What’s Wrong in a Jump? Prediction and Validation of Splice Site Variants

Alternative splicing (AS) is a crucial process to enhance gene expression driving organism development. Interestingly, more than 95% of human genes undergo AS, producing multiple protein isoforms from the same transcript. Any alteration (e.g., nucleotide substitutions, insertions, and deletions) inv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giulia Riolo, Silvia Cantara, Claudia Ricci
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Methods and Protocols
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9279/4/3/62
id doaj-6ce6997482b54f3bab6aae42eeecedd8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6ce6997482b54f3bab6aae42eeecedd82021-09-26T00:47:35ZengMDPI AGMethods and Protocols2409-92792021-09-014626210.3390/mps4030062What’s Wrong in a Jump? Prediction and Validation of Splice Site VariantsGiulia Riolo0Silvia Cantara1Claudia Ricci2Department of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Sciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, ItalyDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Sciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, ItalyDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Sciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, ItalyAlternative splicing (AS) is a crucial process to enhance gene expression driving organism development. Interestingly, more than 95% of human genes undergo AS, producing multiple protein isoforms from the same transcript. Any alteration (e.g., nucleotide substitutions, insertions, and deletions) involving consensus splicing regulatory sequences in a specific gene may result in the production of aberrant and not properly working proteins. In this review, we introduce the key steps of splicing mechanism and describe all different types of genomic variants affecting this process (splicing variants in acceptor/donor sites or branch point or polypyrimidine tract, exonic, and deep intronic changes). Then, we provide an updated approach to improve splice variants detection. First, we review the main computational tools, including the recent Machine Learning-based algorithms, for the prediction of splice site variants, in order to characterize how a genomic variant interferes with splicing process. Next, we report the experimental methods to validate the predictive analyses are defined, distinguishing between methods testing RNA (transcriptomics analysis) or proteins (proteomics experiments). For both prediction and validation steps, benefits and weaknesses of each tool/procedure are accurately reported, as well as suggestions on which approaches are more suitable in diagnostic rather than in clinical research.https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9279/4/3/62alternative splicingsplicing sitessplice variantprediction toolsmachine learningexperimental validation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Giulia Riolo
Silvia Cantara
Claudia Ricci
spellingShingle Giulia Riolo
Silvia Cantara
Claudia Ricci
What’s Wrong in a Jump? Prediction and Validation of Splice Site Variants
Methods and Protocols
alternative splicing
splicing sites
splice variant
prediction tools
machine learning
experimental validation
author_facet Giulia Riolo
Silvia Cantara
Claudia Ricci
author_sort Giulia Riolo
title What’s Wrong in a Jump? Prediction and Validation of Splice Site Variants
title_short What’s Wrong in a Jump? Prediction and Validation of Splice Site Variants
title_full What’s Wrong in a Jump? Prediction and Validation of Splice Site Variants
title_fullStr What’s Wrong in a Jump? Prediction and Validation of Splice Site Variants
title_full_unstemmed What’s Wrong in a Jump? Prediction and Validation of Splice Site Variants
title_sort what’s wrong in a jump? prediction and validation of splice site variants
publisher MDPI AG
series Methods and Protocols
issn 2409-9279
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Alternative splicing (AS) is a crucial process to enhance gene expression driving organism development. Interestingly, more than 95% of human genes undergo AS, producing multiple protein isoforms from the same transcript. Any alteration (e.g., nucleotide substitutions, insertions, and deletions) involving consensus splicing regulatory sequences in a specific gene may result in the production of aberrant and not properly working proteins. In this review, we introduce the key steps of splicing mechanism and describe all different types of genomic variants affecting this process (splicing variants in acceptor/donor sites or branch point or polypyrimidine tract, exonic, and deep intronic changes). Then, we provide an updated approach to improve splice variants detection. First, we review the main computational tools, including the recent Machine Learning-based algorithms, for the prediction of splice site variants, in order to characterize how a genomic variant interferes with splicing process. Next, we report the experimental methods to validate the predictive analyses are defined, distinguishing between methods testing RNA (transcriptomics analysis) or proteins (proteomics experiments). For both prediction and validation steps, benefits and weaknesses of each tool/procedure are accurately reported, as well as suggestions on which approaches are more suitable in diagnostic rather than in clinical research.
topic alternative splicing
splicing sites
splice variant
prediction tools
machine learning
experimental validation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9279/4/3/62
work_keys_str_mv AT giuliariolo whatswronginajumppredictionandvalidationofsplicesitevariants
AT silviacantara whatswronginajumppredictionandvalidationofsplicesitevariants
AT claudiaricci whatswronginajumppredictionandvalidationofsplicesitevariants
_version_ 1716869785651773440