Talking about Climate Change Mitigation: People’s Views on Different Levels of Action

Previous research has examined public views on climate change and pro-environmental behavior; however, there has been little focus on in-depth qualitative examination of views on mitigation strategies carried out by different social actors. This paper examines how people discuss strategies to mitiga...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah Becker, Paul Sparks
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-04-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1357
id doaj-4b6b8d04d7e64cf9bcd40650bee79595
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4b6b8d04d7e64cf9bcd40650bee795952020-11-24T22:28:06ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502018-04-01105135710.3390/su10051357su10051357Talking about Climate Change Mitigation: People’s Views on Different Levels of ActionSarah Becker0Paul Sparks1School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QH, UKSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QH, UKPrevious research has examined public views on climate change and pro-environmental behavior; however, there has been little focus on in-depth qualitative examination of views on mitigation strategies carried out by different social actors. This paper examines how people discuss strategies to mitigate climate change and the relative responsibilities of individuals, the UK government, and corporations. Twenty people were interviewed about what they thought should be done to reduce the degree of climate change. Three main themes in their responses are identified: (1) representations of climate change; (2) responsibility for action; and (3) opposing environmental and economic interests. Overall, there was support for a variety of climate change mitigation strategies. There was some emphasis on individual behavior change combined with suggestions about greater information provision and the importance of personal choice. Although some participants criticized economic and profit-oriented structures, there was a strong sense among participants that change in this regard was unlikely. An expansion of examples of alternative strategies to address climate change could contribute towards transcending individualized approaches and accentuate perceptions of possibilities for significant social change.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1357climate changemitigation strategiespublic perceptionresponsibilityindividualization
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sarah Becker
Paul Sparks
spellingShingle Sarah Becker
Paul Sparks
Talking about Climate Change Mitigation: People’s Views on Different Levels of Action
Sustainability
climate change
mitigation strategies
public perception
responsibility
individualization
author_facet Sarah Becker
Paul Sparks
author_sort Sarah Becker
title Talking about Climate Change Mitigation: People’s Views on Different Levels of Action
title_short Talking about Climate Change Mitigation: People’s Views on Different Levels of Action
title_full Talking about Climate Change Mitigation: People’s Views on Different Levels of Action
title_fullStr Talking about Climate Change Mitigation: People’s Views on Different Levels of Action
title_full_unstemmed Talking about Climate Change Mitigation: People’s Views on Different Levels of Action
title_sort talking about climate change mitigation: people’s views on different levels of action
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Previous research has examined public views on climate change and pro-environmental behavior; however, there has been little focus on in-depth qualitative examination of views on mitigation strategies carried out by different social actors. This paper examines how people discuss strategies to mitigate climate change and the relative responsibilities of individuals, the UK government, and corporations. Twenty people were interviewed about what they thought should be done to reduce the degree of climate change. Three main themes in their responses are identified: (1) representations of climate change; (2) responsibility for action; and (3) opposing environmental and economic interests. Overall, there was support for a variety of climate change mitigation strategies. There was some emphasis on individual behavior change combined with suggestions about greater information provision and the importance of personal choice. Although some participants criticized economic and profit-oriented structures, there was a strong sense among participants that change in this regard was unlikely. An expansion of examples of alternative strategies to address climate change could contribute towards transcending individualized approaches and accentuate perceptions of possibilities for significant social change.
topic climate change
mitigation strategies
public perception
responsibility
individualization
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1357
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahbecker talkingaboutclimatechangemitigationpeoplesviewsondifferentlevelsofaction
AT paulsparks talkingaboutclimatechangemitigationpeoplesviewsondifferentlevelsofaction
_version_ 1725747931073478656