Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching dan Student Facilitator and Explaining Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika dengan Mengontrol Kemampuan Awal Siswa
The purpose of this study is to analyze: (1) mathematics learning outcomes between students who are taught using a reciprocal teaching learning model and those who are taught using a student facilitator model and explaining, after controlling students' initial abilities; (2) the interaction bet...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
LPPM Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Jurnal Kependidikan |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ojs.ikipmataram.ac.id/index.php/jurnalkependidikan/article/view/2536 |
id |
doaj-70ef05076b91451e8b6b3db611a47869 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-70ef05076b91451e8b6b3db611a478692021-05-02T18:23:52ZengLPPM Universitas Pendidikan MandalikaJurnal Kependidikan2442-76672020-07-016223825010.33394/jk.v6i2.25361898Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching dan Student Facilitator and Explaining Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika dengan Mengontrol Kemampuan Awal SiswaDodik Mulyono0As Elly S.1STKIP PGRI LubuklinggauSTKIP-PGRI LubuklinggauThe purpose of this study is to analyze: (1) mathematics learning outcomes between students who are taught using a reciprocal teaching learning model and those who are taught using a student facilitator model and explaining, after controlling students' initial abilities; (2) the interaction between the learning model and learning independence of mathematics learning outcomes. The research population was 30 students in each training. Data collection were performed using test questions in the form of multiple choice. This research was conducted quantitatively using quasi-experimental research method. Data analysis was performed with a 2x2 level covariance analysis technique. The results of hypothesis 1 prove that Ho was rejected with F-count = 4.47 higher than F-table (0.05; 1: 59) = 4.00. Hypothesis 2 results prove that Ho was rejected with F-count = 14.94 higher than F-table (0.01; 1: 59) = 7.08.http://ojs.ikipmataram.ac.id/index.php/jurnalkependidikan/article/view/2536reciprocal teaching, student facilitator and explaining |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dodik Mulyono As Elly S. |
spellingShingle |
Dodik Mulyono As Elly S. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching dan Student Facilitator and Explaining Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika dengan Mengontrol Kemampuan Awal Siswa Jurnal Kependidikan reciprocal teaching, student facilitator and explaining |
author_facet |
Dodik Mulyono As Elly S. |
author_sort |
Dodik Mulyono |
title |
Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching dan Student Facilitator and Explaining Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika dengan Mengontrol Kemampuan Awal Siswa |
title_short |
Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching dan Student Facilitator and Explaining Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika dengan Mengontrol Kemampuan Awal Siswa |
title_full |
Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching dan Student Facilitator and Explaining Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika dengan Mengontrol Kemampuan Awal Siswa |
title_fullStr |
Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching dan Student Facilitator and Explaining Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika dengan Mengontrol Kemampuan Awal Siswa |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching dan Student Facilitator and Explaining Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika dengan Mengontrol Kemampuan Awal Siswa |
title_sort |
pengaruh model pembelajaran reciprocal teaching dan student facilitator and explaining terhadap hasil belajar matematika dengan mengontrol kemampuan awal siswa |
publisher |
LPPM Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika |
series |
Jurnal Kependidikan |
issn |
2442-7667 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
The purpose of this study is to analyze: (1) mathematics learning outcomes between students who are taught using a reciprocal teaching learning model and those who are taught using a student facilitator model and explaining, after controlling students' initial abilities; (2) the interaction between the learning model and learning independence of mathematics learning outcomes. The research population was 30 students in each training. Data collection were performed using test questions in the form of multiple choice. This research was conducted quantitatively using quasi-experimental research method. Data analysis was performed with a 2x2 level covariance analysis technique. The results of hypothesis 1 prove that Ho was rejected with F-count = 4.47 higher than F-table (0.05; 1: 59) = 4.00. Hypothesis 2 results prove that Ho was rejected with F-count = 14.94 higher than F-table (0.01; 1: 59) = 7.08. |
topic |
reciprocal teaching, student facilitator and explaining |
url |
http://ojs.ikipmataram.ac.id/index.php/jurnalkependidikan/article/view/2536 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dodikmulyono pengaruhmodelpembelajaranreciprocalteachingdanstudentfacilitatorandexplainingterhadaphasilbelajarmatematikadenganmengontrolkemampuanawalsiswa AT asellys pengaruhmodelpembelajaranreciprocalteachingdanstudentfacilitatorandexplainingterhadaphasilbelajarmatematikadenganmengontrolkemampuanawalsiswa |
_version_ |
1721488996621615104 |