On the geoid and orthometric height vs. quasigeoid and normal height

The geoid, but not the quasigeoid, is an equipotential surface in the Earth’s gravity field that can serve both as a geodetic datum and a reference surface in geophysics. It is also a natural zero-level surface, as it agrees with the undisturbed mean sea level. Orthometric heights are physical heigh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sjöberg Lars E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2018-12-01
Series:Journal of Geodetic Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/jogs-2018-0011
id doaj-44333ff2d2774d71ba2ead16a9b78982
record_format Article
spelling doaj-44333ff2d2774d71ba2ead16a9b789822021-09-06T19:40:46ZengSciendoJournal of Geodetic Science2081-99432018-12-018111512010.1515/jogs-2018-0011jogs-2018-0011On the geoid and orthometric height vs. quasigeoid and normal heightSjöberg Lars E.0Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)Stockholm, SwedenThe geoid, but not the quasigeoid, is an equipotential surface in the Earth’s gravity field that can serve both as a geodetic datum and a reference surface in geophysics. It is also a natural zero-level surface, as it agrees with the undisturbed mean sea level. Orthometric heights are physical heights above the geoid,while normal heights are geometric heights (of the telluroid) above the reference ellipsoid. Normal heights and the quasigeoid can be determined without any information on the Earth’s topographic density distribution, which is not the case for orthometric heights and geoid. We show from various derivations that the difference between the geoid and the quasigeoid heights, being of the order of 5 m, can be expressed by the simple Bouguer gravity anomaly as the only term that includes the topographic density distribution. This implies that recent formulas, including the refined Bouguer anomaly and a difference between topographic gravity potentials, do not necessarily improve the result. Intuitively one may assume that the quasigeoid, closely related with the Earth’s surface, is rougher than the geoid. For numerical studies the topography is usually divided into blocks of mean elevations, excluding the problem with a non-star shaped Earth. In this case the smoothness of both types of geoid models are affected by the slope of the terrain,which shows that even at high resolutions with ultra-small blocks the geoid model is likely as rough as the quasigeoid model. In case of the real Earth there are areas where the quasigeoid, but not the geoid, is ambiguous, and this problem increases with the numerical resolution of the requested solution. These ambiguities affect also normal and orthometric heights. However, this problem can be solved by using the mean quasigeoid model defined by using average topographic heights at any requested resolution. An exact solution of the ambiguity for the normal height/quasigeoid can be provided by GNSS-levelling.https://doi.org/10.1515/jogs-2018-0011ambiguous quasigeoidgeoidgeoidquasigeoid differenceresolutionvertical datumquasigeoid
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sjöberg Lars E.
spellingShingle Sjöberg Lars E.
On the geoid and orthometric height vs. quasigeoid and normal height
Journal of Geodetic Science
ambiguous quasigeoid
geoid
geoidquasigeoid difference
resolution
vertical datum
quasigeoid
author_facet Sjöberg Lars E.
author_sort Sjöberg Lars E.
title On the geoid and orthometric height vs. quasigeoid and normal height
title_short On the geoid and orthometric height vs. quasigeoid and normal height
title_full On the geoid and orthometric height vs. quasigeoid and normal height
title_fullStr On the geoid and orthometric height vs. quasigeoid and normal height
title_full_unstemmed On the geoid and orthometric height vs. quasigeoid and normal height
title_sort on the geoid and orthometric height vs. quasigeoid and normal height
publisher Sciendo
series Journal of Geodetic Science
issn 2081-9943
publishDate 2018-12-01
description The geoid, but not the quasigeoid, is an equipotential surface in the Earth’s gravity field that can serve both as a geodetic datum and a reference surface in geophysics. It is also a natural zero-level surface, as it agrees with the undisturbed mean sea level. Orthometric heights are physical heights above the geoid,while normal heights are geometric heights (of the telluroid) above the reference ellipsoid. Normal heights and the quasigeoid can be determined without any information on the Earth’s topographic density distribution, which is not the case for orthometric heights and geoid. We show from various derivations that the difference between the geoid and the quasigeoid heights, being of the order of 5 m, can be expressed by the simple Bouguer gravity anomaly as the only term that includes the topographic density distribution. This implies that recent formulas, including the refined Bouguer anomaly and a difference between topographic gravity potentials, do not necessarily improve the result. Intuitively one may assume that the quasigeoid, closely related with the Earth’s surface, is rougher than the geoid. For numerical studies the topography is usually divided into blocks of mean elevations, excluding the problem with a non-star shaped Earth. In this case the smoothness of both types of geoid models are affected by the slope of the terrain,which shows that even at high resolutions with ultra-small blocks the geoid model is likely as rough as the quasigeoid model. In case of the real Earth there are areas where the quasigeoid, but not the geoid, is ambiguous, and this problem increases with the numerical resolution of the requested solution. These ambiguities affect also normal and orthometric heights. However, this problem can be solved by using the mean quasigeoid model defined by using average topographic heights at any requested resolution. An exact solution of the ambiguity for the normal height/quasigeoid can be provided by GNSS-levelling.
topic ambiguous quasigeoid
geoid
geoidquasigeoid difference
resolution
vertical datum
quasigeoid
url https://doi.org/10.1515/jogs-2018-0011
work_keys_str_mv AT sjoberglarse onthegeoidandorthometricheightvsquasigeoidandnormalheight
_version_ 1717767782010978304