Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching dan Student Facilitator and Explaining Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika dengan Mengontrol Kemampuan Awal Siswa

The purpose of this study is to analyze: (1) mathematics learning outcomes between students who are taught using a reciprocal teaching learning model and those who are taught using a student facilitator model and explaining, after controlling students' initial abilities; (2) the interaction bet...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dodik Mulyono, As Elly S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: LPPM Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika 2020-07-01
Series:Jurnal Kependidikan
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ojs.ikipmataram.ac.id/index.php/jurnalkependidikan/article/view/2536
id doaj-70ef05076b91451e8b6b3db611a47869
record_format Article
spelling doaj-70ef05076b91451e8b6b3db611a478692021-05-02T18:23:52ZengLPPM Universitas Pendidikan MandalikaJurnal Kependidikan2442-76672020-07-016223825010.33394/jk.v6i2.25361898Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching dan Student Facilitator and Explaining Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika dengan Mengontrol Kemampuan Awal SiswaDodik Mulyono0As Elly S.1STKIP PGRI LubuklinggauSTKIP-PGRI LubuklinggauThe purpose of this study is to analyze: (1) mathematics learning outcomes between students who are taught using a reciprocal teaching learning model and those who are taught using a student facilitator model and explaining, after controlling students' initial abilities; (2) the interaction between the learning model and learning independence of mathematics learning outcomes. The research population was 30 students in each training. Data collection were performed using test questions in the form of multiple choice. This research was conducted quantitatively using quasi-experimental research method. Data analysis was performed with a 2x2 level covariance analysis technique. The results of hypothesis 1 prove that Ho was rejected with F-count = 4.47 higher than F-table (0.05; 1: 59) = 4.00. Hypothesis 2 results prove that Ho was rejected with F-count = 14.94 higher than F-table (0.01; 1: 59) = 7.08.http://ojs.ikipmataram.ac.id/index.php/jurnalkependidikan/article/view/2536reciprocal teaching, student facilitator and explaining
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dodik Mulyono
As Elly S.
spellingShingle Dodik Mulyono
As Elly S.
Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching dan Student Facilitator and Explaining Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika dengan Mengontrol Kemampuan Awal Siswa
Jurnal Kependidikan
reciprocal teaching, student facilitator and explaining
author_facet Dodik Mulyono
As Elly S.
author_sort Dodik Mulyono
title Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching dan Student Facilitator and Explaining Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika dengan Mengontrol Kemampuan Awal Siswa
title_short Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching dan Student Facilitator and Explaining Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika dengan Mengontrol Kemampuan Awal Siswa
title_full Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching dan Student Facilitator and Explaining Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika dengan Mengontrol Kemampuan Awal Siswa
title_fullStr Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching dan Student Facilitator and Explaining Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika dengan Mengontrol Kemampuan Awal Siswa
title_full_unstemmed Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching dan Student Facilitator and Explaining Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika dengan Mengontrol Kemampuan Awal Siswa
title_sort pengaruh model pembelajaran reciprocal teaching dan student facilitator and explaining terhadap hasil belajar matematika dengan mengontrol kemampuan awal siswa
publisher LPPM Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika
series Jurnal Kependidikan
issn 2442-7667
publishDate 2020-07-01
description The purpose of this study is to analyze: (1) mathematics learning outcomes between students who are taught using a reciprocal teaching learning model and those who are taught using a student facilitator model and explaining, after controlling students' initial abilities; (2) the interaction between the learning model and learning independence of mathematics learning outcomes. The research population was 30 students in each training. Data collection were performed using test questions in the form of multiple choice. This research was conducted quantitatively using quasi-experimental research method. Data analysis was performed with a 2x2 level covariance analysis technique. The results of hypothesis 1 prove that Ho was rejected with F-count = 4.47 higher than F-table (0.05; 1: 59) = 4.00. Hypothesis 2 results prove that Ho was rejected with F-count = 14.94 higher than F-table (0.01; 1: 59) = 7.08.
topic reciprocal teaching, student facilitator and explaining
url http://ojs.ikipmataram.ac.id/index.php/jurnalkependidikan/article/view/2536
work_keys_str_mv AT dodikmulyono pengaruhmodelpembelajaranreciprocalteachingdanstudentfacilitatorandexplainingterhadaphasilbelajarmatematikadenganmengontrolkemampuanawalsiswa
AT asellys pengaruhmodelpembelajaranreciprocalteachingdanstudentfacilitatorandexplainingterhadaphasilbelajarmatematikadenganmengontrolkemampuanawalsiswa
_version_ 1721488996621615104