. Patients are randomised to permissive hypotension versus usual care for up to 28 days. The primary outcome is high-sensitivity troponin T, a biomarker of cardiac injury, on day 3. Secondary outcomes include biomarkers of injury to other organs (brain, liver, intestine, skeletal muscle); lactate (a biomarker of global tissue dysoxia); resource utilisation; adverse events; mortality (90 days and 6 months) and cognitive function (6 months). Assessors of biomarkers, mortality and cognitive function are blinded to allocation.Ethics and dissemination This protocol has been approved at all sites. Consent is obtained from the eligible patient, the substitute decision-maker if the patient is incapable, or in a deferred fashion where permitted. End-of-grant dissemination plans include presentations, publications and social media platforms and discussion forums.Trial registration number NCT03431181.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/11/e037947.full
work_keys_str_mv AT sangeetamehta optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT francoislauzier optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT emmanuelcharbonney optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT michaelchasse optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT marieclaudebattista optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT emiliebelleycote optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT brianhcuthbertson optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT andreaslaupacis optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT alexisfturgeon optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT frederickdaragon optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT tinamillen optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT laveenamunshi optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT sumeshshah optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT alexisturgeon optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT davidbellemare optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT evecloutier optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT marjoriedaigle optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT stephaniegrenier optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT gabrielleguilbault optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT sydneymiezitis optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT rebeccaporteous optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT irenewatpool optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT karolinawalczak optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT frederickdaragon optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT charlesstarnaud optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT elainecarbonneau optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT joanniemarchand optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT mariehelenemasse optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT fatnabenettaib optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT douniaboumahni optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT marieevecantin optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT alighamraoui optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT martinelebrasseur optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT mayasalame optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT navjotkaur optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT nicolemarinoff optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT guillaumeleblanc optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT maryelizabethwilcox optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT ruxandrapinto optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT michaelmayette optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT marcandreleclair optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT hectorquirozmartinez optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT briangrondinbeaudoin optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT yannickpoulin optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT andrewjeseely optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT edouardbotton optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT diancohen optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT neillkjadhikari optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT neillkjadhikari optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT laurengriffith optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT scotthalpern optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT louiserobertpetit optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT marieevethibault optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT francoismichelboisvert optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT leehwatai optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT jeanlucparent optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT xavierroucou optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT hectorquirozmartinez optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT linecote optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT marileneladouceur optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT noemieturcotte optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT andrewseely optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT andrecarlosamaral optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT waelmohammed optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT charlesfrancoeur optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT oliviercosterousse optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT isabellesthilaire optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT jeffreysingh optimalvasopressortitrationinpatients65yearsandolderovation65protocolandstatisticalanalysisplanforarandomisedclinicaltrial
_version_ 1721359752831696896
spelling doaj-0cacd6fdb8f54f228139a915cadbc18e2021-06-25T12:34:38ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-11-01101110.1136/bmjopen-2020-037947Optimal VAsopressor TitraTION in patients 65 years and older (OVATION-65): protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomised clinical trialSangeeta Mehta0François Lauzier1Emmanuel Charbonney2Michaël Chasse3Marie-Claude Battista4Emilie Belley-Cote5Brian H Cuthbertson6Andreas Laupacis7Alexis F Turgeon8Frédérick D'Aragon9Tina Millen10Laveena MunshiSumesh ShahAlexis TurgeonDavid Bellemare11Eve CloutierMarjorie DaigleStéphanie GrenierGabrielle GuilbaultSydney MiezitisRebecca Porteous12Irene Watpool13Karolina WalczakFrédérick D’Aragon14Charles St-Arnaud15Elaine Carbonneau16Joannie MarchandMarie-Hélène Masse17Fatna BenettaibDounia BoumahniMarie-Ève CantinAli GhamraouiMartine Lebrasseur18Maya SalameNavjot KaurNicole Marinoff19Guillaume Leblanc20Mary Elizabeth Wilcox21Ruxandra Pinto22Michael Mayette23Marc-André Leclair24Hector Quiroz Martinez25Brian Grondin-Beaudoin26Yannick Poulin27Andrew J E Seely28Édouard Botton29Dian Cohen30Neill K J Adhikari31Neill KJ AdhikariLauren GriffithScott Halpern32Louise Robert-PetitMarie-Ève ThibaultFrançois-Michel BoisvertLee Hwa TaiJean-Luc ParentXavier RoucouHector Quiroz-MartinezLine CôtéMarilène LadouceurNoémie TurcotteAndrew Seely33Andre Carlos AmaralWael MohammedCharles FrancoeurOlivier CosterousseIsabelle St-HilaireJeffrey SinghInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaPopulation Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaCentre de recherche, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada6 Critical Care Medicine, Sunnnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 4 Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, CanadaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Universite de Sherbrooke Faculte de Medecine et des Sciences de la Sante, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada1 Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaPopulation Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, CanadaOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada3 Department of Anaesthesiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada Centre de recherche, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, CanadaCentre de recherche, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, CanadaCentre de recherche, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, CanadaCentre de recherche, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaCHU de Québec – Université Laval Research Center, Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit (Trauma-Emergency-Critical Care Medicine), Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, CanadaInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaCentre de recherche, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, CanadaDepartments of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaPatient partners, Sherbrooke, Quebec, CanadaPatient partners, Sherbrooke, Quebec, CanadaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada1US University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine4Departments of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CanadaIntroduction Vasodilatory hypotension is common among intensive care unit (ICU) patients; vasopressors are considered standard of care. However, optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) targets for vasopressor titration are unknown. The objective of the Optimal VAsopressor TitraTION in patients 65 years and older (OVATION-65) trial is to ascertain the effect of permissive hypotension (vasopressor titration to achieve MAP 60–65 mm Hg) versus usual care on biomarkers of organ injury in hypotensive patients aged ≥65 years.Methods and analysis OVATION-65 is an allocation-concealed randomised trial in 7 Canadian hospitals. Eligible patients are ≥65 years of age, in an ICU with vasodilatory hypotension, receiving vasopressors for ≤12 hours to maintain MAP ≥65 mm Hg during or after adequate fluid resuscitation, and expected to receive vasopressors for ≥6 additional hours. Patients are excluded for any of the following: active treatment for spinal cord or acute brain injury; vasopressors given solely for bleeding, ventricular failure or postcardiopulmonary bypass vasoplegia; withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments expected within 48 hours; death perceived as imminent; previous enrolment in OVATION-65; organ transplant within the last year; receiving extracorporeal life support or lack of physician equipoise. Patients are randomised to permissive hypotension versus usual care for up to 28 days. The primary outcome is high-sensitivity troponin T, a biomarker of cardiac injury, on day 3. Secondary outcomes include biomarkers of injury to other organs (brain, liver, intestine, skeletal muscle); lactate (a biomarker of global tissue dysoxia); resource utilisation; adverse events; mortality (90 days and 6 months) and cognitive function (6 months). Assessors of biomarkers, mortality and cognitive function are blinded to allocation.Ethics and dissemination This protocol has been approved at all sites. Consent is obtained from the eligible patient, the substitute decision-maker if the patient is incapable, or in a deferred fashion where permitted. End-of-grant dissemination plans include presentations, publications and social media platforms and discussion forums.Trial registration number NCT03431181.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/11/e037947.full