Classroom argumentation in a physical knowledge class for eight to ten years old students

This paper is concerned with the study of the argumentation of eight to ten years old students in a physical knowledge class. The analysis was carried out from the structural point of view, through the identification of the components present in isolated arguments, as well as looking for different i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Maria Pessoa de Carvalho, Maria Candida Varone de Morais Capecchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul 2000-05-01
Series:Investigações em Ensino de Ciências
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.if.ufrgs.br/ienci/artigos/Artigo_ID63/v5_n3_a2000.pdf
id doaj-2a520e7a745c4321a6d644a63275b8ae
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a520e7a745c4321a6d644a63275b8ae2020-11-24T22:41:52ZengUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Investigações em Ensino de Ciências1518-87952000-05-0153171189Classroom argumentation in a physical knowledge class for eight to ten years old studentsAnna Maria Pessoa de CarvalhoMaria Candida Varone de Morais CapecchiThis paper is concerned with the study of the argumentation of eight to ten years old students in a physical knowledge class. The analysis was carried out from the structural point of view, through the identification of the components present in isolated arguments, as well as looking for different ideas and searching for syntheses in the argumentation as a whole. It was also observed in which way the teacher conducted the discussion and a IRF discursive standard mainly elucidative was identified. This kind of discourse provided a cooperative space for the externalization of ideas, which allowed at the same time the respect for alternative explanations and the selfconfidence regarding of complementary arguments. Besides presenting many statements in their justifications, relating them to the data they gathered, students stated hypotheses from their conclusions and the proposed problem stimulated them not only to solve it but to try alternative solutions as well.http://www.if.ufrgs.br/ienci/artigos/Artigo_ID63/v5_n3_a2000.pdfclassroom argumentationphysical knowledgeelementary school
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anna Maria Pessoa de Carvalho
Maria Candida Varone de Morais Capecchi
spellingShingle Anna Maria Pessoa de Carvalho
Maria Candida Varone de Morais Capecchi
Classroom argumentation in a physical knowledge class for eight to ten years old students
Investigações em Ensino de Ciências
classroom argumentation
physical knowledge
elementary school
author_facet Anna Maria Pessoa de Carvalho
Maria Candida Varone de Morais Capecchi
author_sort Anna Maria Pessoa de Carvalho
title Classroom argumentation in a physical knowledge class for eight to ten years old students
title_short Classroom argumentation in a physical knowledge class for eight to ten years old students
title_full Classroom argumentation in a physical knowledge class for eight to ten years old students
title_fullStr Classroom argumentation in a physical knowledge class for eight to ten years old students
title_full_unstemmed Classroom argumentation in a physical knowledge class for eight to ten years old students
title_sort classroom argumentation in a physical knowledge class for eight to ten years old students
publisher Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
series Investigações em Ensino de Ciências
issn 1518-8795
publishDate 2000-05-01
description This paper is concerned with the study of the argumentation of eight to ten years old students in a physical knowledge class. The analysis was carried out from the structural point of view, through the identification of the components present in isolated arguments, as well as looking for different ideas and searching for syntheses in the argumentation as a whole. It was also observed in which way the teacher conducted the discussion and a IRF discursive standard mainly elucidative was identified. This kind of discourse provided a cooperative space for the externalization of ideas, which allowed at the same time the respect for alternative explanations and the selfconfidence regarding of complementary arguments. Besides presenting many statements in their justifications, relating them to the data they gathered, students stated hypotheses from their conclusions and the proposed problem stimulated them not only to solve it but to try alternative solutions as well.
topic classroom argumentation
physical knowledge
elementary school
url http://www.if.ufrgs.br/ienci/artigos/Artigo_ID63/v5_n3_a2000.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT annamariapessoadecarvalho classroomargumentationinaphysicalknowledgeclassforeighttotenyearsoldstudents
AT mariacandidavaronedemoraiscapecchi classroomargumentationinaphysicalknowledgeclassforeighttotenyearsoldstudents
_version_ 1725700507900575744