Crossing hierarchies in organizations: Making sense of employee dissent and circumvention on internal social media

This paper explores how and why visibility and persistence factors affect employee communication on internal social media (ISM) and influence organizational dissent. This study presents findings from a single case study conducted at a Danish bank. Discussions initiated by employees on ISM were stud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vibeke Thøis Madsen
Format: Article
Language:Danish
Published: Aalborg Universitetsforlag 2019-11-01
Series:Globe
Online Access:https://somaesthetics.aau.dk/index.php/globe/article/view/3521
id doaj-6c6c8ebc0b3a403e8e01b23ee1e781ac
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6c6c8ebc0b3a403e8e01b23ee1e781ac2021-02-27T14:17:58ZdanAalborg UniversitetsforlagGlobe2246-88382019-11-01910.5278/ojs.globe.v9i.3521Crossing hierarchies in organizations: Making sense of employee dissent and circumvention on internal social mediaVibeke Thøis Madsen0Aalborg University This paper explores how and why visibility and persistence factors affect employee communication on internal social media (ISM) and influence organizational dissent. This study presents findings from a single case study conducted at a Danish bank. Discussions initiated by employees on ISM were studied for four months, and 24 employees were interviewed about their communication behavior and their perception of communication on ISM. The study found that employees would deliberately use the visibility of communication in the ISM arena to bring up issues that had been ignored by middle managers or support staff. Senior managers were perceived to watch the arena, influencing middle managers or other employees to respond. The efficacy of dissent therefore seemed to increase with the presence of ISM, especially when a post was perceived as well-formulated and an act of prosocial behavior. A new, unwritten rule, therefore, seemed to have emerged that dissent and even circumvention on ISM was acceptable when framed in a constructive manner and aired for the benefit of the organization. https://somaesthetics.aau.dk/index.php/globe/article/view/3521
collection DOAJ
language Danish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vibeke Thøis Madsen
spellingShingle Vibeke Thøis Madsen
Crossing hierarchies in organizations: Making sense of employee dissent and circumvention on internal social media
Globe
author_facet Vibeke Thøis Madsen
author_sort Vibeke Thøis Madsen
title Crossing hierarchies in organizations: Making sense of employee dissent and circumvention on internal social media
title_short Crossing hierarchies in organizations: Making sense of employee dissent and circumvention on internal social media
title_full Crossing hierarchies in organizations: Making sense of employee dissent and circumvention on internal social media
title_fullStr Crossing hierarchies in organizations: Making sense of employee dissent and circumvention on internal social media
title_full_unstemmed Crossing hierarchies in organizations: Making sense of employee dissent and circumvention on internal social media
title_sort crossing hierarchies in organizations: making sense of employee dissent and circumvention on internal social media
publisher Aalborg Universitetsforlag
series Globe
issn 2246-8838
publishDate 2019-11-01
description This paper explores how and why visibility and persistence factors affect employee communication on internal social media (ISM) and influence organizational dissent. This study presents findings from a single case study conducted at a Danish bank. Discussions initiated by employees on ISM were studied for four months, and 24 employees were interviewed about their communication behavior and their perception of communication on ISM. The study found that employees would deliberately use the visibility of communication in the ISM arena to bring up issues that had been ignored by middle managers or support staff. Senior managers were perceived to watch the arena, influencing middle managers or other employees to respond. The efficacy of dissent therefore seemed to increase with the presence of ISM, especially when a post was perceived as well-formulated and an act of prosocial behavior. A new, unwritten rule, therefore, seemed to have emerged that dissent and even circumvention on ISM was acceptable when framed in a constructive manner and aired for the benefit of the organization.
url https://somaesthetics.aau.dk/index.php/globe/article/view/3521
work_keys_str_mv AT vibekethøismadsen crossinghierarchiesinorganizationsmakingsenseofemployeedissentandcircumventiononinternalsocialmedia
_version_ 1724248049739366400