Distinct vascular genomic response of proton and gamma radiation-A pilot investigation.

The cardiovascular biology of proton radiotherapy is not well understood. We aimed to compare the genomic dose-response to proton and gamma radiation of the mouse aorta to assess whether their vascular effects may diverge. We performed comparative RNA sequencing of the aorta following (4 hrs) total-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emanuela Ricciotti, Dimitra Sarantopoulou, Gregory R Grant, Jenine K Sanzari, Gabriel S Krigsfeld, Amber J Kiliti, Ann R Kennedy, Tilo Grosser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207503
id doaj-3bfcfb91a0e24395a75dc26b10f56408
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3bfcfb91a0e24395a75dc26b10f564082021-03-03T20:53:42ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01142e020750310.1371/journal.pone.0207503Distinct vascular genomic response of proton and gamma radiation-A pilot investigation.Emanuela RicciottiDimitra SarantopoulouGregory R GrantJenine K SanzariGabriel S KrigsfeldAmber J KilitiAnn R KennedyTilo GrosserThe cardiovascular biology of proton radiotherapy is not well understood. We aimed to compare the genomic dose-response to proton and gamma radiation of the mouse aorta to assess whether their vascular effects may diverge. We performed comparative RNA sequencing of the aorta following (4 hrs) total-body proton and gamma irradiation (0.5-200 cGy whole body dose, 10 dose levels) of conscious mice. A trend analysis identified genes that showed a dose response. While fewer genes were dose-responsive to proton than gamma radiation (29 vs. 194 genes; q-value ≤ 0.1), the magnitude of the effect was greater. Highly responsive genes were enriched for radiation response pathways (DNA damage, apoptosis, cellular stress and inflammation; p-value ≤ 0.01). Gamma, but not proton radiation induced additionally genes in vasculature specific pathways. Genes responsive to both radiation types showed almost perfectly superimposable dose-response relationships. Despite the activation of canonical radiation response pathways by both radiation types, we detected marked differences in the genomic response of the murine aorta. Models of cardiovascular risk based on photon radiation may not accurately predict the risk associated with proton radiation.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207503
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emanuela Ricciotti
Dimitra Sarantopoulou
Gregory R Grant
Jenine K Sanzari
Gabriel S Krigsfeld
Amber J Kiliti
Ann R Kennedy
Tilo Grosser
spellingShingle Emanuela Ricciotti
Dimitra Sarantopoulou
Gregory R Grant
Jenine K Sanzari
Gabriel S Krigsfeld
Amber J Kiliti
Ann R Kennedy
Tilo Grosser
Distinct vascular genomic response of proton and gamma radiation-A pilot investigation.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Emanuela Ricciotti
Dimitra Sarantopoulou
Gregory R Grant
Jenine K Sanzari
Gabriel S Krigsfeld
Amber J Kiliti
Ann R Kennedy
Tilo Grosser
author_sort Emanuela Ricciotti
title Distinct vascular genomic response of proton and gamma radiation-A pilot investigation.
title_short Distinct vascular genomic response of proton and gamma radiation-A pilot investigation.
title_full Distinct vascular genomic response of proton and gamma radiation-A pilot investigation.
title_fullStr Distinct vascular genomic response of proton and gamma radiation-A pilot investigation.
title_full_unstemmed Distinct vascular genomic response of proton and gamma radiation-A pilot investigation.
title_sort distinct vascular genomic response of proton and gamma radiation-a pilot investigation.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description The cardiovascular biology of proton radiotherapy is not well understood. We aimed to compare the genomic dose-response to proton and gamma radiation of the mouse aorta to assess whether their vascular effects may diverge. We performed comparative RNA sequencing of the aorta following (4 hrs) total-body proton and gamma irradiation (0.5-200 cGy whole body dose, 10 dose levels) of conscious mice. A trend analysis identified genes that showed a dose response. While fewer genes were dose-responsive to proton than gamma radiation (29 vs. 194 genes; q-value ≤ 0.1), the magnitude of the effect was greater. Highly responsive genes were enriched for radiation response pathways (DNA damage, apoptosis, cellular stress and inflammation; p-value ≤ 0.01). Gamma, but not proton radiation induced additionally genes in vasculature specific pathways. Genes responsive to both radiation types showed almost perfectly superimposable dose-response relationships. Despite the activation of canonical radiation response pathways by both radiation types, we detected marked differences in the genomic response of the murine aorta. Models of cardiovascular risk based on photon radiation may not accurately predict the risk associated with proton radiation.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207503
work_keys_str_mv AT emanuelaricciotti distinctvasculargenomicresponseofprotonandgammaradiationapilotinvestigation
AT dimitrasarantopoulou distinctvasculargenomicresponseofprotonandgammaradiationapilotinvestigation
AT gregoryrgrant distinctvasculargenomicresponseofprotonandgammaradiationapilotinvestigation
AT jenineksanzari distinctvasculargenomicresponseofprotonandgammaradiationapilotinvestigation
AT gabrielskrigsfeld distinctvasculargenomicresponseofprotonandgammaradiationapilotinvestigation
AT amberjkiliti distinctvasculargenomicresponseofprotonandgammaradiationapilotinvestigation
AT annrkennedy distinctvasculargenomicresponseofprotonandgammaradiationapilotinvestigation
AT tilogrosser distinctvasculargenomicresponseofprotonandgammaradiationapilotinvestigation
_version_ 1714819861071265792