Evaluating the relationship between citation set size, team size and screening methods used in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study

Evaluating the relationship between citation set size, team size and screening methods used in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study

Abstract Background Standard practice for conducting systematic reviews (SRs) is time consuming and involves the study team screening hundreds or thousands of citations. As the volume of medical literature grows, the citation set sizes and corresponding screening efforts increase. While larger team...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katie O’Hearn, Cameron MacDonald, Anne Tsampalieros, Leo Kadota, Ryan Sandarage, Supun Kotteduwa Jayawarden, Michele Datko, John M. Reynolds, Thanh Bui, Shagufta Sultan, Margaret Sampson, Misty Pratt, Nick Barrowman, Nassr Nama, Matthew Page, James Dayre McNally
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-07-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Subjects:
Systematic reviews
Scoping reviews
Crowdsourcing
Machine learning
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01335-5

Internet

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01335-5

Similar Items