Are editors of ecological journals good oracles? A reply to Schimel et al. (2014) about the malpractice of editorial rejections
In an earlier work, we found that 66% of manuscripts that suffered editorial rejections were finally accepted in journals of similar ranking to which they were originally submitted. We thus concluded that editors appear to be “poor oracles” with regards to being able evaluate the quality of a manusc...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Queen's University
2015-03-01
|
| Series: | Ideas in Ecology and Evolution |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/IEE/article/view/5514 |