Ações e indicadores da construção do argumento em aula de Ciências

In this paper, we present some ideas concerning the use of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern (TAP) in research on science teaching. We support studies in the area that mention the possible inadequacy of this standard when used to analyze the interactions occurring in the classroom. We believe that its use...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lúcia Helena Sasseron, Anna Maria Pessoa de Carvalho
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais 2013-01-01
Series:Ensaio Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências
Online Access:http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=129528214011
id doaj-5700252c64eb4e219030ce1003b7dce4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5700252c64eb4e219030ce1003b7dce42020-11-24T22:20:14ZspaUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisEnsaio Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências1415-21502013-01-01152169189Ações e indicadores da construção do argumento em aula de CiênciasLúcia Helena SasseronAnna Maria Pessoa de CarvalhoIn this paper, we present some ideas concerning the use of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern (TAP) in research on science teaching. We support studies in the area that mention the possible inadequacy of this standard when used to analyze the interactions occurring in the classroom. We believe that its use in our research can be better used when we insert elements directly related to science education. In this paper, we propose an analysis focused both on the responses of the students and the teacher’s actions to foster discussions that occurred in the classroom. In addition to TAP, in our analysis, we use categories proposed for the study of discursive interactions occurring in science classrooms: to analyze the speech of students, we use indicators of Scientific Literacy, and to analyze the actions of the teacher, we propose new categories that directly relate to the promotion of research and argumentation in the classroom. Based on these results, we conclude that the establishment of correlation between facts and ideas (not regarded by TAP) is an essential step for the construction of argument in science classes.http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=129528214011
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lúcia Helena Sasseron
Anna Maria Pessoa de Carvalho
spellingShingle Lúcia Helena Sasseron
Anna Maria Pessoa de Carvalho
Ações e indicadores da construção do argumento em aula de Ciências
Ensaio Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências
author_facet Lúcia Helena Sasseron
Anna Maria Pessoa de Carvalho
author_sort Lúcia Helena Sasseron
title Ações e indicadores da construção do argumento em aula de Ciências
title_short Ações e indicadores da construção do argumento em aula de Ciências
title_full Ações e indicadores da construção do argumento em aula de Ciências
title_fullStr Ações e indicadores da construção do argumento em aula de Ciências
title_full_unstemmed Ações e indicadores da construção do argumento em aula de Ciências
title_sort ações e indicadores da construção do argumento em aula de ciências
publisher Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
series Ensaio Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências
issn 1415-2150
publishDate 2013-01-01
description In this paper, we present some ideas concerning the use of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern (TAP) in research on science teaching. We support studies in the area that mention the possible inadequacy of this standard when used to analyze the interactions occurring in the classroom. We believe that its use in our research can be better used when we insert elements directly related to science education. In this paper, we propose an analysis focused both on the responses of the students and the teacher’s actions to foster discussions that occurred in the classroom. In addition to TAP, in our analysis, we use categories proposed for the study of discursive interactions occurring in science classrooms: to analyze the speech of students, we use indicators of Scientific Literacy, and to analyze the actions of the teacher, we propose new categories that directly relate to the promotion of research and argumentation in the classroom. Based on these results, we conclude that the establishment of correlation between facts and ideas (not regarded by TAP) is an essential step for the construction of argument in science classes.
url http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=129528214011
work_keys_str_mv AT luciahelenasasseron acoeseindicadoresdaconstrucaodoargumentoemauladeciencias
AT annamariapessoadecarvalho acoeseindicadoresdaconstrucaodoargumentoemauladeciencias
_version_ 1725776235390304256