Unconscionable: how the U.S. Supreme Court’s jurisprudence lags behind the world when it comes to contraception and conscience

Unconscionable: how the U.S. Supreme Court’s jurisprudence lags behind the world when it comes to contraception and conscience

Abstract U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence undermines access to contraception by permitting individuals, institutions, and even corporations to claim religious objections to ensuring contraceptive insurance coverage, thus imposing those beliefs on non-adherents and jeopardizing their access to essent...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aram A. Schvey, Claire Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-03-01
Series:Contraception and Reproductive Medicine
Subjects:
Conscience
Conscientious objection
Constitution
Contraception
First Amendment
Hobby Lobby
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40834-018-0055-z

Internet

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40834-018-0055-z

Similar Items