Interface matters: the stiffness route to stability of a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase.

In this work we investigate by computational means the behavior of two orthologous bacterial proteins, a mesophilic and a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase (MalDH), at different temperatures. Namely, we quantify how protein mechanical rigidity at different length- and time-scales correlat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Kalimeri, Eric Girard, Dominique Madern, Fabio Sterpone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4250060?pdf=render
id doaj-57ff500d3589400986992b0e514a52c8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-57ff500d3589400986992b0e514a52c82020-11-24T21:50:56ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01912e11389510.1371/journal.pone.0113895Interface matters: the stiffness route to stability of a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase.Maria KalimeriEric GirardDominique MadernFabio SterponeIn this work we investigate by computational means the behavior of two orthologous bacterial proteins, a mesophilic and a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase (MalDH), at different temperatures. Namely, we quantify how protein mechanical rigidity at different length- and time-scales correlates to protein thermophilicity as commonly believed. In particular by using a clustering analysis strategy to explore the conformational space of the folded proteins, we show that at ambient conditions and at the molecular length-scale the thermophilic variant is indeed more rigid that the mesophilic one. This rigidification is the result of more efficient inter-domain interactions, the strength of which is further quantified via ad hoc free energy calculations. When considered isolated, the thermophilic domain is indeed more flexible than the respective mesophilic one. Upon oligomerization, the induced stiffening of the thermophilic protein propagates from the interface to the active site where the loop, controlling the access to the catalytic pocket, anchors down via an extended network of ion-pairs. On the contrary in the mesophilic tetramer the loop is highly mobile. Simulations at high temperature, could not re-activate the mobility of the loop in the thermophile. This finding opens questions on the similarities of the binding processes for these two homologues at their optimal working temperature and suggests for the thermophilic variant a possible cooperative role of cofactor/substrate.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4250060?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maria Kalimeri
Eric Girard
Dominique Madern
Fabio Sterpone
spellingShingle Maria Kalimeri
Eric Girard
Dominique Madern
Fabio Sterpone
Interface matters: the stiffness route to stability of a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Maria Kalimeri
Eric Girard
Dominique Madern
Fabio Sterpone
author_sort Maria Kalimeri
title Interface matters: the stiffness route to stability of a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase.
title_short Interface matters: the stiffness route to stability of a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase.
title_full Interface matters: the stiffness route to stability of a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase.
title_fullStr Interface matters: the stiffness route to stability of a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase.
title_full_unstemmed Interface matters: the stiffness route to stability of a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase.
title_sort interface matters: the stiffness route to stability of a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description In this work we investigate by computational means the behavior of two orthologous bacterial proteins, a mesophilic and a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase (MalDH), at different temperatures. Namely, we quantify how protein mechanical rigidity at different length- and time-scales correlates to protein thermophilicity as commonly believed. In particular by using a clustering analysis strategy to explore the conformational space of the folded proteins, we show that at ambient conditions and at the molecular length-scale the thermophilic variant is indeed more rigid that the mesophilic one. This rigidification is the result of more efficient inter-domain interactions, the strength of which is further quantified via ad hoc free energy calculations. When considered isolated, the thermophilic domain is indeed more flexible than the respective mesophilic one. Upon oligomerization, the induced stiffening of the thermophilic protein propagates from the interface to the active site where the loop, controlling the access to the catalytic pocket, anchors down via an extended network of ion-pairs. On the contrary in the mesophilic tetramer the loop is highly mobile. Simulations at high temperature, could not re-activate the mobility of the loop in the thermophile. This finding opens questions on the similarities of the binding processes for these two homologues at their optimal working temperature and suggests for the thermophilic variant a possible cooperative role of cofactor/substrate.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4250060?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT mariakalimeri interfacemattersthestiffnessroutetostabilityofathermophilictetramericmalatedehydrogenase
AT ericgirard interfacemattersthestiffnessroutetostabilityofathermophilictetramericmalatedehydrogenase
AT dominiquemadern interfacemattersthestiffnessroutetostabilityofathermophilictetramericmalatedehydrogenase
AT fabiosterpone interfacemattersthestiffnessroutetostabilityofathermophilictetramericmalatedehydrogenase
_version_ 1725881503095717888