Optimal emission control under public port rivalry: A comparison of competitive and cooperative policy

This study examines the optimal emission control at two competing public ports. We first develop a two-stage duopoly model in which governments determine the emission standard that restrains shipping operators’ fuel quality and ports are involved in price competition, taking the emission standards a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin Hyosoo Park, Young-Tae Chang, Jasmine Siu Lee Lam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-01-01
Series:Maritime Transport Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666822X20300058
id doaj-4f16a99c4ccc48bdad5d8ca2b886b0c3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4f16a99c4ccc48bdad5d8ca2b886b0c32021-05-04T07:34:08ZengElsevierMaritime Transport Research2666-822X2020-01-011100005Optimal emission control under public port rivalry: A comparison of competitive and cooperative policyKevin Hyosoo Park0Young-Tae Chang1Jasmine Siu Lee Lam2Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USAGraduate School of Logistics, Inha University, Incheon, Korea & Korea Maritime Institute, Busan, Republic of KoreaSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore; Corresponding author.This study examines the optimal emission control at two competing public ports. We first develop a two-stage duopoly model in which governments determine the emission standard that restrains shipping operators’ fuel quality and ports are involved in price competition, taking the emission standards as given. Then, non-cooperative and cooperative emission control cases are analyzed. The main result of this study is surprising. The results suggest that shipping operators bear fuel cost, congestion externality cost, and port price. The port price comprises markups from market power, congestion externality, and emission externality cost. Regardless of cooperation and governments’ knowledge of port pricing, the emission standard is optimal if and only if shipping operators’ fuel cost equals the emission externality cost.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666822X20300058Emission controlPublic portsPort competitionNegative externalityPort pricing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kevin Hyosoo Park
Young-Tae Chang
Jasmine Siu Lee Lam
spellingShingle Kevin Hyosoo Park
Young-Tae Chang
Jasmine Siu Lee Lam
Optimal emission control under public port rivalry: A comparison of competitive and cooperative policy
Maritime Transport Research
Emission control
Public ports
Port competition
Negative externality
Port pricing
author_facet Kevin Hyosoo Park
Young-Tae Chang
Jasmine Siu Lee Lam
author_sort Kevin Hyosoo Park
title Optimal emission control under public port rivalry: A comparison of competitive and cooperative policy
title_short Optimal emission control under public port rivalry: A comparison of competitive and cooperative policy
title_full Optimal emission control under public port rivalry: A comparison of competitive and cooperative policy
title_fullStr Optimal emission control under public port rivalry: A comparison of competitive and cooperative policy
title_full_unstemmed Optimal emission control under public port rivalry: A comparison of competitive and cooperative policy
title_sort optimal emission control under public port rivalry: a comparison of competitive and cooperative policy
publisher Elsevier
series Maritime Transport Research
issn 2666-822X
publishDate 2020-01-01
description This study examines the optimal emission control at two competing public ports. We first develop a two-stage duopoly model in which governments determine the emission standard that restrains shipping operators’ fuel quality and ports are involved in price competition, taking the emission standards as given. Then, non-cooperative and cooperative emission control cases are analyzed. The main result of this study is surprising. The results suggest that shipping operators bear fuel cost, congestion externality cost, and port price. The port price comprises markups from market power, congestion externality, and emission externality cost. Regardless of cooperation and governments’ knowledge of port pricing, the emission standard is optimal if and only if shipping operators’ fuel cost equals the emission externality cost.
topic Emission control
Public ports
Port competition
Negative externality
Port pricing
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666822X20300058
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinhyosoopark optimalemissioncontrolunderpublicportrivalryacomparisonofcompetitiveandcooperativepolicy
AT youngtaechang optimalemissioncontrolunderpublicportrivalryacomparisonofcompetitiveandcooperativepolicy
AT jasminesiuleelam optimalemissioncontrolunderpublicportrivalryacomparisonofcompetitiveandcooperativepolicy
_version_ 1721479725750157312