Differential Effect of Viable Versus Necrotic Neutrophils on Mycobacterium tuberculosis Growth and Cytokine Induction in Whole Blood

Neutrophils exert both positive and negative influences on the host response to tuberculosis, but the mechanisms by which these differential effects are mediated are unknown. We studied the impact of live and dead neutrophils on the control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis using a whole blood biolumine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David M. Lowe, Julie Demaret, Nonzwakazi Bangani, Justine K. Nakiwala, Rene Goliath, Katalin A. Wilkinson, Robert J. Wilkinson, Adrian R. Martineau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Immunology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00903/full
id doaj-2ee14c7f09e24a688c1c18453a7496a6
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David M. Lowe
David M. Lowe
David M. Lowe
Julie Demaret
Nonzwakazi Bangani
Justine K. Nakiwala
Justine K. Nakiwala
Justine K. Nakiwala
Rene Goliath
Katalin A. Wilkinson
Katalin A. Wilkinson
Robert J. Wilkinson
Robert J. Wilkinson
Robert J. Wilkinson
Adrian R. Martineau
spellingShingle David M. Lowe
David M. Lowe
David M. Lowe
Julie Demaret
Nonzwakazi Bangani
Justine K. Nakiwala
Justine K. Nakiwala
Justine K. Nakiwala
Rene Goliath
Katalin A. Wilkinson
Katalin A. Wilkinson
Robert J. Wilkinson
Robert J. Wilkinson
Robert J. Wilkinson
Adrian R. Martineau
Differential Effect of Viable Versus Necrotic Neutrophils on Mycobacterium tuberculosis Growth and Cytokine Induction in Whole Blood
Frontiers in Immunology
neutrophil
mycobacteria
tuberculosis
necrosis
viability
author_facet David M. Lowe
David M. Lowe
David M. Lowe
Julie Demaret
Nonzwakazi Bangani
Justine K. Nakiwala
Justine K. Nakiwala
Justine K. Nakiwala
Rene Goliath
Katalin A. Wilkinson
Katalin A. Wilkinson
Robert J. Wilkinson
Robert J. Wilkinson
Robert J. Wilkinson
Adrian R. Martineau
author_sort David M. Lowe
title Differential Effect of Viable Versus Necrotic Neutrophils on Mycobacterium tuberculosis Growth and Cytokine Induction in Whole Blood
title_short Differential Effect of Viable Versus Necrotic Neutrophils on Mycobacterium tuberculosis Growth and Cytokine Induction in Whole Blood
title_full Differential Effect of Viable Versus Necrotic Neutrophils on Mycobacterium tuberculosis Growth and Cytokine Induction in Whole Blood
title_fullStr Differential Effect of Viable Versus Necrotic Neutrophils on Mycobacterium tuberculosis Growth and Cytokine Induction in Whole Blood
title_full_unstemmed Differential Effect of Viable Versus Necrotic Neutrophils on Mycobacterium tuberculosis Growth and Cytokine Induction in Whole Blood
title_sort differential effect of viable versus necrotic neutrophils on mycobacterium tuberculosis growth and cytokine induction in whole blood
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Immunology
issn 1664-3224
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Neutrophils exert both positive and negative influences on the host response to tuberculosis, but the mechanisms by which these differential effects are mediated are unknown. We studied the impact of live and dead neutrophils on the control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis using a whole blood bioluminescence-based assay, and assayed supernatant cytokine concentrations using Luminex™ technology and ELISA. CD15+ granulocyte depletion from blood prior to infection with M. tuberculosis-lux impaired control of mycobacteria by 96 h, with a greater effect than depletion of CD4+, CD8+, or CD14+ cells (p < 0.001). Augmentation of blood with viable granulocytes significantly improved control of mycobacteria by 96 h (p = 0.001), but augmentation with necrotic granulocytes had the opposite effect (p = 0.01). Both augmentations decreased supernatant concentrations of tumor necrosis factor and interleukin (IL)-12 p40/p70, but necrotic granulocyte augmentation also increased concentrations of IL-10, G-CSF, GM-CSF, and CCL2. Necrotic neutrophil augmentation reduced phagocytosis of FITC-labeled M. bovis BCG by all phagocytes, whereas viable neutrophil augmentation specifically reduced early uptake by CD14+ cells. The immunosuppressive effect of dead neutrophils required necrotic debris rather than supernatant. We conclude that viable neutrophils enhance control of M. tuberculosis in blood, but necrotic neutrophils have the opposite effect—the latter associated with induction of IL-10, growth factors, and chemoattractants. Our findings suggest a mechanism by which necrotic neutrophils may exert detrimental effects on the host response in active tuberculosis.
