Interface matters: the stiffness route to stability of a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase.
In this work we investigate by computational means the behavior of two orthologous bacterial proteins, a mesophilic and a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase (MalDH), at different temperatures. Namely, we quantify how protein mechanical rigidity at different length- and time-scales correlat...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4250060?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-57ff500d3589400986992b0e514a52c8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-57ff500d3589400986992b0e514a52c82020-11-24T21:50:56ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01912e11389510.1371/journal.pone.0113895Interface matters: the stiffness route to stability of a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase.Maria KalimeriEric GirardDominique MadernFabio SterponeIn this work we investigate by computational means the behavior of two orthologous bacterial proteins, a mesophilic and a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase (MalDH), at different temperatures. Namely, we quantify how protein mechanical rigidity at different length- and time-scales correlates to protein thermophilicity as commonly believed. In particular by using a clustering analysis strategy to explore the conformational space of the folded proteins, we show that at ambient conditions and at the molecular length-scale the thermophilic variant is indeed more rigid that the mesophilic one. This rigidification is the result of more efficient inter-domain interactions, the strength of which is further quantified via ad hoc free energy calculations. When considered isolated, the thermophilic domain is indeed more flexible than the respective mesophilic one. Upon oligomerization, the induced stiffening of the thermophilic protein propagates from the interface to the active site where the loop, controlling the access to the catalytic pocket, anchors down via an extended network of ion-pairs. On the contrary in the mesophilic tetramer the loop is highly mobile. Simulations at high temperature, could not re-activate the mobility of the loop in the thermophile. This finding opens questions on the similarities of the binding processes for these two homologues at their optimal working temperature and suggests for the thermophilic variant a possible cooperative role of cofactor/substrate.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4250060?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Maria Kalimeri Eric Girard Dominique Madern Fabio Sterpone |
spellingShingle |
Maria Kalimeri Eric Girard Dominique Madern Fabio Sterpone Interface matters: the stiffness route to stability of a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Maria Kalimeri Eric Girard Dominique Madern Fabio Sterpone |
author_sort |
Maria Kalimeri |
title |
Interface matters: the stiffness route to stability of a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase. |
title_short |
Interface matters: the stiffness route to stability of a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase. |
title_full |
Interface matters: the stiffness route to stability of a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase. |
title_fullStr |
Interface matters: the stiffness route to stability of a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Interface matters: the stiffness route to stability of a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase. |
title_sort |
interface matters: the stiffness route to stability of a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
In this work we investigate by computational means the behavior of two orthologous bacterial proteins, a mesophilic and a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase (MalDH), at different temperatures. Namely, we quantify how protein mechanical rigidity at different length- and time-scales correlates to protein thermophilicity as commonly believed. In particular by using a clustering analysis strategy to explore the conformational space of the folded proteins, we show that at ambient conditions and at the molecular length-scale the thermophilic variant is indeed more rigid that the mesophilic one. This rigidification is the result of more efficient inter-domain interactions, the strength of which is further quantified via ad hoc free energy calculations. When considered isolated, the thermophilic domain is indeed more flexible than the respective mesophilic one. Upon oligomerization, the induced stiffening of the thermophilic protein propagates from the interface to the active site where the loop, controlling the access to the catalytic pocket, anchors down via an extended network of ion-pairs. On the contrary in the mesophilic tetramer the loop is highly mobile. Simulations at high temperature, could not re-activate the mobility of the loop in the thermophile. This finding opens questions on the similarities of the binding processes for these two homologues at their optimal working temperature and suggests for the thermophilic variant a possible cooperative role of cofactor/substrate. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4250060?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mariakalimeri interfacemattersthestiffnessroutetostabilityofathermophilictetramericmalatedehydrogenase AT ericgirard interfacemattersthestiffnessroutetostabilityofathermophilictetramericmalatedehydrogenase AT dominiquemadern interfacemattersthestiffnessroutetostabilityofathermophilictetramericmalatedehydrogenase AT fabiosterpone interfacemattersthestiffnessroutetostabilityofathermophilictetramericmalatedehydrogenase |
_version_ |
1725881503095717888 |