The essential foundations of argumentation in science education: a study from the units, taxonomic elements and quality of the argument

This study aims to understand the argumentative discussions established by children during the development of Inquiry-based Activities in Science Education (IBASE). For this, we elaborated two instruments of analysis of the argumentation. The first, called Taxonomical Elements of Scientific Argument...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Geraldo Fernandes, António M. Rodrigues, Carlos A. Ferreira
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) 2018-12-01
Series:Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/56685
id doaj-2d9b1c4edb774691be0897a6be5558a6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2d9b1c4edb774691be0897a6be5558a62020-11-25T01:51:07ZspaUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física1677-23342175-79412018-12-013531020105910.5007/2175-7941.2018v35n3p102029995The essential foundations of argumentation in science education: a study from the units, taxonomic elements and quality of the argumentGeraldo Fernandes0António M. Rodrigues1Carlos A. Ferreira2Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e MucuriLaboratório de Pedagogia, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa e UIDEF, Unidade de Investigação e Desenvolvimento em Educação e Formação, Instituto de Educação, Universidade de LisboaFaculdade de Motricidade Humana, Instituto de Educação, Universidade de LisboaThis study aims to understand the argumentative discussions established by children during the development of Inquiry-based Activities in Science Education (IBASE). For this, we elaborated two instruments of analysis of the argumentation. The first, called Taxonomical Elements of Scientific Argumentation (TESA), seeks to characterize the structure and progression of the argument and the second, called Quality of the Modified Argument, aims to rank the argument at different levels. To exemplify the use of these instruments, the children's and young people's argument was analyzed in a scientific workshop on "Flight of the Airplanes". As a result, the categories evidenced by TESAs cannot be thought of as isolated and autonomous units, but rather as a continuum of evolution, characterizing in discursive movements from the simplest to the most complex.https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/56685argumentação científicaensino de ciências por investigaçãoelementos taxonômicos da argumentação científica
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Geraldo Fernandes
António M. Rodrigues
Carlos A. Ferreira
spellingShingle Geraldo Fernandes
António M. Rodrigues
Carlos A. Ferreira
The essential foundations of argumentation in science education: a study from the units, taxonomic elements and quality of the argument
Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física
argumentação científica
ensino de ciências por investigação
elementos taxonômicos da argumentação científica
author_facet Geraldo Fernandes
António M. Rodrigues
Carlos A. Ferreira
author_sort Geraldo Fernandes
title The essential foundations of argumentation in science education: a study from the units, taxonomic elements and quality of the argument
title_short The essential foundations of argumentation in science education: a study from the units, taxonomic elements and quality of the argument
title_full The essential foundations of argumentation in science education: a study from the units, taxonomic elements and quality of the argument
title_fullStr The essential foundations of argumentation in science education: a study from the units, taxonomic elements and quality of the argument
title_full_unstemmed The essential foundations of argumentation in science education: a study from the units, taxonomic elements and quality of the argument
title_sort essential foundations of argumentation in science education: a study from the units, taxonomic elements and quality of the argument
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
series Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física
issn 1677-2334
2175-7941
publishDate 2018-12-01
description This study aims to understand the argumentative discussions established by children during the development of Inquiry-based Activities in Science Education (IBASE). For this, we elaborated two instruments of analysis of the argumentation. The first, called Taxonomical Elements of Scientific Argumentation (TESA), seeks to characterize the structure and progression of the argument and the second, called Quality of the Modified Argument, aims to rank the argument at different levels. To exemplify the use of these instruments, the children's and young people's argument was analyzed in a scientific workshop on "Flight of the Airplanes". As a result, the categories evidenced by TESAs cannot be thought of as isolated and autonomous units, but rather as a continuum of evolution, characterizing in discursive movements from the simplest to the most complex.
topic argumentação científica
ensino de ciências por investigação
elementos taxonômicos da argumentação científica
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/56685
work_keys_str_mv AT geraldofernandes theessentialfoundationsofargumentationinscienceeducationastudyfromtheunitstaxonomicelementsandqualityoftheargument
AT antoniomrodrigues theessentialfoundationsofargumentationinscienceeducationastudyfromtheunitstaxonomicelementsandqualityoftheargument
AT carlosaferreira theessentialfoundationsofargumentationinscienceeducationastudyfromtheunitstaxonomicelementsandqualityoftheargument
AT geraldofernandes essentialfoundationsofargumentationinscienceeducationastudyfromtheunitstaxonomicelementsandqualityoftheargument
AT antoniomrodrigues essentialfoundationsofargumentationinscienceeducationastudyfromtheunitstaxonomicelementsandqualityoftheargument
AT carlosaferreira essentialfoundationsofargumentationinscienceeducationastudyfromtheunitstaxonomicelementsandqualityoftheargument
_version_ 1724998462990188544