topic neutrophil
mycobacteria
tuberculosis
necrosis
viability
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00903/full
work_keys_str_mv AT davidmlowe differentialeffectofviableversusnecroticneutrophilsonmycobacteriumtuberculosisgrowthandcytokineinductioninwholeblood
AT davidmlowe differentialeffectofviableversusnecroticneutrophilsonmycobacteriumtuberculosisgrowthandcytokineinductioninwholeblood
AT davidmlowe differentialeffectofviableversusnecroticneutrophilsonmycobacteriumtuberculosisgrowthandcytokineinductioninwholeblood
AT juliedemaret differentialeffectofviableversusnecroticneutrophilsonmycobacteriumtuberculosisgrowthandcytokineinductioninwholeblood
AT nonzwakazibangani differentialeffectofviableversusnecroticneutrophilsonmycobacteriumtuberculosisgrowthandcytokineinductioninwholeblood
AT justineknakiwala differentialeffectofviableversusnecroticneutrophilsonmycobacteriumtuberculosisgrowthandcytokineinductioninwholeblood
AT justineknakiwala differentialeffectofviableversusnecroticneutrophilsonmycobacteriumtuberculosisgrowthandcytokineinductioninwholeblood
AT justineknakiwala differentialeffectofviableversusnecroticneutrophilsonmycobacteriumtuberculosisgrowthandcytokineinductioninwholeblood
AT renegoliath differentialeffectofviableversusnecroticneutrophilsonmycobacteriumtuberculosisgrowthandcytokineinductioninwholeblood
AT katalinawilkinson differentialeffectofviableversusnecroticneutrophilsonmycobacteriumtuberculosisgrowthandcytokineinductioninwholeblood
AT katalinawilkinson differentialeffectofviableversusnecroticneutrophilsonmycobacteriumtuberculosisgrowthandcytokineinductioninwholeblood
AT robertjwilkinson differentialeffectofviableversusnecroticneutrophilsonmycobacteriumtuberculosisgrowthandcytokineinductioninwholeblood
AT robertjwilkinson differentialeffectofviableversusnecroticneutrophilsonmycobacteriumtuberculosisgrowthandcytokineinductioninwholeblood
AT robertjwilkinson differentialeffectofviableversusnecroticneutrophilsonmycobacteriumtuberculosisgrowthandcytokineinductioninwholeblood
AT adrianrmartineau differentialeffectofviableversusnecroticneutrophilsonmycobacteriumtuberculosisgrowthandcytokineinductioninwholeblood
_version_ 1725586813716791296
spelling doaj-2ee14c7f09e24a688c1c18453a7496a62020-11-24T23:16:32ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Immunology1664-32242018-04-01910.3389/fimmu.2018.00903339956Differential Effect of Viable Versus Necrotic Neutrophils on Mycobacterium tuberculosis Growth and Cytokine Induction in Whole BloodDavid M. Lowe0David M. Lowe1David M. Lowe2Julie Demaret3Nonzwakazi Bangani4Justine K. Nakiwala5Justine K. Nakiwala6Justine K. Nakiwala7Rene Goliath8Katalin A. Wilkinson9Katalin A. Wilkinson10Robert J. Wilkinson11Robert J. Wilkinson12Robert J. Wilkinson13Adrian R. Martineau14Wellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, Department of Medicine, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South AfricaDepartment of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United KingdomInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United KingdomBarts and The London School of Medicine, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United KingdomWellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, Department of Medicine, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South AfricaWellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, Department of Medicine, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South AfricaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, BelgiumDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumWellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, Department of Medicine, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South AfricaWellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, Department of Medicine, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South AfricaThe Francis Crick Institute, London, United KingdomWellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, Department of Medicine, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South AfricaDepartment of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United KingdomThe Francis Crick Institute, London, United KingdomBarts and The London School of Medicine, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United KingdomNeutrophils exert both positive and negative influences on the host response to tuberculosis, but the mechanisms by which these differential effects are mediated are unknown. We studied the impact of live and dead neutrophils on the control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis using a whole blood bioluminescence-based assay, and assayed supernatant cytokine concentrations using Luminex™ technology and ELISA. CD15+ granulocyte depletion from blood prior to infection with M. tuberculosis-lux impaired control of mycobacteria by 96 h, with a greater effect than depletion of CD4+, CD8+, or CD14+ cells (p < 0.001). Augmentation of blood with viable granulocytes significantly improved control of mycobacteria by 96 h (p = 0.001), but augmentation with necrotic granulocytes had the opposite effect (p = 0.01). Both augmentations decreased supernatant concentrations of tumor necrosis factor and interleukin (IL)-12 p40/p70, but necrotic granulocyte augmentation also increased concentrations of IL-10, G-CSF, GM-CSF, and CCL2. Necrotic neutrophil augmentation reduced phagocytosis of FITC-labeled M. bovis BCG by all phagocytes, whereas viable neutrophil augmentation specifically reduced early uptake by CD14+ cells. The immunosuppressive effect of dead neutrophils required necrotic debris rather than supernatant. We conclude that viable neutrophils enhance control of M. tuberculosis in blood, but necrotic neutrophils have the opposite effect—the latter associated with induction of IL-10, growth factors, and chemoattractants. Our findings suggest a mechanism by which necrotic neutrophils may exert detrimental effects on the host response in active tuberculosis.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00903/fullneutrophilmycobacteriatuberculosisnecrosisviability