Approximating attractors of Boolean networks by iterative CTL model checking

This paper introduces the notion of approximating asynchronous attractors of Boolean networks by minimal trap spaces. We define three criteria for determining the quality of an approximation: faithfulness which requires that the oscillating variables of all attractors in a trapspace correspond to th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hannes eKlarner, Heike eSiebert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fbioe.2015.00130/full
id doaj-832e0c542337478689c9d33b6bd741d3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-832e0c542337478689c9d33b6bd741d32020-11-25T01:15:34ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology2296-41852015-09-01310.3389/fbioe.2015.00130142935Approximating attractors of Boolean networks by iterative CTL model checkingHannes eKlarner0Heike eSiebert1Freie Universität BerlinFreie Universität BerlinThis paper introduces the notion of approximating asynchronous attractors of Boolean networks by minimal trap spaces. We define three criteria for determining the quality of an approximation: faithfulness which requires that the oscillating variables of all attractors in a trapspace correspond to their dimensions, univocality which requires that there is a unique attractor in each trap space and completeness which requires that there are no attractors outside of a given set of trap spaces. Each is a reachability property for which we give equivalent model checking queries. Whereas faithfulness and univocality can be decided by model checking the corresponding subnetworks, the naive query for completeness must be evaluated on the full state space. Our main result is an alternative approach which is based on the iterative refinement of an initially poor approximation. The algorithm detects so-called autonomous sets in the interaction graph, variables that contain all their regulators, and considers their intersection and extension in order to perform model checking on the smallest possible state spaces. A benchmark, in which we apply the algorithm to 18 published Boolean networks, is given. In each case, the minimal trap spaces are faithful, univocal and complete which suggests that they are in general good approximations for the asymptotics of Boolean networks.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fbioe.2015.00130/fullattractorsgene regulationBoolean networksAsynchronous dynamicsCTL model checkingsignal transudction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hannes eKlarner
Heike eSiebert
spellingShingle Hannes eKlarner
Heike eSiebert
Approximating attractors of Boolean networks by iterative CTL model checking
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
attractors
gene regulation
Boolean networks
Asynchronous dynamics
CTL model checking
signal transudction
author_facet Hannes eKlarner
Heike eSiebert
author_sort Hannes eKlarner
title Approximating attractors of Boolean networks by iterative CTL model checking
title_short Approximating attractors of Boolean networks by iterative CTL model checking
title_full Approximating attractors of Boolean networks by iterative CTL model checking
title_fullStr Approximating attractors of Boolean networks by iterative CTL model checking
title_full_unstemmed Approximating attractors of Boolean networks by iterative CTL model checking
title_sort approximating attractors of boolean networks by iterative ctl model checking
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
issn 2296-4185
publishDate 2015-09-01
description This paper introduces the notion of approximating asynchronous attractors of Boolean networks by minimal trap spaces. We define three criteria for determining the quality of an approximation: faithfulness which requires that the oscillating variables of all attractors in a trapspace correspond to their dimensions, univocality which requires that there is a unique attractor in each trap space and completeness which requires that there are no attractors outside of a given set of trap spaces. Each is a reachability property for which we give equivalent model checking queries. Whereas faithfulness and univocality can be decided by model checking the corresponding subnetworks, the naive query for completeness must be evaluated on the full state space. Our main result is an alternative approach which is based on the iterative refinement of an initially poor approximation. The algorithm detects so-called autonomous sets in the interaction graph, variables that contain all their regulators, and considers their intersection and extension in order to perform model checking on the smallest possible state spaces. A benchmark, in which we apply the algorithm to 18 published Boolean networks, is given. In each case, the minimal trap spaces are faithful, univocal and complete which suggests that they are in general good approximations for the asymptotics of Boolean networks.
topic attractors
gene regulation
Boolean networks
Asynchronous dynamics
CTL model checking
signal transudction
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fbioe.2015.00130/full
work_keys_str_mv AT hanneseklarner approximatingattractorsofbooleannetworksbyiterativectlmodelchecking
AT heikeesiebert approximatingattractorsofbooleannetworksbyiterativectlmodelchecking
_version_ 1725152452160782336