Benefits of Dominance over Additive Models for the Estimation of Average Effects in the Presence of Dominance

In quantitative genetics, the average effect at a single locus can be estimated by an additive (A) model, or an additive plus dominance (AD) model. In the presence of dominance, the AD-model is expected to be more accurate, because the A-model falsely assumes that residuals are independent and ident...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pascal Duenk, Mario P. L. Calus, Yvonne C. J. Wientjes, Piter Bijma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2017-10-01
Series:G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://g3journal.org/lookup/doi/10.1534/g3.117.300113
id doaj-14ac527078fb46c980bf52ad78a9f4ae
record_format Article
spelling doaj-14ac527078fb46c980bf52ad78a9f4ae2021-07-02T09:33:13ZengOxford University PressG3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics2160-18362017-10-017103405341410.1534/g3.117.30011316Benefits of Dominance over Additive Models for the Estimation of Average Effects in the Presence of DominancePascal DuenkMario P. L. CalusYvonne C. J. WientjesPiter BijmaIn quantitative genetics, the average effect at a single locus can be estimated by an additive (A) model, or an additive plus dominance (AD) model. In the presence of dominance, the AD-model is expected to be more accurate, because the A-model falsely assumes that residuals are independent and identically distributed. Our objective was to investigate the accuracy of an estimated average effect (α^ ) in the presence of dominance, using either a single locus A-model or AD-model. Estimation was based on a finite sample from a large population in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE), and the root mean squared error of α^ was calculated for several broad-sense heritabilities, sample sizes, and sizes of the dominance effect. Results show that with the A-model, both sampling deviations of genotype frequencies from HWE frequencies and sampling deviations of allele frequencies contributed to the error. With the AD-model, only sampling deviations of allele frequencies contributed to the error, provided that all three genotype classes were sampled. In the presence of dominance, the root mean squared error of α^ with the AD-model was always smaller than with the A-model, even when the heritability was less than one. Remarkably, in the absence of dominance, there was no disadvantage of fitting dominance. In conclusion, the AD-model yields more accurate estimates of average effects from a finite sample, because it is more robust against sampling deviations from HWE frequencies than the A-model. Genetic models that include dominance, therefore, yield higher accuracies of estimated average effects than purely additive models when dominance is present.http://g3journal.org/lookup/doi/10.1534/g3.117.300113dominanceHardy-Weinberg equilibriumaverage effectroot mean squared erroraccuracy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pascal Duenk
Mario P. L. Calus
Yvonne C. J. Wientjes
Piter Bijma
spellingShingle Pascal Duenk
Mario P. L. Calus
Yvonne C. J. Wientjes
Piter Bijma
Benefits of Dominance over Additive Models for the Estimation of Average Effects in the Presence of Dominance
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
dominance
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
average effect
root mean squared error
accuracy
author_facet Pascal Duenk
Mario P. L. Calus
Yvonne C. J. Wientjes
Piter Bijma
author_sort Pascal Duenk
title Benefits of Dominance over Additive Models for the Estimation of Average Effects in the Presence of Dominance
title_short Benefits of Dominance over Additive Models for the Estimation of Average Effects in the Presence of Dominance
title_full Benefits of Dominance over Additive Models for the Estimation of Average Effects in the Presence of Dominance
title_fullStr Benefits of Dominance over Additive Models for the Estimation of Average Effects in the Presence of Dominance
title_full_unstemmed Benefits of Dominance over Additive Models for the Estimation of Average Effects in the Presence of Dominance
title_sort benefits of dominance over additive models for the estimation of average effects in the presence of dominance
publisher Oxford University Press
series G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
issn 2160-1836
publishDate 2017-10-01
description In quantitative genetics, the average effect at a single locus can be estimated by an additive (A) model, or an additive plus dominance (AD) model. In the presence of dominance, the AD-model is expected to be more accurate, because the A-model falsely assumes that residuals are independent and identically distributed. Our objective was to investigate the accuracy of an estimated average effect (α^ ) in the presence of dominance, using either a single locus A-model or AD-model. Estimation was based on a finite sample from a large population in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE), and the root mean squared error of α^ was calculated for several broad-sense heritabilities, sample sizes, and sizes of the dominance effect. Results show that with the A-model, both sampling deviations of genotype frequencies from HWE frequencies and sampling deviations of allele frequencies contributed to the error. With the AD-model, only sampling deviations of allele frequencies contributed to the error, provided that all three genotype classes were sampled. In the presence of dominance, the root mean squared error of α^ with the AD-model was always smaller than with the A-model, even when the heritability was less than one. Remarkably, in the absence of dominance, there was no disadvantage of fitting dominance. In conclusion, the AD-model yields more accurate estimates of average effects from a finite sample, because it is more robust against sampling deviations from HWE frequencies than the A-model. Genetic models that include dominance, therefore, yield higher accuracies of estimated average effects than purely additive models when dominance is present.
topic dominance
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
average effect
root mean squared error
accuracy
url http://g3journal.org/lookup/doi/10.1534/g3.117.300113
work_keys_str_mv AT pascalduenk benefitsofdominanceoveradditivemodelsfortheestimationofaverageeffectsinthepresenceofdominance
AT marioplcalus benefitsofdominanceoveradditivemodelsfortheestimationofaverageeffectsinthepresenceofdominance
AT yvonnecjwientjes benefitsofdominanceoveradditivemodelsfortheestimationofaverageeffectsinthepresenceofdominance
AT piterbijma benefitsofdominanceoveradditivemodelsfortheestimationofaverageeffectsinthepresenceofdominance
_version_ 1721332943682535424