Stimulus Level during Endurance Training: Effects on Lactate Kinetics in Untrained Men

Background/Objective. Not only but particularly due to their time efficiency, High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) is becoming increasingly popular in fitness-oriented endurance sports. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a HIIT running program versus a Moderate Intensity Con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Tuttor, Simon von Stengel, Michael Hettchen, Wolfgang Kemmler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2018-01-01
Series:Journal of Sports Medicine
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3158949
id doaj-52ce4a32095b440f99f06e6e5bf39e69
record_format Article
spelling doaj-52ce4a32095b440f99f06e6e5bf39e692020-11-24T22:52:09ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Sports Medicine2356-76512314-61762018-01-01201810.1155/2018/31589493158949Stimulus Level during Endurance Training: Effects on Lactate Kinetics in Untrained MenMichael Tuttor0Simon von Stengel1Michael Hettchen2Wolfgang Kemmler3German Rugby-Union, Deutscher Rugby-Verband e.V. (DRV), Ferdinand-Wilhelm-Fricke-Weg 10, 30169 Hannover Rugby-Verband, GermanyInstitute of Medical Physics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Henkestrasse 91, 91052 Erlangen, GermanyInstitute of Medical Physics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Henkestrasse 91, 91052 Erlangen, GermanyInstitute of Medical Physics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Henkestrasse 91, 91052 Erlangen, GermanyBackground/Objective. Not only but particularly due to their time efficiency, High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) is becoming increasingly popular in fitness-oriented endurance sports. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a HIIT running program versus a Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise (MICE) training running program (16 weeks each) on lactate kinetics in untrained males. Methods. 65 healthy but untrained males (30-50 years, BMI: 27.2 ± 3.7kg/m2) were randomly assigned to either an HIIT (n=33) or a waiting-control/MICE group (n=32). HIIT consisted of intervals and intense continuous running bouts at or above the individual anaerobic threshold (IANS, 95-110% of IANS-HR), while MICE focused on continuous running at 70-82.5% IANS-HR. Both programs were adjusted for “total workload”. Study endpoints were time to IANS and time from IANS till “time to exhaustion” (TTE) as assessed by stepwise treadmill test. Results. In both exercise groups time to reach IANS (MICE: 320 ± 160 s versus HIIT: 198 ± 118 s) increased significantly (p<.001), with the groups differing significantly (p<.001). Time from IANS until TTE was prolonged significantly among the HIIT group (27 ± 66s, p=.030), while among the MICE group a significant reduction of time from IANS until TTE (59 ± 109s; p=.017) was determined. Between-group difference is significant (p=.003) for this parameter. In both groups TTE increased significantly (HIIT: 27.2 ± 17.7% versus MICE: 29.0 ± 19.4%, both p<.001) at a similar level (p=.279). Conclusion. HIIT and MICE protocols, when adjusted for total workload, similarly increased running performance in untrained male subjects; however, the underlying mechanisms differ fundamentally. Due to its effects on aerobic and anaerobic performance improvement, HIIT can be recommended for untrained individuals as a time-efficient alternative or complementary training method to MICE. However, our protocol did not confirm the general superiority of HIIT versus MICE on the key endurance parameter “time to exhaustion” that has been reported by other comparative exercise studies.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3158949
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael Tuttor
Simon von Stengel
Michael Hettchen
Wolfgang Kemmler
spellingShingle Michael Tuttor
Simon von Stengel
Michael Hettchen
Wolfgang Kemmler
Stimulus Level during Endurance Training: Effects on Lactate Kinetics in Untrained Men
Journal of Sports Medicine
author_facet Michael Tuttor
Simon von Stengel
Michael Hettchen
Wolfgang Kemmler
author_sort Michael Tuttor
title Stimulus Level during Endurance Training: Effects on Lactate Kinetics in Untrained Men
title_short Stimulus Level during Endurance Training: Effects on Lactate Kinetics in Untrained Men
title_full Stimulus Level during Endurance Training: Effects on Lactate Kinetics in Untrained Men
title_fullStr Stimulus Level during Endurance Training: Effects on Lactate Kinetics in Untrained Men
title_full_unstemmed Stimulus Level during Endurance Training: Effects on Lactate Kinetics in Untrained Men
title_sort stimulus level during endurance training: effects on lactate kinetics in untrained men
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Sports Medicine
issn 2356-7651
2314-6176
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Background/Objective. Not only but particularly due to their time efficiency, High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) is becoming increasingly popular in fitness-oriented endurance sports. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a HIIT running program versus a Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise (MICE) training running program (16 weeks each) on lactate kinetics in untrained males. Methods. 65 healthy but untrained males (30-50 years, BMI: 27.2 ± 3.7kg/m2) were randomly assigned to either an HIIT (n=33) or a waiting-control/MICE group (n=32). HIIT consisted of intervals and intense continuous running bouts at or above the individual anaerobic threshold (IANS, 95-110% of IANS-HR), while MICE focused on continuous running at 70-82.5% IANS-HR. Both programs were adjusted for “total workload”. Study endpoints were time to IANS and time from IANS till “time to exhaustion” (TTE) as assessed by stepwise treadmill test. Results. In both exercise groups time to reach IANS (MICE: 320 ± 160 s versus HIIT: 198 ± 118 s) increased significantly (p<.001), with the groups differing significantly (p<.001). Time from IANS until TTE was prolonged significantly among the HIIT group (27 ± 66s, p=.030), while among the MICE group a significant reduction of time from IANS until TTE (59 ± 109s; p=.017) was determined. Between-group difference is significant (p=.003) for this parameter. In both groups TTE increased significantly (HIIT: 27.2 ± 17.7% versus MICE: 29.0 ± 19.4%, both p<.001) at a similar level (p=.279). Conclusion. HIIT and MICE protocols, when adjusted for total workload, similarly increased running performance in untrained male subjects; however, the underlying mechanisms differ fundamentally. Due to its effects on aerobic and anaerobic performance improvement, HIIT can be recommended for untrained individuals as a time-efficient alternative or complementary training method to MICE. However, our protocol did not confirm the general superiority of HIIT versus MICE on the key endurance parameter “time to exhaustion” that has been reported by other comparative exercise studies.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3158949
work_keys_str_mv AT michaeltuttor stimuluslevelduringendurancetrainingeffectsonlactatekineticsinuntrainedmen
AT simonvonstengel stimuluslevelduringendurancetrainingeffectsonlactatekineticsinuntrainedmen
AT michaelhettchen stimuluslevelduringendurancetrainingeffectsonlactatekineticsinuntrainedmen
AT wolfgangkemmler stimuluslevelduringendurancetrainingeffectsonlactatekineticsinuntrainedmen
_version_ 1725666863600369664