Smokers’ perceptions of different classes of cigarette brand descriptors

• Main Authors: Nicholas J. Felcione, Kaila J. Norton, Maansi Bansal-Travers, Vaughan W. Rees, K. Michael Cummings, Richard J. O'Connor
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: European Publishing 2021-02-01
• Series: Tobacco Prevention and Cessation
• Subjects: tobacco; packaging; perceptions; cigarette; brand descriptors
• Online Access: http://www.tobaccopreventioncessation.com/Smokers-perceptions-of-different-classes-of-cigarette-brand-descriptors,131243,0,2.html

Introduction Cigarette brand descriptors such as ‘light’ are banned in several countries and often replaced by alternative descriptors that continue to mislead smokers about the relative risk from those brands. The objective of this study was to evaluate perceptions from current brand descriptors when presented independently of cigarette packaging. Methods Eighty-eight daily cigarette smokers attended semi-structured interviews at three US research laboratories in 2018–2019 to assess smokers’ perceptions of cigarette brand descriptors in four classes of brand features: prestige, connotation, taste, and color. Participants ranked descriptors within each brand feature on perceived harm, attractiveness, and appeal (willingness to try). Ranked perceptions were described using median rankings and percentages. Chi-squared was used to assess demographic effects on perceptions. Spearman’s correlation was used to assess the association between harm, attractiveness, and appeal rankings. Results Brand descriptors influenced perceptions of harm, attractiveness, and appeal within each brand feature. Smooth was perceived as the most attractive (42.5%) and appealing (33.0%) taste descriptor. Red was perceived as the most harmful (45.4%) and least appealing (22.7%) color descriptor. Perceptions of certain descriptors differed by demographic characteristics such as sex and age. Rankings of attractiveness and appeal were more strongly correlated (r=0.63) than rankings of harm and appeal (r=0.20, p<0.01). Conclusions Cigarette manufacturers replaced banned descriptors with alternative descriptors that continue to influence perceptions of cigarettes. Regulatory agencies should closely evaluate all brand descriptors and consider implications for alternative products with fewer regulations.