To know or not to know? Theta and delta reflect complementary information about an advanced cue before feedback in decision-making

To investigate brain activity during the reinforcement learning process in social contexts is a topic of increasing research interest. Previous studies have mainly focused on using electroencephalograms (EEG) for feedback evaluation in reinforcement learning tasks by measuring event related potentia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jing Wang, Zhaofeng Chen, Xiaozhe Peng, Tiantian Yang, Peng Li, Fengyu Cong, Hong Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01556/full
id doaj-2c11b794e2494845829f642de1558d1d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2c11b794e2494845829f642de1558d1d2020-11-24T23:13:42ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782016-10-01710.3389/fpsyg.2016.01556214216To know or not to know? Theta and delta reflect complementary information about an advanced cue before feedback in decision-makingJing Wang0Zhaofeng Chen1Xiaozhe Peng2Tiantian Yang3Peng Li4Fengyu Cong5Hong Li6Shenzhen UniversityDalian University of TechnologyShenzhen UniversityDalian University of TechnologyShenzhen UniversityDalian University of TechnologyShenzhen UniversityTo investigate brain activity during the reinforcement learning process in social contexts is a topic of increasing research interest. Previous studies have mainly focused on using electroencephalograms (EEG) for feedback evaluation in reinforcement learning tasks by measuring event related potentials (ERPs). Few studies have investigated the time-frequency (TF) profiles of a cue that manifested whether a following feedback is available or not after decision-making. Moreover, it remains unclear whether the TF profiles of the cue interacts with different agents to whom the feedback related. In this study we used the TF approach to test EEG oscillations of the cue stimuli in three agents (‘Self’, ‘Other’, and ‘Computer’) conditions separately. The results showed that the increased central-posterior delta power was elicited by the feedback unavailable cues more so than with the feedback available cue within 200-350 ms after the onset of the cue, but only in the self-condition. Moreover, a frontal-central theta oscillation had enhanced power when following the feedback unavailable cue as opposed to the feedback available cue across three agencies. These findings demonstrated that the cue for knowing an outcome produced reward prediction error (RPE)-like signals, which were mirrored by the delta and theta oscillations during decision-making. More importantly, the present study demonstrated that the theta and delta oscillations reflected separable components of the advanced cue processing before the feedback in decision-making.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01556/fullagencyreinforcement learningthetadeltatime-frequency.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jing Wang
Zhaofeng Chen
Xiaozhe Peng
Tiantian Yang
Peng Li
Fengyu Cong
Hong Li
spellingShingle Jing Wang
Zhaofeng Chen
Xiaozhe Peng
Tiantian Yang
Peng Li
Fengyu Cong
Hong Li
To know or not to know? Theta and delta reflect complementary information about an advanced cue before feedback in decision-making
Frontiers in Psychology
agency
reinforcement learning
theta
delta
time-frequency.
author_facet Jing Wang
Zhaofeng Chen
Xiaozhe Peng
Tiantian Yang
Peng Li
Fengyu Cong
Hong Li
author_sort Jing Wang
title To know or not to know? Theta and delta reflect complementary information about an advanced cue before feedback in decision-making
title_short To know or not to know? Theta and delta reflect complementary information about an advanced cue before feedback in decision-making
title_full To know or not to know? Theta and delta reflect complementary information about an advanced cue before feedback in decision-making
title_fullStr To know or not to know? Theta and delta reflect complementary information about an advanced cue before feedback in decision-making
title_full_unstemmed To know or not to know? Theta and delta reflect complementary information about an advanced cue before feedback in decision-making
title_sort to know or not to know? theta and delta reflect complementary information about an advanced cue before feedback in decision-making
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2016-10-01
description To investigate brain activity during the reinforcement learning process in social contexts is a topic of increasing research interest. Previous studies have mainly focused on using electroencephalograms (EEG) for feedback evaluation in reinforcement learning tasks by measuring event related potentials (ERPs). Few studies have investigated the time-frequency (TF) profiles of a cue that manifested whether a following feedback is available or not after decision-making. Moreover, it remains unclear whether the TF profiles of the cue interacts with different agents to whom the feedback related. In this study we used the TF approach to test EEG oscillations of the cue stimuli in three agents (‘Self’, ‘Other’, and ‘Computer’) conditions separately. The results showed that the increased central-posterior delta power was elicited by the feedback unavailable cues more so than with the feedback available cue within 200-350 ms after the onset of the cue, but only in the self-condition. Moreover, a frontal-central theta oscillation had enhanced power when following the feedback unavailable cue as opposed to the feedback available cue across three agencies. These findings demonstrated that the cue for knowing an outcome produced reward prediction error (RPE)-like signals, which were mirrored by the delta and theta oscillations during decision-making. More importantly, the present study demonstrated that the theta and delta oscillations reflected separable components of the advanced cue processing before the feedback in decision-making.
topic agency
reinforcement learning
theta
delta
time-frequency.
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01556/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jingwang toknowornottoknowthetaanddeltareflectcomplementaryinformationaboutanadvancedcuebeforefeedbackindecisionmaking
AT zhaofengchen toknowornottoknowthetaanddeltareflectcomplementaryinformationaboutanadvancedcuebeforefeedbackindecisionmaking
AT xiaozhepeng toknowornottoknowthetaanddeltareflectcomplementaryinformationaboutanadvancedcuebeforefeedbackindecisionmaking
AT tiantianyang toknowornottoknowthetaanddeltareflectcomplementaryinformationaboutanadvancedcuebeforefeedbackindecisionmaking
AT pengli toknowornottoknowthetaanddeltareflectcomplementaryinformationaboutanadvancedcuebeforefeedbackindecisionmaking
AT fengyucong toknowornottoknowthetaanddeltareflectcomplementaryinformationaboutanadvancedcuebeforefeedbackindecisionmaking
AT hongli toknowornottoknowthetaanddeltareflectcomplementaryinformationaboutanadvancedcuebeforefeedbackindecisionmaking
_version_ 1725597001929719808