The Japanese version of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE): psychometric validation and discordance between clinician and patient assessments of adverse events

The Japanese version of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE): psychometric validation and discordance between clinician and patient assessments of adverse events

Abstract Background The Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) was developed by the National Cancer Institute as an adverse event assessment system to evaluate patients’ symptoms, which tend to be underestimated in cancer clinical trials....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takashi Kawaguchi, Kanako Azuma, Motohiko Sano, Soan Kim, Yosuke Kawahara, Yoko Sano, Tomohide Shimodaira, Keiichiro Ishibashi, Tempei Miyaji, Ethan Basch, Takuhiro Yamaguchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2018-01-01
Series:Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41687-017-0022-5

Internet

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41687-017-0022-5

Similar Items