L’approche bilingue et l’apprentissage de la lecture chez les sourds

Abstract The bilingual and bicultural approach in the education of deaf students causes a growing interest in deaf communities, specialists, and deaf children’ parents (Cummins and Danesi, 1990; Mahshie, 1995). This approach is based, among other things, on the role of L1 (sign language) on the l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Daigle, Françoise Armand
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Carleton University 2004-06-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Online Access:https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/19790
id doaj-58ca8cd85b464bdf8cd0de38f9b97309
record_format Article
spelling doaj-58ca8cd85b464bdf8cd0de38f9b973092021-03-02T03:57:00ZengCarleton UniversityCanadian Journal of Applied Linguistics1481-868X1920-18182004-06-01712338L’approche bilingue et l’apprentissage de la lecture chez les sourdsDaniel Daigle0Françoise Armand1Universite de Montr ´ eal ´Universite de Montr ´ eal ´Abstract The bilingual and bicultural approach in the education of deaf students causes a growing interest in deaf communities, specialists, and deaf children’ parents (Cummins and Danesi, 1990; Mahshie, 1995). This approach is based, among other things, on the role of L1 (sign language) on the learning experience in L2 (majority language). According to the supporters of this approach, a deaf pupil who know enough a sign language before starting school would benefit from this experience in later majority language acquisition, notably in reading. In this paper, we will present the bilingual and bicultural approach by defining first what reading is, especially in terms of words recognition processes, and then by questioning the role played by the sign language in reading acquisition among deaf students. We will defend the idea that the early acquisition of a sign language is capital (Virole, 1993s; Padden and Ramsey, 1998; Strong and Printz, 2000) and that phonology awareness of the majority language is essential to reading success (Musselman, 2000; Perfetti and Sandak, 2000).https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/19790
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel Daigle
Françoise Armand
spellingShingle Daniel Daigle
Françoise Armand
L’approche bilingue et l’apprentissage de la lecture chez les sourds
Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics
author_facet Daniel Daigle
Françoise Armand
author_sort Daniel Daigle
title L’approche bilingue et l’apprentissage de la lecture chez les sourds
title_short L’approche bilingue et l’apprentissage de la lecture chez les sourds
title_full L’approche bilingue et l’apprentissage de la lecture chez les sourds
title_fullStr L’approche bilingue et l’apprentissage de la lecture chez les sourds
title_full_unstemmed L’approche bilingue et l’apprentissage de la lecture chez les sourds
title_sort l’approche bilingue et l’apprentissage de la lecture chez les sourds
publisher Carleton University
series Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics
issn 1481-868X
1920-1818
publishDate 2004-06-01
description Abstract The bilingual and bicultural approach in the education of deaf students causes a growing interest in deaf communities, specialists, and deaf children’ parents (Cummins and Danesi, 1990; Mahshie, 1995). This approach is based, among other things, on the role of L1 (sign language) on the learning experience in L2 (majority language). According to the supporters of this approach, a deaf pupil who know enough a sign language before starting school would benefit from this experience in later majority language acquisition, notably in reading. In this paper, we will present the bilingual and bicultural approach by defining first what reading is, especially in terms of words recognition processes, and then by questioning the role played by the sign language in reading acquisition among deaf students. We will defend the idea that the early acquisition of a sign language is capital (Virole, 1993s; Padden and Ramsey, 1998; Strong and Printz, 2000) and that phonology awareness of the majority language is essential to reading success (Musselman, 2000; Perfetti and Sandak, 2000).
url https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/19790
work_keys_str_mv AT danieldaigle lapprochebilingueetlapprentissagedelalecturechezlessourds
AT francoisearmand lapprochebilingueetlapprentissagedelalecturechezlessourds
_version_ 1724243387147616256