Entering into dialogue with the taboo: Reflective writing in a social work human sexuality course

This paper examines a unique reflective writing assignment used in an undergraduate social work course on human sexuality. We ask what new understandings reflective writing mediates (Vygotsky, 1978) regarding sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender relations—oft-neglected topics within pre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Heather Killelea McEntarfer, David Skiba & Sarah A. Robert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SIG Writing of EARLI 2012-06-01
Series:Journal of Writing Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jowr.org/Ccount/click.php?id=50
id doaj-7705f4612e724c70bc6721b851dfa031
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7705f4612e724c70bc6721b851dfa0312020-11-24T22:58:56ZengSIG Writing of EARLIJournal of Writing Research 2030-10062012-06-014181105Entering into dialogue with the taboo: Reflective writing in a social work human sexuality courseHeather Killelea McEntarfer, David Skiba & Sarah A. RobertThis paper examines a unique reflective writing assignment used in an undergraduate social work course on human sexuality. We ask what new understandings reflective writing mediates (Vygotsky, 1978) regarding sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender relations—oft-neglected topics within pre-professional academic programs. One goal for this assignment was to mediate future social workers' abilities to differentiate between thoughts and feelings, and we evaluate the degree to which students did so in their writing. By adapting Hatton and Smith's (1994) framework for analyzing reflective writing, we also distinguish between descriptive and dialogical reflection, identifying and analyzing examples of both within the students' writing. Findings suggest that students engaged primarily in descriptive reflection, but also engaged in some dialogical reflection. We argue that both are useful but that the latter mediates deeper and more useful learning. We present recommendations for enhancing reflective writing assignment design in pre-professional academic programs.http://jowr.org/Ccount/click.php?id=50reflective writingantihomophobia worksocial workpre-professional programsassignment design
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Heather Killelea McEntarfer, David Skiba & Sarah A. Robert
spellingShingle Heather Killelea McEntarfer, David Skiba & Sarah A. Robert
Entering into dialogue with the taboo: Reflective writing in a social work human sexuality course
Journal of Writing Research
reflective writing
antihomophobia work
social work
pre-professional programs
assignment design
author_facet Heather Killelea McEntarfer, David Skiba & Sarah A. Robert
author_sort Heather Killelea McEntarfer, David Skiba & Sarah A. Robert
title Entering into dialogue with the taboo: Reflective writing in a social work human sexuality course
title_short Entering into dialogue with the taboo: Reflective writing in a social work human sexuality course
title_full Entering into dialogue with the taboo: Reflective writing in a social work human sexuality course
title_fullStr Entering into dialogue with the taboo: Reflective writing in a social work human sexuality course
title_full_unstemmed Entering into dialogue with the taboo: Reflective writing in a social work human sexuality course
title_sort entering into dialogue with the taboo: reflective writing in a social work human sexuality course
publisher SIG Writing of EARLI
series Journal of Writing Research
issn 2030-1006
publishDate 2012-06-01
description This paper examines a unique reflective writing assignment used in an undergraduate social work course on human sexuality. We ask what new understandings reflective writing mediates (Vygotsky, 1978) regarding sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender relations—oft-neglected topics within pre-professional academic programs. One goal for this assignment was to mediate future social workers' abilities to differentiate between thoughts and feelings, and we evaluate the degree to which students did so in their writing. By adapting Hatton and Smith's (1994) framework for analyzing reflective writing, we also distinguish between descriptive and dialogical reflection, identifying and analyzing examples of both within the students' writing. Findings suggest that students engaged primarily in descriptive reflection, but also engaged in some dialogical reflection. We argue that both are useful but that the latter mediates deeper and more useful learning. We present recommendations for enhancing reflective writing assignment design in pre-professional academic programs.
topic reflective writing
antihomophobia work
social work
pre-professional programs
assignment design
url http://jowr.org/Ccount/click.php?id=50
work_keys_str_mv AT heatherkilleleamcentarferdavidskibasaraharobert enteringintodialoguewiththetabooreflectivewritinginasocialworkhumansexualitycourse
_version_ 1725645985425653760