Comparison of life cycle assessment for different volume polypropylene jars

When deciding what packaging is the most appropriate for a product there are many factors to be considered. One of them is the impact of the packaging on environment. In this work, life cycle inventory and life cycle assessment of two different volume packagings were compared. The data were colle...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Krkić Nevena M., Lazić Vera L., Šuput Danijela Z.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Technology, Novi Sad 2012-01-01
Series:Acta Periodica Technologica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1450-7188/2012/1450-71881243159K.pdf
id doaj-7408b568f101432a8746a65bb95c72c2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7408b568f101432a8746a65bb95c72c22020-11-25T00:28:55ZengFaculty of Technology, Novi SadActa Periodica Technologica1450-71882012-01-0120124315916710.2298/APT1243159KComparison of life cycle assessment for different volume polypropylene jarsKrkić Nevena M.Lazić Vera L.Šuput Danijela Z.When deciding what packaging is the most appropriate for a product there are many factors to be considered. One of them is the impact of the packaging on environment. In this work, life cycle inventory and life cycle assessment of two different volume packagings were compared. The data were collected on the types and amounts of materials and energy consumption in the process of packaging and distribution of hand cream packed in polypropylene jars of 200 and 350 mL. Life cycle inventory (LCI) and life cycle impact assessment (LCA) were calculated. It was found that the total mass flow was higher for the jars of 350 mL. After analyzing individual flows, it was found that in both cycles (polypropylene jars of 200 and 350 mL),the consumption of fresh water was a dominant flow. This fresh water flow is mostly (95%) consumed in the injection molding process of manufacturing jars from polypropylene granules. The LCA analysis showed no significant difference in global warming potential between different volume jars. The process that mostly affected global warming was the production of polypropylene jars from polypropylene granules by injection molding for both jar volumes. Judging by the global warming potential, there is no difference of the environmental impact between investigated jars, but considering the mass flow and water consumption, more environmental friendly were the 200 mL jars.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1450-7188/2012/1450-71881243159K.pdfLife cycle assessmentpolypropylenejarspackaging
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Krkić Nevena M.
Lazić Vera L.
Šuput Danijela Z.
spellingShingle Krkić Nevena M.
Lazić Vera L.
Šuput Danijela Z.
Comparison of life cycle assessment for different volume polypropylene jars
Acta Periodica Technologica
Life cycle assessment
polypropylene
jars
packaging
author_facet Krkić Nevena M.
Lazić Vera L.
Šuput Danijela Z.
author_sort Krkić Nevena M.
title Comparison of life cycle assessment for different volume polypropylene jars
title_short Comparison of life cycle assessment for different volume polypropylene jars
title_full Comparison of life cycle assessment for different volume polypropylene jars
title_fullStr Comparison of life cycle assessment for different volume polypropylene jars
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of life cycle assessment for different volume polypropylene jars
title_sort comparison of life cycle assessment for different volume polypropylene jars
publisher Faculty of Technology, Novi Sad
series Acta Periodica Technologica
issn 1450-7188
publishDate 2012-01-01
description When deciding what packaging is the most appropriate for a product there are many factors to be considered. One of them is the impact of the packaging on environment. In this work, life cycle inventory and life cycle assessment of two different volume packagings were compared. The data were collected on the types and amounts of materials and energy consumption in the process of packaging and distribution of hand cream packed in polypropylene jars of 200 and 350 mL. Life cycle inventory (LCI) and life cycle impact assessment (LCA) were calculated. It was found that the total mass flow was higher for the jars of 350 mL. After analyzing individual flows, it was found that in both cycles (polypropylene jars of 200 and 350 mL),the consumption of fresh water was a dominant flow. This fresh water flow is mostly (95%) consumed in the injection molding process of manufacturing jars from polypropylene granules. The LCA analysis showed no significant difference in global warming potential between different volume jars. The process that mostly affected global warming was the production of polypropylene jars from polypropylene granules by injection molding for both jar volumes. Judging by the global warming potential, there is no difference of the environmental impact between investigated jars, but considering the mass flow and water consumption, more environmental friendly were the 200 mL jars.
topic Life cycle assessment
polypropylene
jars
packaging
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1450-7188/2012/1450-71881243159K.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT krkicnevenam comparisonoflifecycleassessmentfordifferentvolumepolypropylenejars
AT lazicveral comparisonoflifecycleassessmentfordifferentvolumepolypropylenejars
AT suputdanijelaz comparisonoflifecycleassessmentfordifferentvolumepolypropylenejars
_version_ 1725333610198728704