Organisational approaches to the 'professionalisation' agenda: planning the provision of the new ITE qualifications for the FE sector

Situated within the context of policy change in the Lifelong Learning Sector, this article is based on the LONCETT (London Centre for Excellence in Teacher Training) research strand exploring organisational responses to policy challenges and the impacts on the delivery of Initial Teacher Education (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Broad, Janet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Huddersfield Press 2010-01-01
Series:Teaching in Lifelong Learning: A Journal to Inform and Improve Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.5920/till.2010.2123
id doaj-1a34ae366d014d5a9ead9c837867dfe5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1a34ae366d014d5a9ead9c837867dfe52020-11-24T21:54:56ZengUniversity of Huddersfield PressTeaching in Lifelong Learning: A Journal to Inform and Improve Practice2049-41812040-09932010-01-0121233410.5920/till.2010.2123Organisational approaches to the 'professionalisation' agenda: planning the provision of the new ITE qualifications for the FE sectorBroad, JanetSituated within the context of policy change in the Lifelong Learning Sector, this article is based on the LONCETT (London Centre for Excellence in Teacher Training) research strand exploring organisational responses to policy challenges and the impacts on the delivery of Initial Teacher Education (ITE) for the sector. It builds on and further develops three themes reported in year one (Wooding, 2007): impact of the new requirements for QTLS/ATLS; impact on delivery patterns and organisational collaboration; and organisational responses to existing staff first employed prior to 2007. Findings suggest a positive view of the new qualifications in terms of enhancement of teachers’ professional standing. Nevertheless, the introduction of three levels of qualification: preparing to teach, certificate, and diploma in teaching have caused confusion, especially in light of the proliferation of job specifications, titles and practices within Further Education (FE) noted by Gleeson, Davies and Wheeler (2005).http://dx.doi.org/10.5920/till.2010.2123
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Broad, Janet
spellingShingle Broad, Janet
Organisational approaches to the 'professionalisation' agenda: planning the provision of the new ITE qualifications for the FE sector
Teaching in Lifelong Learning: A Journal to Inform and Improve Practice
author_facet Broad, Janet
author_sort Broad, Janet
title Organisational approaches to the 'professionalisation' agenda: planning the provision of the new ITE qualifications for the FE sector
title_short Organisational approaches to the 'professionalisation' agenda: planning the provision of the new ITE qualifications for the FE sector
title_full Organisational approaches to the 'professionalisation' agenda: planning the provision of the new ITE qualifications for the FE sector
title_fullStr Organisational approaches to the 'professionalisation' agenda: planning the provision of the new ITE qualifications for the FE sector
title_full_unstemmed Organisational approaches to the 'professionalisation' agenda: planning the provision of the new ITE qualifications for the FE sector
title_sort organisational approaches to the 'professionalisation' agenda: planning the provision of the new ite qualifications for the fe sector
publisher University of Huddersfield Press
series Teaching in Lifelong Learning: A Journal to Inform and Improve Practice
issn 2049-4181
2040-0993
publishDate 2010-01-01
description Situated within the context of policy change in the Lifelong Learning Sector, this article is based on the LONCETT (London Centre for Excellence in Teacher Training) research strand exploring organisational responses to policy challenges and the impacts on the delivery of Initial Teacher Education (ITE) for the sector. It builds on and further develops three themes reported in year one (Wooding, 2007): impact of the new requirements for QTLS/ATLS; impact on delivery patterns and organisational collaboration; and organisational responses to existing staff first employed prior to 2007. Findings suggest a positive view of the new qualifications in terms of enhancement of teachers’ professional standing. Nevertheless, the introduction of three levels of qualification: preparing to teach, certificate, and diploma in teaching have caused confusion, especially in light of the proliferation of job specifications, titles and practices within Further Education (FE) noted by Gleeson, Davies and Wheeler (2005).
url http://dx.doi.org/10.5920/till.2010.2123
work_keys_str_mv AT broadjanet organisationalapproachestotheprofessionalisationagendaplanningtheprovisionofthenewitequalificationsforthefesector
_version_ 1725864766562369536