Multidimensional Screening with Complementary Activities: Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Cost and Unknown Preference for Empire Building

We study the optimal regulation of a monopolist when intrinsic efficiency (intrinsic cost) and empire building tendency (marginal utility of output) are private information, but actual cost (the difference between intrinsic cost and effort level) is observable. This is a problem of multidimensional...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Didier Laussel, Ana Pinto Borges, João Correia-da-Silva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2013-09-01
Series:Games
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/4/3/532
id doaj-142a844bd2d74c49bca733df719bbf12
record_format Article
spelling doaj-142a844bd2d74c49bca733df719bbf122020-11-25T01:06:38ZengMDPI AGGames2073-43362013-09-014353256010.3390/g4030532Multidimensional Screening with Complementary Activities: Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Cost and Unknown Preference for Empire BuildingDidier LausselAna Pinto BorgesJoão Correia-da-SilvaWe study the optimal regulation of a monopolist when intrinsic efficiency (intrinsic cost) and empire building tendency (marginal utility of output) are private information, but actual cost (the difference between intrinsic cost and effort level) is observable. This is a problem of multidimensional screening with complementary activities. Results are not only driven by the prior probabilities of the four possible types, but also by the relative magnitude of the uncertainty along the two dimensions of private information. If the marginal utility of output varies much more (less) across managers than the intrinsic marginal cost, there is empire building (efficiency) dominance. In that case, an inefficient empire builder produces more (less) and at lower (higher) marginal cost than an efficient money-seeker. It is only when variabilities are similar that there may be the natural ranking of activities (empire builders produce more, while efficient managers produce at a lower cost).http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/4/3/532multidimensional screeningregulationprocurementempire buildingadverse selection
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Didier Laussel
Ana Pinto Borges
João Correia-da-Silva
spellingShingle Didier Laussel
Ana Pinto Borges
João Correia-da-Silva
Multidimensional Screening with Complementary Activities: Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Cost and Unknown Preference for Empire Building
Games
multidimensional screening
regulation
procurement
empire building
adverse selection
author_facet Didier Laussel
Ana Pinto Borges
João Correia-da-Silva
author_sort Didier Laussel
title Multidimensional Screening with Complementary Activities: Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Cost and Unknown Preference for Empire Building
title_short Multidimensional Screening with Complementary Activities: Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Cost and Unknown Preference for Empire Building
title_full Multidimensional Screening with Complementary Activities: Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Cost and Unknown Preference for Empire Building
title_fullStr Multidimensional Screening with Complementary Activities: Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Cost and Unknown Preference for Empire Building
title_full_unstemmed Multidimensional Screening with Complementary Activities: Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Cost and Unknown Preference for Empire Building
title_sort multidimensional screening with complementary activities: regulating a monopolist with unknown cost and unknown preference for empire building
publisher MDPI AG
series Games
issn 2073-4336
publishDate 2013-09-01
description We study the optimal regulation of a monopolist when intrinsic efficiency (intrinsic cost) and empire building tendency (marginal utility of output) are private information, but actual cost (the difference between intrinsic cost and effort level) is observable. This is a problem of multidimensional screening with complementary activities. Results are not only driven by the prior probabilities of the four possible types, but also by the relative magnitude of the uncertainty along the two dimensions of private information. If the marginal utility of output varies much more (less) across managers than the intrinsic marginal cost, there is empire building (efficiency) dominance. In that case, an inefficient empire builder produces more (less) and at lower (higher) marginal cost than an efficient money-seeker. It is only when variabilities are similar that there may be the natural ranking of activities (empire builders produce more, while efficient managers produce at a lower cost).
topic multidimensional screening
regulation
procurement
empire building
adverse selection
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/4/3/532
work_keys_str_mv AT didierlaussel multidimensionalscreeningwithcomplementaryactivitiesregulatingamonopolistwithunknowncostandunknownpreferenceforempirebuilding
AT anapintoborges multidimensionalscreeningwithcomplementaryactivitiesregulatingamonopolistwithunknowncostandunknownpreferenceforempirebuilding
AT joaocorreiadasilva multidimensionalscreeningwithcomplementaryactivitiesregulatingamonopolistwithunknowncostandunknownpreferenceforempirebuilding
_version_ 1725189034824695808