“Pedagogical tweeting” in higher education: boon or bane?

Abstract Social media have become widely adopted by the current generation of students. Yet, not every social media tool is as popular as others; for instance in 2016, 74.4% of Flemings ever had an account on Facebook, only 34.1% were once active on the microblogging platform Twitter. However, Twitt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Britt Adams, Annelies Raes, Hannelore Montrieux, Tammy Schellens
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2018-05-01
Series:International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41239-018-0102-5
id doaj-3a0ce83795f4471d81bb595fdfe9dcd0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3a0ce83795f4471d81bb595fdfe9dcd02020-11-25T00:37:36ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education2365-94402018-05-0115111610.1186/s41239-018-0102-5“Pedagogical tweeting” in higher education: boon or bane?Britt Adams0Annelies Raes1Hannelore Montrieux2Tammy Schellens3Department of Educational Studies, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent UniversityDepartment of Educational Studies, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent UniversityDepartment of Educational Studies, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent UniversityDepartment of Educational Studies, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent UniversityAbstract Social media have become widely adopted by the current generation of students. Yet, not every social media tool is as popular as others; for instance in 2016, 74.4% of Flemings ever had an account on Facebook, only 34.1% were once active on the microblogging platform Twitter. However, Twitter might have advantages over Facebook as a didactic agent in higher education. To date, research results on the added value of Twitter as a learning and teaching tool are still ambiguous. Therefore, this paper describes two interventions, which are evaluated using a mixed methods approach, to determine higher education students’ expectations and experiences about using Twitter for educational purposes. Results indicate that although students had moderate to high initial expectations about using Twitter in higher education, they were rather skeptical about this tool after using it. The most critical obstacles formulated by students were competence frustration, (information) overload, and extrinsic motivation; that were taken into account by designing the second, follow-up intervention. The results of both interventions are presented and discussed. This study also highlights practical implications regarding the educational use of Twitter as well as suggestions for further research.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41239-018-0102-5Higher educationSocial mediaTwitterMixed methodsExpectations and experiences
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Britt Adams
Annelies Raes
Hannelore Montrieux
Tammy Schellens
spellingShingle Britt Adams
Annelies Raes
Hannelore Montrieux
Tammy Schellens
“Pedagogical tweeting” in higher education: boon or bane?
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
Higher education
Social media
Twitter
Mixed methods
Expectations and experiences
author_facet Britt Adams
Annelies Raes
Hannelore Montrieux
Tammy Schellens
author_sort Britt Adams
title “Pedagogical tweeting” in higher education: boon or bane?
title_short “Pedagogical tweeting” in higher education: boon or bane?
title_full “Pedagogical tweeting” in higher education: boon or bane?
title_fullStr “Pedagogical tweeting” in higher education: boon or bane?
title_full_unstemmed “Pedagogical tweeting” in higher education: boon or bane?
title_sort “pedagogical tweeting” in higher education: boon or bane?
publisher SpringerOpen
series International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
issn 2365-9440
publishDate 2018-05-01
description Abstract Social media have become widely adopted by the current generation of students. Yet, not every social media tool is as popular as others; for instance in 2016, 74.4% of Flemings ever had an account on Facebook, only 34.1% were once active on the microblogging platform Twitter. However, Twitter might have advantages over Facebook as a didactic agent in higher education. To date, research results on the added value of Twitter as a learning and teaching tool are still ambiguous. Therefore, this paper describes two interventions, which are evaluated using a mixed methods approach, to determine higher education students’ expectations and experiences about using Twitter for educational purposes. Results indicate that although students had moderate to high initial expectations about using Twitter in higher education, they were rather skeptical about this tool after using it. The most critical obstacles formulated by students were competence frustration, (information) overload, and extrinsic motivation; that were taken into account by designing the second, follow-up intervention. The results of both interventions are presented and discussed. This study also highlights practical implications regarding the educational use of Twitter as well as suggestions for further research.
topic Higher education
Social media
Twitter
Mixed methods
Expectations and experiences
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41239-018-0102-5
work_keys_str_mv AT brittadams pedagogicaltweetinginhighereducationboonorbane
AT anneliesraes pedagogicaltweetinginhighereducationboonorbane
AT hanneloremontrieux pedagogicaltweetinginhighereducationboonorbane
AT tammyschellens pedagogicaltweetinginhighereducationboonorbane
_version_ 1725300436175421440