Evaluation of GeneXpert PA assay compared to genomic and (semi-)quantitative culture methods for direct detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in endotracheal aspirates

Abstract Introduction Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a common cause of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Rapid and accurate detection of lower respiratory tract colonization and/or infection with P. aeruginosa may advise targeted preventive (antibody-based) strategies and antibiotic therapy. To inve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas Ewout van der Schalk, Jasmine Coppens, Leen Timbermont, Agata Turlej-Rogacka, Liesbet Van Heirstraeten, Matilda Berkell, Li Yu, Christine Lammens, Basil Britto Xavier, Veerle Matheeussen, Margareta Ieven, Michael McCarthy, Philippe G. Jorens, Alexey Ruzin, Mark T. Esser, Samir Kumar-Singh, Herman Goossens, Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-07-01
Series:Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Subjects:
VAP
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00978-9
id doaj-2c041679eeed4e209132e3d63a661cb1
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thomas Ewout van der Schalk
Jasmine Coppens
Leen Timbermont
Agata Turlej-Rogacka
Liesbet Van Heirstraeten
Matilda Berkell
Li Yu
Christine Lammens
Basil Britto Xavier
Veerle Matheeussen
Margareta Ieven
Michael McCarthy
Philippe G. Jorens
Alexey Ruzin
Mark T. Esser
Samir Kumar-Singh
Herman Goossens
Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar
spellingShingle Thomas Ewout van der Schalk
Jasmine Coppens
Leen Timbermont
Agata Turlej-Rogacka
Liesbet Van Heirstraeten
Matilda Berkell
Li Yu
Christine Lammens
Basil Britto Xavier
Veerle Matheeussen
Margareta Ieven
Michael McCarthy
Philippe G. Jorens
Alexey Ruzin
Mark T. Esser
Samir Kumar-Singh
Herman Goossens
Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar
Evaluation of GeneXpert PA assay compared to genomic and (semi-)quantitative culture methods for direct detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in endotracheal aspirates
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Cepheid
GeneXpert
Real-time PCR
Rapid diagnostics
VAP
Ventilator-associated pneumonia
author_facet Thomas Ewout van der Schalk
Jasmine Coppens
Leen Timbermont
Agata Turlej-Rogacka
Liesbet Van Heirstraeten
Matilda Berkell
Li Yu
Christine Lammens
Basil Britto Xavier
Veerle Matheeussen
Margareta Ieven
Michael McCarthy
Philippe G. Jorens
Alexey Ruzin
Mark T. Esser
Samir Kumar-Singh
Herman Goossens
Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar
author_sort Thomas Ewout van der Schalk
title Evaluation of GeneXpert PA assay compared to genomic and (semi-)quantitative culture methods for direct detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in endotracheal aspirates
title_short Evaluation of GeneXpert PA assay compared to genomic and (semi-)quantitative culture methods for direct detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in endotracheal aspirates
title_full Evaluation of GeneXpert PA assay compared to genomic and (semi-)quantitative culture methods for direct detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in endotracheal aspirates
title_fullStr Evaluation of GeneXpert PA assay compared to genomic and (semi-)quantitative culture methods for direct detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in endotracheal aspirates
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of GeneXpert PA assay compared to genomic and (semi-)quantitative culture methods for direct detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in endotracheal aspirates
title_sort evaluation of genexpert pa assay compared to genomic and (semi-)quantitative culture methods for direct detection of pseudomonas aeruginosa in endotracheal aspirates
publisher BMC
series Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
issn 2047-2994
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Abstract Introduction Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a common cause of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Rapid and accurate detection of lower respiratory tract colonization and/or infection with P. aeruginosa may advise targeted preventive (antibody-based) strategies and antibiotic therapy. To investigate this, we compared semi-quantitative culture results from 80 endotracheal aspirates (ETA) collected from mechanically-ventilated patients, to two culture and two non-culture-based methods for detection of P. aeruginosa. Methods P. aeruginosa-positive (n = 40) and -negative (n = 40) ETAs from mechanically ventilated patients analyzed initally by (i) routine semi-quantitative culture, were further analyzed with (ii) quantitative culture on chromogenic ChromID P. aeruginosa and blood agar; (iii) enrichment in brain heart infusion broth followed by plating on blood agar and ChromID P. aeruginosa; (iv) O-antigen acetylase gene-based TaqMan qPCR; and (v) GeneXpert PA PCR assay. Results Of the 80 ETA samples included, one sample that was negative for P. aeruginosa by semi-quantitative culture was found to be positive by the other four methods, and was included in an “extended” gold standard panel. Based on this extended gold standard, both semi-quantitative culture and the GeneXpert PA assay showed 97.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The quantitative culture, enrichment culture and O-antigen acetylase gene-based TaqMan qPCR had a sensitivity of 97.6%, 89.5%, 92.7%, and a specificity of 97.4%, 100%, and 71.1%, respectively. Conclusion This first evaluation of the GeneXpert PA assay with ETA samples found it to be as sensitive and specific as the routine, hospital-based semi-quantitative culture method. Additionally, the GeneXpert PA assay is easy to perform (hands-on time ≈ 5 min) and rapid (≈ 55 min assay time). The combination of the high sensitivity and high specificity together with the rapid acquisition of results makes the GeneXpert PA assay a highly recommended screening technique. Where this equipment is not available, semi-quantitative culture remains the most sensitive of the culture methods evaluated here for P. aeruginosa detection in ETA samples.
