Sociolinguistic factors affecting performance in the Clinical Skills Assessment of the MRCGP: a mixed-methods approach

Background: Differential performance in clinical skills assessments is a widespread phenomenon, for which there remain few explanations. Aim: To better understand the conversational contexts of simulated consultations and how candidates actually behave in these consultations and to determine socioli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kamila Hawthorne, Celia Roberts, Sarah Atkins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Royal College of General Practitioners 2017-02-01
Series:BJGP Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bjgpopen.org/content/1/1/bjgpopen17X100713/
id doaj-4128bfe73cd9452fb3690d544a440bae
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4128bfe73cd9452fb3690d544a440bae2020-11-24T23:49:11ZengRoyal College of General PractitionersBJGP Open2398-37952017-02-011110.3399/bjgpopen17X100713Sociolinguistic factors affecting performance in the Clinical Skills Assessment of the MRCGP: a mixed-methods approachKamila Hawthorne0Celia Roberts1Sarah Atkins2Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UKDiscourse and Communication, King's College, London, UKCentre for Research in Applied Linguistics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UKBackground: Differential performance in clinical skills assessments is a widespread phenomenon, for which there remain few explanations. Aim: To better understand the conversational contexts of simulated consultations and how candidates actually behave in these consultations and to determine sociolinguistic factors for high- and low-performing candidates. Design & setting: Taking the Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners' (MRCGP) clinical skills assessment (CSA) examination as a model, this research applied sociolinguistic analyses to case videos of 198 consecutive candidates presenting for the CSA examination. Method: Using a mixed-methods approach, both quantitative and qualitative sociolinguistics methodologies were combined to analyse video consultations, and findings were compared with those from group discussions with MRCGP examiners. Results: There is more ‘talk’ in simulated consultations than in real life. On macroanalysis, there was little difference between poor- and well-performing candidates. However, microanalysis found subtle differences in structuring consultations, metacommunication, picking up cues, and misunderstandings with and giving explanations to patients. Formulaic talk, contrary to examiners’ perceptions was more common in successful candidates, but it was personalised and sited appropriately in the consultation. Conclusion: This is an interactionally demanding form of clinical assessment, that requires giving support to candidates and a more analytic approach to the development of interpersonal skills. Sociolinguistic features of consulting to help trainers and candidates prepare for the CSA are identified.https://bjgpopen.org/content/1/1/bjgpopen17X100713/simulated consultationscommunication skillsassessmentsociolinguisticsgeneral practice
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kamila Hawthorne
Celia Roberts
Sarah Atkins
spellingShingle Kamila Hawthorne
Celia Roberts
Sarah Atkins
Sociolinguistic factors affecting performance in the Clinical Skills Assessment of the MRCGP: a mixed-methods approach
BJGP Open
simulated consultations
communication skills
assessment
sociolinguistics
general practice
author_facet Kamila Hawthorne
Celia Roberts
Sarah Atkins
author_sort Kamila Hawthorne
title Sociolinguistic factors affecting performance in the Clinical Skills Assessment of the MRCGP: a mixed-methods approach
title_short Sociolinguistic factors affecting performance in the Clinical Skills Assessment of the MRCGP: a mixed-methods approach
title_full Sociolinguistic factors affecting performance in the Clinical Skills Assessment of the MRCGP: a mixed-methods approach
title_fullStr Sociolinguistic factors affecting performance in the Clinical Skills Assessment of the MRCGP: a mixed-methods approach
title_full_unstemmed Sociolinguistic factors affecting performance in the Clinical Skills Assessment of the MRCGP: a mixed-methods approach
title_sort sociolinguistic factors affecting performance in the clinical skills assessment of the mrcgp: a mixed-methods approach
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
series BJGP Open
issn 2398-3795
publishDate 2017-02-01
description Background: Differential performance in clinical skills assessments is a widespread phenomenon, for which there remain few explanations. Aim: To better understand the conversational contexts of simulated consultations and how candidates actually behave in these consultations and to determine sociolinguistic factors for high- and low-performing candidates. Design & setting: Taking the Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners' (MRCGP) clinical skills assessment (CSA) examination as a model, this research applied sociolinguistic analyses to case videos of 198 consecutive candidates presenting for the CSA examination. Method: Using a mixed-methods approach, both quantitative and qualitative sociolinguistics methodologies were combined to analyse video consultations, and findings were compared with those from group discussions with MRCGP examiners. Results: There is more ‘talk’ in simulated consultations than in real life. On macroanalysis, there was little difference between poor- and well-performing candidates. However, microanalysis found subtle differences in structuring consultations, metacommunication, picking up cues, and misunderstandings with and giving explanations to patients. Formulaic talk, contrary to examiners’ perceptions was more common in successful candidates, but it was personalised and sited appropriately in the consultation. Conclusion: This is an interactionally demanding form of clinical assessment, that requires giving support to candidates and a more analytic approach to the development of interpersonal skills. Sociolinguistic features of consulting to help trainers and candidates prepare for the CSA are identified.
topic simulated consultations
communication skills
assessment
sociolinguistics
general practice
url https://bjgpopen.org/content/1/1/bjgpopen17X100713/
work_keys_str_mv AT kamilahawthorne sociolinguisticfactorsaffectingperformanceintheclinicalskillsassessmentofthemrcgpamixedmethodsapproach
AT celiaroberts sociolinguisticfactorsaffectingperformanceintheclinicalskillsassessmentofthemrcgpamixedmethodsapproach
AT sarahatkins sociolinguisticfactorsaffectingperformanceintheclinicalskillsassessmentofthemrcgpamixedmethodsapproach
_version_ 1725483632058957824