Comparison of the effects of cold water and ice ingestion on endurance cycling capacity in the heat

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of pre-cooling and fluid replacement with either crushed ice or cold water. Methods: On 2 separate occasions, in a counterbalanced order, 9 recreationally-trained males ingested 1.25 g/kg (80–100 g) of either crushed ice (0.5°C) or cold w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takashi Naito, Tetsuro Ogaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-03-01
Series:Journal of Sport and Health Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095254615001258
id doaj-5f291b88575240558ada0e8bc4ddf867
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f291b88575240558ada0e8bc4ddf8672020-11-24T23:21:11ZengElsevierJournal of Sport and Health Science2095-25462017-03-016111111710.1016/j.jshs.2015.12.002Comparison of the effects of cold water and ice ingestion on endurance cycling capacity in the heatTakashi NaitoTetsuro OgakiPurpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of pre-cooling and fluid replacement with either crushed ice or cold water. Methods: On 2 separate occasions, in a counterbalanced order, 9 recreationally-trained males ingested 1.25 g/kg (80–100 g) of either crushed ice (0.5°C) or cold water (4°C) every 5 min for 30 min before exercise. They also ingested 2.0 g/kg (130–160 g) of the same treatment drink at 15 min, 30 min, and 45 min after the commencement of cycling to exhaustion at 60%VO2max until voluntary exhaustion in a hot environment (35°C and 30% relative humidity). Results: The cycling time to exhaustion in the crushed ice trial (50.0 ± 12.2 min) was longer than the cold water trial (42.2 ± 10.1 min; p = 0.02). Although the rectal temperature fell by 0.37°C ± 0.03°C (p = 0.01) at the end of the resting period after the crushed ice ingestion, the rates of rise in rectal temperature during the exercise period were not significantly different between these 2 conditions (crushed ice: 0.23°C ± 0.07°C, 5 min; cold water: 0.22°C ± 0.07°C, 5 min; p = 0.94). Conclusion: Crushed ice ingestion before and during exercise in a hot environment may be a preferred and effective approach for minimizing thermal strain, and for improving endurance performance as compared with cold water ingestion.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095254615001258Cold water ingestionPre-coolingRectal temperatureThermoregulation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Takashi Naito
Tetsuro Ogaki
spellingShingle Takashi Naito
Tetsuro Ogaki
Comparison of the effects of cold water and ice ingestion on endurance cycling capacity in the heat
Journal of Sport and Health Science
Cold water ingestion
Pre-cooling
Rectal temperature
Thermoregulation
author_facet Takashi Naito
Tetsuro Ogaki
author_sort Takashi Naito
title Comparison of the effects of cold water and ice ingestion on endurance cycling capacity in the heat
title_short Comparison of the effects of cold water and ice ingestion on endurance cycling capacity in the heat
title_full Comparison of the effects of cold water and ice ingestion on endurance cycling capacity in the heat
title_fullStr Comparison of the effects of cold water and ice ingestion on endurance cycling capacity in the heat
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effects of cold water and ice ingestion on endurance cycling capacity in the heat
title_sort comparison of the effects of cold water and ice ingestion on endurance cycling capacity in the heat
publisher Elsevier
series Journal of Sport and Health Science
issn 2095-2546
publishDate 2017-03-01
description Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of pre-cooling and fluid replacement with either crushed ice or cold water. Methods: On 2 separate occasions, in a counterbalanced order, 9 recreationally-trained males ingested 1.25 g/kg (80–100 g) of either crushed ice (0.5°C) or cold water (4°C) every 5 min for 30 min before exercise. They also ingested 2.0 g/kg (130–160 g) of the same treatment drink at 15 min, 30 min, and 45 min after the commencement of cycling to exhaustion at 60%VO2max until voluntary exhaustion in a hot environment (35°C and 30% relative humidity). Results: The cycling time to exhaustion in the crushed ice trial (50.0 ± 12.2 min) was longer than the cold water trial (42.2 ± 10.1 min; p = 0.02). Although the rectal temperature fell by 0.37°C ± 0.03°C (p = 0.01) at the end of the resting period after the crushed ice ingestion, the rates of rise in rectal temperature during the exercise period were not significantly different between these 2 conditions (crushed ice: 0.23°C ± 0.07°C, 5 min; cold water: 0.22°C ± 0.07°C, 5 min; p = 0.94). Conclusion: Crushed ice ingestion before and during exercise in a hot environment may be a preferred and effective approach for minimizing thermal strain, and for improving endurance performance as compared with cold water ingestion.
topic Cold water ingestion
Pre-cooling
Rectal temperature
Thermoregulation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095254615001258
work_keys_str_mv AT takashinaito comparisonoftheeffectsofcoldwaterandiceingestiononendurancecyclingcapacityintheheat
AT tetsuroogaki comparisonoftheeffectsofcoldwaterandiceingestiononendurancecyclingcapacityintheheat
_version_ 1725572370514575360