A prospective study on an innovative online forum for peer reviewing of surgical science.

Peer review is important to the scientific process. However, the present system has been criticised and accused of bias, lack of transparency, failure to detect significant breakthrough and error. At the British Journal of Surgery (BJS), after surveying authors' and reviewers' opinions on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martin Almquist, Regula S von Allmen, Dan Carradice, Steven J Oosterling, Kirsty McFarlane, Bas Wijnhoven
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5491000?pdf=render