Designing a Revenue Sharing Contract under Information Asymmetry

In a supply chain coordinated by a revenue sharing contract, under-reporting of sales revenue has been a common practice amongst retailers who always have private information about the market demand. In this article, we aim to design a mechanism to mitigate this problem. One may design a contract to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jaimini Bhattacharyya, Rahul R. Marathe, G. Srinivasan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences 2020-10-01
Series:International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ijmems.in/volumes/volume5/number5/64-IJMEMS-20-56-5-5-820-834-2020.pdf
id doaj-5b1e0e8bbf4e44488ddaf556cdd1a676
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5b1e0e8bbf4e44488ddaf556cdd1a6762020-11-25T02:58:37ZengInternational Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management SciencesInternational Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences2455-77492455-77492020-10-015582083410.33889/IJMEMS.2020.5.5.064Designing a Revenue Sharing Contract under Information AsymmetryJaimini Bhattacharyya0Rahul R. Marathe1G. Srinivasan2Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, IndiaDepartment of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, IndiaDepartment of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, IndiaIn a supply chain coordinated by a revenue sharing contract, under-reporting of sales revenue has been a common practice amongst retailers who always have private information about the market demand. In this article, we aim to design a mechanism to mitigate this problem. One may design a contract to elicit truthful information from the retailer while maximizing supplier’s payoff. However, we find that such contracts fail to coordinate the supply chain, when the market demand is high. Hence, we study an audit-based revenue sharing contract. First, we design a laboratory experiment to investigate the impact of retailer’s decisions on the subsequent choices made by the supplier. We find that the audit probability chosen by the supplier increases with the gap between retailer’s order quantity and the sales reported by the retailer. We follow this up with a simulation experiment which incorporates the findings of our laboratory experiment. Audit cost and the penalty announced by the supplier for not reporting true sales turned out to be important in making decisions for both the players. We also find the threshold auditing cost beyond which auditing is not economically viable for the supplier.https://www.ijmems.in/volumes/volume5/number5/64-IJMEMS-20-56-5-5-820-834-2020.pdfsupply chainrevenue sharing contractinformation asymmetrydishonesty
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jaimini Bhattacharyya
Rahul R. Marathe
G. Srinivasan
spellingShingle Jaimini Bhattacharyya
Rahul R. Marathe
G. Srinivasan
Designing a Revenue Sharing Contract under Information Asymmetry
International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences
supply chain
revenue sharing contract
information asymmetry
dishonesty
author_facet Jaimini Bhattacharyya
Rahul R. Marathe
G. Srinivasan
author_sort Jaimini Bhattacharyya
title Designing a Revenue Sharing Contract under Information Asymmetry
title_short Designing a Revenue Sharing Contract under Information Asymmetry
title_full Designing a Revenue Sharing Contract under Information Asymmetry
title_fullStr Designing a Revenue Sharing Contract under Information Asymmetry
title_full_unstemmed Designing a Revenue Sharing Contract under Information Asymmetry
title_sort designing a revenue sharing contract under information asymmetry
publisher International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences
series International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences
issn 2455-7749
2455-7749
publishDate 2020-10-01
description In a supply chain coordinated by a revenue sharing contract, under-reporting of sales revenue has been a common practice amongst retailers who always have private information about the market demand. In this article, we aim to design a mechanism to mitigate this problem. One may design a contract to elicit truthful information from the retailer while maximizing supplier’s payoff. However, we find that such contracts fail to coordinate the supply chain, when the market demand is high. Hence, we study an audit-based revenue sharing contract. First, we design a laboratory experiment to investigate the impact of retailer’s decisions on the subsequent choices made by the supplier. We find that the audit probability chosen by the supplier increases with the gap between retailer’s order quantity and the sales reported by the retailer. We follow this up with a simulation experiment which incorporates the findings of our laboratory experiment. Audit cost and the penalty announced by the supplier for not reporting true sales turned out to be important in making decisions for both the players. We also find the threshold auditing cost beyond which auditing is not economically viable for the supplier.
topic supply chain
revenue sharing contract
information asymmetry
dishonesty
url https://www.ijmems.in/volumes/volume5/number5/64-IJMEMS-20-56-5-5-820-834-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jaiminibhattacharyya designingarevenuesharingcontractunderinformationasymmetry
AT rahulrmarathe designingarevenuesharingcontractunderinformationasymmetry
AT gsrinivasan designingarevenuesharingcontractunderinformationasymmetry
_version_ 1724705976667340800