Nuclear stress perfusion imaging versus computed tomography coronary angiography for identifying patients with obstructive coronary artery disease as defined by conventional angiography: insights from the CorE-64 multicenter study

Nuclear stress perfusion imaging versus computed tomography coronary angiography for identifying patients with obstructive coronary artery disease as defined by conventional angiography: insights from the CorE-64 multicenter study

We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography (CTA) versus myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) as defined by conventional quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). Sixty-three patients who were enrolled in the CorE-64...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yutaka Tanami, Julie M. Miller, Andrea L. Vavere, Carlos E. Rochitte, Marc Dewey, Hiroyuki Niinuma, Melvin E. Clouse, Christopher Cox, Jeffrey Brinker, Joao A. C. Lima, Armin Arbab-Zadeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Touch Medical Media 2014-08-01
Series:Heart International
Subjects:
Cardiac computed tomography
Myocardial ischemia
Myocardial perfusion imaging
Online Access:http://www.heart-int.com/article/nuclear-stress-perfusion-imaging-versus-computed-tomography-coronary-angiography-for-identifying-patients-with-obstructive-coronary-artery-disease-as-

Internet

http://www.heart-int.com/article/nuclear-stress-perfusion-imaging-versus-computed-tomography-coronary-angiography-for-identifying-patients-with-obstructive-coronary-artery-disease-as-

Similar Items