Bridging the gap between cell culture and live tissue

Traditional in vitro two-dimensional (2-D) culture systems only partly imitate the physiological and biochemical features of cells in their original tissue. In vivo, in organs and tissues, cells are surrounded by a three-dimensional (3-D) organization of supporting matrix and neighbouring cells, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stefan Przyborski, Fulvio Gandolfi, Tiziana A.L. Brevini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Università degli Studi di Milano 2017-11-01
Series:International Journal of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety
Online Access:https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/haf/article/view/8518
id doaj-3980346d6d8148c5ac3d95aa2a58914e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3980346d6d8148c5ac3d95aa2a58914e2020-11-25T01:57:38ZengUniversità degli Studi di MilanoInternational Journal of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety2283-39272017-11-014110.13130/2283-3927/85187949Bridging the gap between cell culture and live tissueStefan Przyborski0Fulvio Gandolfi1Tiziana A.L. Brevini2Department of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, United KingdomDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences-Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano; Milan, 20133, ItalyUnistem, Centre for Stem Cell Research and 3Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, Università degli Studi di Milano; Milan, 20133, ItalyTraditional in vitro two-dimensional (2-D) culture systems only partly imitate the physiological and biochemical features of cells in their original tissue. In vivo, in organs and tissues, cells are surrounded by a three-dimensional (3-D) organization of supporting matrix and neighbouring cells, and a gradient of chemical and mechanical signals. Furthermore, the presence of blood flow and mechanical movement provides a dynamic environment (Jong et al., 2011). In contrast, traditional in vitro culture, carried out on 2-D plastic or glass substrates, typically provides a static environment, which, however is the base of the present understanding of many biological processes, tissue homeostasis as well as disease. It is clear that this is not an exact representation of what is happening in vivo and the microenvironment provided by in vitro cell culture models are significantly different and can cause deviations in cell response and behaviour from those distinctive of in vivo tissues. In order to translate the present basic knowledge in cell control, cell repair and regeneration from the laboratory bench to the clinical application, we need a better understanding of the cell and tissue interactions. This implies a detailed comprehension of the natural tissue environment, with its organization and local signals, in order to more closely mimic what happens in vivo, developing more physiological models for efficient in vitro systems. In particular, it is imperative to understand the role of the environmental cues which can be mainly divided into those of a chemical and mechanical nature.https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/haf/article/view/8518
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stefan Przyborski
Fulvio Gandolfi
Tiziana A.L. Brevini
spellingShingle Stefan Przyborski
Fulvio Gandolfi
Tiziana A.L. Brevini
Bridging the gap between cell culture and live tissue
International Journal of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety
author_facet Stefan Przyborski
Fulvio Gandolfi
Tiziana A.L. Brevini
author_sort Stefan Przyborski
title Bridging the gap between cell culture and live tissue
title_short Bridging the gap between cell culture and live tissue
title_full Bridging the gap between cell culture and live tissue
title_fullStr Bridging the gap between cell culture and live tissue
title_full_unstemmed Bridging the gap between cell culture and live tissue
title_sort bridging the gap between cell culture and live tissue
publisher Università degli Studi di Milano
series International Journal of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety
issn 2283-3927
publishDate 2017-11-01
description Traditional in vitro two-dimensional (2-D) culture systems only partly imitate the physiological and biochemical features of cells in their original tissue. In vivo, in organs and tissues, cells are surrounded by a three-dimensional (3-D) organization of supporting matrix and neighbouring cells, and a gradient of chemical and mechanical signals. Furthermore, the presence of blood flow and mechanical movement provides a dynamic environment (Jong et al., 2011). In contrast, traditional in vitro culture, carried out on 2-D plastic or glass substrates, typically provides a static environment, which, however is the base of the present understanding of many biological processes, tissue homeostasis as well as disease. It is clear that this is not an exact representation of what is happening in vivo and the microenvironment provided by in vitro cell culture models are significantly different and can cause deviations in cell response and behaviour from those distinctive of in vivo tissues. In order to translate the present basic knowledge in cell control, cell repair and regeneration from the laboratory bench to the clinical application, we need a better understanding of the cell and tissue interactions. This implies a detailed comprehension of the natural tissue environment, with its organization and local signals, in order to more closely mimic what happens in vivo, developing more physiological models for efficient in vitro systems. In particular, it is imperative to understand the role of the environmental cues which can be mainly divided into those of a chemical and mechanical nature.
url https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/haf/article/view/8518
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanprzyborski bridgingthegapbetweencellcultureandlivetissue
AT fulviogandolfi bridgingthegapbetweencellcultureandlivetissue
AT tizianaalbrevini bridgingthegapbetweencellcultureandlivetissue
_version_ 1724973618176196608