The Paradox Of Proof And Scientific Expertise

In this paper I criticize the current standards for the acceptability of expert testimony in current US legislation. The standards have been the subject of much academic literature after the Frye and Daubert cases. I expose what I call the Paradox of Proof, and argue that the historical and current...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Carlo Martini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associazione Culturale Humana.Mente 2015-05-01
Series:Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/78