topic Cepheid
GeneXpert
Real-time PCR
Rapid diagnostics
VAP
Ventilator-associated pneumonia
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00978-9
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasewoutvanderschalk evaluationofgenexpertpaassaycomparedtogenomicandsemiquantitativeculturemethodsfordirectdetectionofpseudomonasaeruginosainendotrachealaspirates
AT jasminecoppens evaluationofgenexpertpaassaycomparedtogenomicandsemiquantitativeculturemethodsfordirectdetectionofpseudomonasaeruginosainendotrachealaspirates
AT leentimbermont evaluationofgenexpertpaassaycomparedtogenomicandsemiquantitativeculturemethodsfordirectdetectionofpseudomonasaeruginosainendotrachealaspirates
AT agataturlejrogacka evaluationofgenexpertpaassaycomparedtogenomicandsemiquantitativeculturemethodsfordirectdetectionofpseudomonasaeruginosainendotrachealaspirates
AT liesbetvanheirstraeten evaluationofgenexpertpaassaycomparedtogenomicandsemiquantitativeculturemethodsfordirectdetectionofpseudomonasaeruginosainendotrachealaspirates
AT matildaberkell evaluationofgenexpertpaassaycomparedtogenomicandsemiquantitativeculturemethodsfordirectdetectionofpseudomonasaeruginosainendotrachealaspirates
AT liyu evaluationofgenexpertpaassaycomparedtogenomicandsemiquantitativeculturemethodsfordirectdetectionofpseudomonasaeruginosainendotrachealaspirates
AT christinelammens evaluationofgenexpertpaassaycomparedtogenomicandsemiquantitativeculturemethodsfordirectdetectionofpseudomonasaeruginosainendotrachealaspirates
AT basilbrittoxavier evaluationofgenexpertpaassaycomparedtogenomicandsemiquantitativeculturemethodsfordirectdetectionofpseudomonasaeruginosainendotrachealaspirates
AT veerlematheeussen evaluationofgenexpertpaassaycomparedtogenomicandsemiquantitativeculturemethodsfordirectdetectionofpseudomonasaeruginosainendotrachealaspirates
AT margaretaieven evaluationofgenexpertpaassaycomparedtogenomicandsemiquantitativeculturemethodsfordirectdetectionofpseudomonasaeruginosainendotrachealaspirates
AT michaelmccarthy evaluationofgenexpertpaassaycomparedtogenomicandsemiquantitativeculturemethodsfordirectdetectionofpseudomonasaeruginosainendotrachealaspirates
AT philippegjorens evaluationofgenexpertpaassaycomparedtogenomicandsemiquantitativeculturemethodsfordirectdetectionofpseudomonasaeruginosainendotrachealaspirates
AT alexeyruzin evaluationofgenexpertpaassaycomparedtogenomicandsemiquantitativeculturemethodsfordirectdetectionofpseudomonasaeruginosainendotrachealaspirates
AT marktesser evaluationofgenexpertpaassaycomparedtogenomicandsemiquantitativeculturemethodsfordirectdetectionofpseudomonasaeruginosainendotrachealaspirates
AT samirkumarsingh evaluationofgenexpertpaassaycomparedtogenomicandsemiquantitativeculturemethodsfordirectdetectionofpseudomonasaeruginosainendotrachealaspirates
AT hermangoossens evaluationofgenexpertpaassaycomparedtogenomicandsemiquantitativeculturemethodsfordirectdetectionofpseudomonasaeruginosainendotrachealaspirates
AT surbhimalhotrakumar evaluationofgenexpertpaassaycomparedtogenomicandsemiquantitativeculturemethodsfordirectdetectionofpseudomonasaeruginosainendotrachealaspirates
_version_ 1721282839490592768
spelling doaj-2c041679eeed4e209132e3d63a661cb12021-07-25T11:42:35ZengBMCAntimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control2047-29942021-07-0110111010.1186/s13756-021-00978-9Evaluation of GeneXpert PA assay compared to genomic and (semi-)quantitative culture methods for direct detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in endotracheal aspiratesThomas Ewout van der Schalk0Jasmine Coppens1Leen Timbermont2Agata Turlej-Rogacka3Liesbet Van Heirstraeten4Matilda Berkell5Li Yu6Christine Lammens7Basil Britto Xavier8Veerle Matheeussen9Margareta Ieven10Michael McCarthy11Philippe G. Jorens12Alexey Ruzin13Mark T. Esser14Samir Kumar-Singh15Herman Goossens16Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar17Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute , University of AntwerpLaboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute , University of AntwerpLaboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute , University of AntwerpLaboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute , University of AntwerpLaboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute , University of AntwerpLaboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute , University of AntwerpStatistical Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZenecaLaboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute , University of AntwerpLaboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute , University of AntwerpLaboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Antwerp University HospitalLaboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute , University of AntwerpEarly-Stage Development, Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolism, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZenecaDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine , Antwerp University HospitalMicrobial Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZenecaMicrobial Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZenecaLaboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute , University of AntwerpLaboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute , University of AntwerpLaboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute , University of AntwerpAbstract Introduction Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a common cause of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Rapid and accurate detection of lower respiratory tract colonization and/or infection with P. aeruginosa may advise targeted preventive (antibody-based) strategies and antibiotic therapy. To investigate this, we compared semi-quantitative culture results from 80 endotracheal aspirates (ETA) collected from mechanically-ventilated patients, to two culture and two non-culture-based methods for detection of P. aeruginosa. Methods P. aeruginosa-positive (n = 40) and -negative (n = 40) ETAs from mechanically ventilated patients analyzed initally by (i) routine semi-quantitative culture, were further analyzed with (ii) quantitative culture on chromogenic ChromID P. aeruginosa and blood agar; (iii) enrichment in brain heart infusion broth followed by plating on blood agar and ChromID P. aeruginosa; (iv) O-antigen acetylase gene-based TaqMan qPCR; and (v) GeneXpert PA PCR assay. Results Of the 80 ETA samples included, one sample that was negative for P. aeruginosa by semi-quantitative culture was found to be positive by the other four methods, and was included in an “extended” gold standard panel. Based on this extended gold standard, both semi-quantitative culture and the GeneXpert PA assay showed 97.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The quantitative culture, enrichment culture and O-antigen acetylase gene-based TaqMan qPCR had a sensitivity of 97.6%, 89.5%, 92.7%, and a specificity of 97.4%, 100%, and 71.1%, respectively. Conclusion This first evaluation of the GeneXpert PA assay with ETA samples found it to be as sensitive and specific as the routine, hospital-based semi-quantitative culture method. Additionally, the GeneXpert PA assay is easy to perform (hands-on time ≈ 5 min) and rapid (≈ 55 min assay time). The combination of the high sensitivity and high specificity together with the rapid acquisition of results makes the GeneXpert PA assay a highly recommended screening technique. Where this equipment is not available, semi-quantitative culture remains the most sensitive of the culture methods evaluated here for P. aeruginosa detection in ETA samples.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00978-9CepheidGeneXpertReal-time PCRRapid diagnosticsVAPVentilator-associated pneumonia