Appréhender l’innovation par l’usage des TIC dans l’enseignement supérieur : questions conceptuelles et méthodologiques

Many researches deal with innovation in higher education. Except those endorsing more or less commonplace discourse, a number of these are empirical studies. The purpose of this article is not to establish a classification of those researches but to question conceptual and methodological frameworks...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brigitte Simonnot
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Centre National d'Enseignement à Distance 2013-10-01
Series:Distances et Médiations des Savoirs
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/dms/430
id doaj-41a6c7d8c1d44982aaaa2c9aa8191bf9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-41a6c7d8c1d44982aaaa2c9aa8191bf92020-11-25T00:41:12ZfraCentre National d'Enseignement à DistanceDistances et Médiations des Savoirs2264-72282013-10-01410.4000/dms.430Appréhender l’innovation par l’usage des TIC dans l’enseignement supérieur : questions conceptuelles et méthodologiquesBrigitte SimonnotMany researches deal with innovation in higher education. Except those endorsing more or less commonplace discourse, a number of these are empirical studies. The purpose of this article is not to establish a classification of those researches but to question conceptual and methodological frameworks in scientific studies related to information and communication technologies (ICT) use. Information and communication scientists tend to prefer the notion of practices to that of use(s). We start with the four approaches which marked the “practice turn” and gathered by Christian Licoppe (2008) in his “square of activity”, ie distributed cognition, the psychological theory of activity developed by Engeström, ethnographic approaches / situated action and the actor-network theory. These four approaches originate from distinct disciplines and have in common the use of ethnographic methods, but with different positioning for the researcher. They also give a different place and role to objects or artifacts mobilized in activities. Digital technologies lead to further mediatisation of both content and exchanges in training and they are fully engaged in mediations. However, we question the relevance of putting technologies at the heart of issues without further developing the way actors conceive the very concepts of information and communication.http://journals.openedition.org/dms/430higher educationpracticesactivityinnovationconceptual approachesmethodological positioning
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brigitte Simonnot
spellingShingle Brigitte Simonnot
Appréhender l’innovation par l’usage des TIC dans l’enseignement supérieur : questions conceptuelles et méthodologiques
Distances et Médiations des Savoirs
higher education
practices
activity
innovation
conceptual approaches
methodological positioning
author_facet Brigitte Simonnot
author_sort Brigitte Simonnot
title Appréhender l’innovation par l’usage des TIC dans l’enseignement supérieur : questions conceptuelles et méthodologiques
title_short Appréhender l’innovation par l’usage des TIC dans l’enseignement supérieur : questions conceptuelles et méthodologiques
title_full Appréhender l’innovation par l’usage des TIC dans l’enseignement supérieur : questions conceptuelles et méthodologiques
title_fullStr Appréhender l’innovation par l’usage des TIC dans l’enseignement supérieur : questions conceptuelles et méthodologiques
title_full_unstemmed Appréhender l’innovation par l’usage des TIC dans l’enseignement supérieur : questions conceptuelles et méthodologiques
title_sort appréhender l’innovation par l’usage des tic dans l’enseignement supérieur : questions conceptuelles et méthodologiques
publisher Centre National d'Enseignement à Distance
series Distances et Médiations des Savoirs
issn 2264-7228
publishDate 2013-10-01
description Many researches deal with innovation in higher education. Except those endorsing more or less commonplace discourse, a number of these are empirical studies. The purpose of this article is not to establish a classification of those researches but to question conceptual and methodological frameworks in scientific studies related to information and communication technologies (ICT) use. Information and communication scientists tend to prefer the notion of practices to that of use(s). We start with the four approaches which marked the “practice turn” and gathered by Christian Licoppe (2008) in his “square of activity”, ie distributed cognition, the psychological theory of activity developed by Engeström, ethnographic approaches / situated action and the actor-network theory. These four approaches originate from distinct disciplines and have in common the use of ethnographic methods, but with different positioning for the researcher. They also give a different place and role to objects or artifacts mobilized in activities. Digital technologies lead to further mediatisation of both content and exchanges in training and they are fully engaged in mediations. However, we question the relevance of putting technologies at the heart of issues without further developing the way actors conceive the very concepts of information and communication.
topic higher education
practices
activity
innovation
conceptual approaches
methodological positioning
url http://journals.openedition.org/dms/430
work_keys_str_mv AT brigittesimonnot apprehenderlinnovationparlusagedesticdanslenseignementsuperieurquestionsconceptuellesetmethodologiques
_version_ 1725286757230968832