Brazil nut sorting for aflatoxin prevention: a comparison between automatic and manual shelling methods

The impact of automatic and manual shelling methods during manual/visual sorting of different batches of Brazil nuts from the 2010 and 2011 harvests was evaluated in order to investigate aflatoxin prevention.The samples were tested as follows: in-shell, shell, shelled, and pieces in order to evaluat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ariane Mendonça Pacheco, Maristela Martins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos 2013-06-01
Series:Food Science and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000200023
id doaj-213238eb8c434c219a2429885d40b816
record_format Article
spelling doaj-213238eb8c434c219a2429885d40b8162020-11-24T22:30:31ZengSociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de AlimentosFood Science and Technology0101-20611678-457X2013-06-01332369375Brazil nut sorting for aflatoxin prevention: a comparison between automatic and manual shelling methodsAriane Mendonça PachecoMaristela MartinsThe impact of automatic and manual shelling methods during manual/visual sorting of different batches of Brazil nuts from the 2010 and 2011 harvests was evaluated in order to investigate aflatoxin prevention.The samples were tested as follows: in-shell, shell, shelled, and pieces in order to evaluate the moisture content (mc), water activity (Aw), and total aflatoxin (LOD = 0.3 µg/kg and LOQ 0.85 µg/kg) at the Brazil nut processing plant. The results of aflatoxins obtained for the manually shelled nut samples ranged from 3.0 to 60.3 µg/g and from 2.0 to 31.0 µg/g for the automatically shelled samples. All samples showed levels of mc below the limit of 15%; on the other hand, shelled samples from both harvests showed levels of Aw above the limit. There were no significant differences concerning the manual or automatic shelling results during the sorting stages. On the other hand, the visual sorting was effective in decreasing the aflatoxin contamination in both methods.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000200023Bertholletiawater activitymoisture
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ariane Mendonça Pacheco
Maristela Martins
spellingShingle Ariane Mendonça Pacheco
Maristela Martins
Brazil nut sorting for aflatoxin prevention: a comparison between automatic and manual shelling methods
Food Science and Technology
Bertholletia
water activity
moisture
author_facet Ariane Mendonça Pacheco
Maristela Martins
author_sort Ariane Mendonça Pacheco
title Brazil nut sorting for aflatoxin prevention: a comparison between automatic and manual shelling methods
title_short Brazil nut sorting for aflatoxin prevention: a comparison between automatic and manual shelling methods
title_full Brazil nut sorting for aflatoxin prevention: a comparison between automatic and manual shelling methods
title_fullStr Brazil nut sorting for aflatoxin prevention: a comparison between automatic and manual shelling methods
title_full_unstemmed Brazil nut sorting for aflatoxin prevention: a comparison between automatic and manual shelling methods
title_sort brazil nut sorting for aflatoxin prevention: a comparison between automatic and manual shelling methods
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos
series Food Science and Technology
issn 0101-2061
1678-457X
publishDate 2013-06-01
description The impact of automatic and manual shelling methods during manual/visual sorting of different batches of Brazil nuts from the 2010 and 2011 harvests was evaluated in order to investigate aflatoxin prevention.The samples were tested as follows: in-shell, shell, shelled, and pieces in order to evaluate the moisture content (mc), water activity (Aw), and total aflatoxin (LOD = 0.3 µg/kg and LOQ 0.85 µg/kg) at the Brazil nut processing plant. The results of aflatoxins obtained for the manually shelled nut samples ranged from 3.0 to 60.3 µg/g and from 2.0 to 31.0 µg/g for the automatically shelled samples. All samples showed levels of mc below the limit of 15%; on the other hand, shelled samples from both harvests showed levels of Aw above the limit. There were no significant differences concerning the manual or automatic shelling results during the sorting stages. On the other hand, the visual sorting was effective in decreasing the aflatoxin contamination in both methods.
topic Bertholletia
water activity
moisture
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000200023
work_keys_str_mv AT arianemendoncapacheco brazilnutsortingforaflatoxinpreventionacomparisonbetweenautomaticandmanualshellingmethods
AT maristelamartins brazilnutsortingforaflatoxinpreventionacomparisonbetweenautomaticandmanualshellingmethods
_version_ 1725740484674977792