School size, student achievement, and the "power rating" of poverty: Substantive finding or statistical artifact?

The proportion of variance in student achievement that is explained by student SES-"poverty's power rating," as some call it-tends to be lower among smaller schools than among larger schools. Smaller schools, many claim, are able to somehow disrupt the seemingly axiomatic association...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Theodore Coladarci
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Arizona State University 2006-11-01
Series:Education Policy Analysis Archives
Subjects:
Online Access:http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/99
id doaj-585ac5bf32a2406cbce3bfa9859a31b5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-585ac5bf32a2406cbce3bfa9859a31b52020-11-25T02:49:31ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412006-11-011428School size, student achievement, and the "power rating" of poverty: Substantive finding or statistical artifact?Theodore ColadarciThe proportion of variance in student achievement that is explained by student SES-"poverty's power rating," as some call it-tends to be lower among smaller schools than among larger schools. Smaller schools, many claim, are able to somehow disrupt the seemingly axiomatic association between SES and student achievement. Using eighth-grade data for 216 public schools in Maine, I explored the hypothesis that this in part is a statistical artifact of the greater volatility (lower reliability) of school-aggregated student achievement in smaller schools. This hypothesis received no support when reading achievement served as the dependent variable. In contrast, the hypothesis was supported when the dependent variable was mathematics achievement. For reasons considered in the discussion, however, I ultimately concluded that the latter results are insufficient to affirm the statistical-artifact hypothesis here as well. Implications for subsequent research are discussed. http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/99small schoolsstudent achievementsocioeconomic status, rural education.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Theodore Coladarci
spellingShingle Theodore Coladarci
School size, student achievement, and the "power rating" of poverty: Substantive finding or statistical artifact?
Education Policy Analysis Archives
small schools
student achievement
socioeconomic status
, rural education.
author_facet Theodore Coladarci
author_sort Theodore Coladarci
title School size, student achievement, and the "power rating" of poverty: Substantive finding or statistical artifact?
title_short School size, student achievement, and the "power rating" of poverty: Substantive finding or statistical artifact?
title_full School size, student achievement, and the "power rating" of poverty: Substantive finding or statistical artifact?
title_fullStr School size, student achievement, and the "power rating" of poverty: Substantive finding or statistical artifact?
title_full_unstemmed School size, student achievement, and the "power rating" of poverty: Substantive finding or statistical artifact?
title_sort school size, student achievement, and the "power rating" of poverty: substantive finding or statistical artifact?
publisher Arizona State University
series Education Policy Analysis Archives
issn 1068-2341
publishDate 2006-11-01
description The proportion of variance in student achievement that is explained by student SES-"poverty's power rating," as some call it-tends to be lower among smaller schools than among larger schools. Smaller schools, many claim, are able to somehow disrupt the seemingly axiomatic association between SES and student achievement. Using eighth-grade data for 216 public schools in Maine, I explored the hypothesis that this in part is a statistical artifact of the greater volatility (lower reliability) of school-aggregated student achievement in smaller schools. This hypothesis received no support when reading achievement served as the dependent variable. In contrast, the hypothesis was supported when the dependent variable was mathematics achievement. For reasons considered in the discussion, however, I ultimately concluded that the latter results are insufficient to affirm the statistical-artifact hypothesis here as well. Implications for subsequent research are discussed.
topic small schools
student achievement
socioeconomic status
, rural education.
url http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/99
work_keys_str_mv AT theodorecoladarci schoolsizestudentachievementandthepowerratingofpovertysubstantivefindingorstatisticalartifact
_version_ 1724742925489799168