A randomized control trial comparing buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with buccal and palatal infiltration of 2% lignocaine for the extraction of maxillary premolar teeth

A randomized control trial comparing buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with buccal and palatal infiltration of 2% lignocaine for the extraction of maxillary premolar teeth

Introduction: The use of articaine has been claimed to obviate the need for routine palatal local anesthetic injections on account of its better diffusion through soft and hard tissues as compared to other local anesthetic agents. Objective: The objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vikas Sandilya, Neelam Noel Andrade, Paul C Mathai, Neha Aggarwal, Vyankatesh Sahu, Shibani Nerurkar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
Subjects:
articaine
lignocaine
maxilla
premolar
single injection
Online Access:http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2019;volume=10;issue=2;spage=284;epage=288;aulast=Sandilya

Internet

http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2019;volume=10;issue=2;spage=284;epage=288;aulast=Sandilya

Similar Items