Unlearnable phonotactics

The Subregular Hypothesis (Heinz 2010) states that only patterns with specific subregular computational properties are phonologically learnable. Lai (2015) provided the initial laboratory support for this hypothesis. The current study aimed to replicate and extend the earlier findings by using a dif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Enes Avcu, Arild Hestvik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2020-06-01
Series:Glossa
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/892
id doaj-69173f1ed232464aa9983b9e4f04c4f5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-69173f1ed232464aa9983b9e4f04c4f52021-09-02T11:24:34ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352020-06-015110.5334/gjgl.892505Unlearnable phonotacticsEnes Avcu0Arild Hestvik1Department of Neurology, The Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MAUniversity of Delaware, Newark, DEThe Subregular Hypothesis (Heinz 2010) states that only patterns with specific subregular computational properties are phonologically learnable. Lai (2015) provided the initial laboratory support for this hypothesis. The current study aimed to replicate and extend the earlier findings by using a different experimental paradigm (oddball task) and a different measure of learning (sensitivity index, 'd'′). Specifically, we compared the learnability of two phonotactic patterns that differ computationally and typologically: a simple rule (“First-Last Assimilation”) that requires agreement between the first and last segment of a word (predicted to be unlearnable), and a harmony rule (“Sibilant Harmony”) that requires the agreement of features throughout the word (predicted to be learnable). The First-Last Assimilation rule was tested under two experimental conditions: one where the training data were also consistent with the Sibilant Harmony rule, and one where the training data were only consistent with the First-Last rule. As in Lai (2015), we found that participants were significantly more sensitive to violations of the Sibilant Harmony (SH) rule than to the First-Last Assimilation (FL) rules. However, unlike Lai (2015), we also found that participants showed some residual sensitivity to the First-Last rule, but that sensitivity interacted with rule type so that participants were significantly more sensitive to SH rule violations. We conclude that participants in Artificial Grammar Learning experiments exhibit evidence of Universal Grammar constraining their learning, but patterns predicted to be unlearnable as a linguistic system can still be learned to some degree, due to non-linguistic learning mechanisms.https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/892phonotacticslearnabilitycomputational complexitysubregular hypothesisdomain specificity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Enes Avcu
Arild Hestvik
spellingShingle Enes Avcu
Arild Hestvik
Unlearnable phonotactics
Glossa
phonotactics
learnability
computational complexity
subregular hypothesis
domain specificity
author_facet Enes Avcu
Arild Hestvik
author_sort Enes Avcu
title Unlearnable phonotactics
title_short Unlearnable phonotactics
title_full Unlearnable phonotactics
title_fullStr Unlearnable phonotactics
title_full_unstemmed Unlearnable phonotactics
title_sort unlearnable phonotactics
publisher Open Library of Humanities
series Glossa
issn 2397-1835
publishDate 2020-06-01
description The Subregular Hypothesis (Heinz 2010) states that only patterns with specific subregular computational properties are phonologically learnable. Lai (2015) provided the initial laboratory support for this hypothesis. The current study aimed to replicate and extend the earlier findings by using a different experimental paradigm (oddball task) and a different measure of learning (sensitivity index, 'd'′). Specifically, we compared the learnability of two phonotactic patterns that differ computationally and typologically: a simple rule (“First-Last Assimilation”) that requires agreement between the first and last segment of a word (predicted to be unlearnable), and a harmony rule (“Sibilant Harmony”) that requires the agreement of features throughout the word (predicted to be learnable). The First-Last Assimilation rule was tested under two experimental conditions: one where the training data were also consistent with the Sibilant Harmony rule, and one where the training data were only consistent with the First-Last rule. As in Lai (2015), we found that participants were significantly more sensitive to violations of the Sibilant Harmony (SH) rule than to the First-Last Assimilation (FL) rules. However, unlike Lai (2015), we also found that participants showed some residual sensitivity to the First-Last rule, but that sensitivity interacted with rule type so that participants were significantly more sensitive to SH rule violations. We conclude that participants in Artificial Grammar Learning experiments exhibit evidence of Universal Grammar constraining their learning, but patterns predicted to be unlearnable as a linguistic system can still be learned to some degree, due to non-linguistic learning mechanisms.
topic phonotactics
learnability
computational complexity
subregular hypothesis
domain specificity
url https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/892
work_keys_str_mv AT enesavcu unlearnablephonotactics
AT arildhestvik unlearnablephonotactics
_version_ 1721176026463076352