Re-cognising the political in the pedagogy of media education: the carnival is over

Education should never be reduced to a single subject. A curriculum should never be reduced to a single field, period or academic discipline. Media Education, likewise, has to be committed to a plurality of approaches and fields of interest. It has to deal with the seemingly trite and the unambiguou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Robert Ferguson
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: MedienPädagogik 2008-03-01
Series:MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung
Online Access:https://www.medienpaed.com/article/view/927
id doaj-0f2375e17dff44629a42a38698d7aca9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0f2375e17dff44629a42a38698d7aca92021-06-21T12:12:23ZdeuMedienPädagogikMedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung1424-36362008-03-017Jahrbuch Medienpädagogik927Re-cognising the political in the pedagogy of media education: the carnival is overRobert FergusonEducation should never be reduced to a single subject. A curriculum should never be reduced to a single field, period or academic discipline. Media Education, likewise, has to be committed to a plurality of approaches and fields of interest. It has to deal with the seemingly trite and the unambiguously significant, whether in relation to fashion, history, science, religion, national and personal identities, gender, age, ethnicity, class and a myriad of other fields of representation. It has also to allow for the critical exploration of the relationships between representation and lived existence. Media Education, initially, has to be about the way things are, the way things are represented, and how the ways in which things are represented have an impact on the way things are. It is a process which requires at least two conditions to be met. The first is that those engaged with Media Education, whether as students, researchers or teachers have to undergo a constant, demanding and open-ended period of skill acquisition, of intellectual development and a willingness to doubt and to act in the world. The second condition is that all involved in Media Education have to recognise and accept that we inhabit a fragile, delightful, horrific, challenging, beautiful, ugly, insecure, contradictory world, and it is the only one we have. That, at least, is a beginning. Acceptance of these conditions does not sit comfortably beside the bureaucratisation of education and the managerialism which sustains the bureaucracy. But these two conditions are, to adopt the language of the planner, prerequisites.https://www.medienpaed.com/article/view/927
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Robert Ferguson
spellingShingle Robert Ferguson
Re-cognising the political in the pedagogy of media education: the carnival is over
MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung
author_facet Robert Ferguson
author_sort Robert Ferguson
title Re-cognising the political in the pedagogy of media education: the carnival is over
title_short Re-cognising the political in the pedagogy of media education: the carnival is over
title_full Re-cognising the political in the pedagogy of media education: the carnival is over
title_fullStr Re-cognising the political in the pedagogy of media education: the carnival is over
title_full_unstemmed Re-cognising the political in the pedagogy of media education: the carnival is over
title_sort re-cognising the political in the pedagogy of media education: the carnival is over
publisher MedienPädagogik
series MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung
issn 1424-3636
publishDate 2008-03-01
description Education should never be reduced to a single subject. A curriculum should never be reduced to a single field, period or academic discipline. Media Education, likewise, has to be committed to a plurality of approaches and fields of interest. It has to deal with the seemingly trite and the unambiguously significant, whether in relation to fashion, history, science, religion, national and personal identities, gender, age, ethnicity, class and a myriad of other fields of representation. It has also to allow for the critical exploration of the relationships between representation and lived existence. Media Education, initially, has to be about the way things are, the way things are represented, and how the ways in which things are represented have an impact on the way things are. It is a process which requires at least two conditions to be met. The first is that those engaged with Media Education, whether as students, researchers or teachers have to undergo a constant, demanding and open-ended period of skill acquisition, of intellectual development and a willingness to doubt and to act in the world. The second condition is that all involved in Media Education have to recognise and accept that we inhabit a fragile, delightful, horrific, challenging, beautiful, ugly, insecure, contradictory world, and it is the only one we have. That, at least, is a beginning. Acceptance of these conditions does not sit comfortably beside the bureaucratisation of education and the managerialism which sustains the bureaucracy. But these two conditions are, to adopt the language of the planner, prerequisites.
url https://www.medienpaed.com/article/view/927
work_keys_str_mv AT robertferguson recognisingthepoliticalinthepedagogyofmediaeducationthecarnivalisover
_version_ 1721368364573523968