A randomised investigation of journal responses to academic and journalist enquiry about possible scientific misconduct

Abstract Objective We investigated whether responses about possible scientific misconduct from journals to journalists would differ in speed, usefulness, and tone from responses to academics. Twelve journals that published 23 clinical trials about which concerns had been previously raised were rando...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark J. Bolland, Alison Avenell, Greg D. Gamble, Stephen Buranyi, Andrew Grey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-07-01
Series:BMC Research Notes
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-018-3613-1