Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase mutation in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck cancers: Myth or reality?

Purpose: The docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and cisplatin (TPF) regimen in India is associated with high percentages of Grade 3-4 toxicity. This analysis was planned to evaluate the incidence of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) mutation in patients with severe gastrointestinal toxicity, to a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vijay M Patil, Vanita Noronha, Amit Joshi, Saurabh Zanwar, Anant Ramaswamy, Supreeta Arya, Abhishek Mahajan, Atanu Bhattacharjee, Kumar Prabhash
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2016-01-01
Series:South Asian Journal of Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.sajc.org/article.asp?issn=2278-330X;year=2016;volume=5;issue=4;spage=182;epage=185;aulast=Patil
id doaj-8a459a246b0442ca953da78ce60c40bf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a459a246b0442ca953da78ce60c40bf2020-12-02T18:07:49ZengThieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.South Asian Journal of Cancer2278-330X2016-01-015418218510.4103/2278-330X.195338Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase mutation in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck cancers: Myth or reality?Vijay M PatilVanita NoronhaAmit JoshiSaurabh ZanwarAnant RamaswamySupreeta AryaAbhishek MahajanAtanu BhattacharjeeKumar PrabhashPurpose: The docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and cisplatin (TPF) regimen in India is associated with high percentages of Grade 3-4 toxicity. This analysis was planned to evaluate the incidence of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) mutation in patients with severe gastrointestinal toxicity, to assess whether the mutation could be predicted by a set of clinical criteria and whether it has any impact on postneoadjuvant chemotherapy response. Methods: All consecutive patients who received TPF regimen in head and neck cancers between January 2015 and April 2015 were selected. Patients who had predefined set of toxicities in Cycle 1 were selected for DPD mutation testing. Depending on the results, C2 doses were modified. Postcompletion of two cycles, patients underwent radiological response assessment. Descriptive statistics has been performed. The normally distributed continuous variables were compared by unpaired Student′s t-test, whereas variables which were not normally distributed by Wilcoxon sum rank test. For noncontinuous variables, comparison was performed by Fisher′s exact test. Results: Out of 34 patients, who received TPF, 12 were selected for DPD testing, and 11 (32.4%, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 19.1-49.3%) had DPD mutation. The predictive accuracy of the criteria for the tested DPD mutations was 81.3% (95% CI: 62.1-100%). Of the 11 DPD mutation positive patients, except for one patient, all others received the second cycle of TPF. The dose adjustments done in 5-FU were 50% dose reduction in 9 patients and no dose reduction in one patient. The response rate in DPD mutated patients was 27.3% (3/11) and that in DPD nonmutated/nontested was 39.1% (9/23) (P = 0.70). Conclusion: In this small study, it seems that the incidence of DPD mutation is more common in Indian then it′s in the Caucasian population. Clinical toxicity criteria can accurately predict for DPD mutation. Postdose adjustments of 5-FU from C2 onward, TPF can safely be delivered in the majority of patients with DPD heterozygous mutations without decrement in efficacy.http://journal.sajc.org/article.asp?issn=2278-330X;year=2016;volume=5;issue=4;spage=182;epage=185;aulast=Patil5-fluorouracildihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase mutationhead and neck cancersneoadjuvant chemotherapytoxicity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vijay M Patil
Vanita Noronha
Amit Joshi
Saurabh Zanwar
Anant Ramaswamy
Supreeta Arya
Abhishek Mahajan
Atanu Bhattacharjee
Kumar Prabhash
spellingShingle Vijay M Patil
Vanita Noronha
Amit Joshi
Saurabh Zanwar
Anant Ramaswamy
Supreeta Arya
Abhishek Mahajan
Atanu Bhattacharjee
Kumar Prabhash
Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase mutation in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck cancers: Myth or reality?
South Asian Journal of Cancer
5-fluorouracil
dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase mutation
head and neck cancers
neoadjuvant chemotherapy
toxicity
author_facet Vijay M Patil
Vanita Noronha
Amit Joshi
Saurabh Zanwar
Anant Ramaswamy
Supreeta Arya
Abhishek Mahajan
Atanu Bhattacharjee
Kumar Prabhash
author_sort Vijay M Patil
title Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase mutation in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck cancers: Myth or reality?
title_short Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase mutation in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck cancers: Myth or reality?
title_full Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase mutation in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck cancers: Myth or reality?
title_fullStr Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase mutation in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck cancers: Myth or reality?
title_full_unstemmed Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase mutation in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck cancers: Myth or reality?
title_sort dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase mutation in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck cancers: myth or reality?
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
series South Asian Journal of Cancer
issn 2278-330X
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Purpose: The docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and cisplatin (TPF) regimen in India is associated with high percentages of Grade 3-4 toxicity. This analysis was planned to evaluate the incidence of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) mutation in patients with severe gastrointestinal toxicity, to assess whether the mutation could be predicted by a set of clinical criteria and whether it has any impact on postneoadjuvant chemotherapy response. Methods: All consecutive patients who received TPF regimen in head and neck cancers between January 2015 and April 2015 were selected. Patients who had predefined set of toxicities in Cycle 1 were selected for DPD mutation testing. Depending on the results, C2 doses were modified. Postcompletion of two cycles, patients underwent radiological response assessment. Descriptive statistics has been performed. The normally distributed continuous variables were compared by unpaired Student′s t-test, whereas variables which were not normally distributed by Wilcoxon sum rank test. For noncontinuous variables, comparison was performed by Fisher′s exact test. Results: Out of 34 patients, who received TPF, 12 were selected for DPD testing, and 11 (32.4%, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 19.1-49.3%) had DPD mutation. The predictive accuracy of the criteria for the tested DPD mutations was 81.3% (95% CI: 62.1-100%). Of the 11 DPD mutation positive patients, except for one patient, all others received the second cycle of TPF. The dose adjustments done in 5-FU were 50% dose reduction in 9 patients and no dose reduction in one patient. The response rate in DPD mutated patients was 27.3% (3/11) and that in DPD nonmutated/nontested was 39.1% (9/23) (P = 0.70). Conclusion: In this small study, it seems that the incidence of DPD mutation is more common in Indian then it′s in the Caucasian population. Clinical toxicity criteria can accurately predict for DPD mutation. Postdose adjustments of 5-FU from C2 onward, TPF can safely be delivered in the majority of patients with DPD heterozygous mutations without decrement in efficacy.
topic 5-fluorouracil
dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase mutation
head and neck cancers
neoadjuvant chemotherapy
toxicity
url http://journal.sajc.org/article.asp?issn=2278-330X;year=2016;volume=5;issue=4;spage=182;epage=185;aulast=Patil
work_keys_str_mv AT vijaympatil dihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasemutationinneoadjuvantchemotherapyinheadandneckcancersmythorreality
AT vanitanoronha dihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasemutationinneoadjuvantchemotherapyinheadandneckcancersmythorreality
AT amitjoshi dihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasemutationinneoadjuvantchemotherapyinheadandneckcancersmythorreality
AT saurabhzanwar dihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasemutationinneoadjuvantchemotherapyinheadandneckcancersmythorreality
AT anantramaswamy dihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasemutationinneoadjuvantchemotherapyinheadandneckcancersmythorreality
AT supreetaarya dihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasemutationinneoadjuvantchemotherapyinheadandneckcancersmythorreality
AT abhishekmahajan dihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasemutationinneoadjuvantchemotherapyinheadandneckcancersmythorreality
AT atanubhattacharjee dihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasemutationinneoadjuvantchemotherapyinheadandneckcancersmythorreality
AT kumarprabhash dihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasemutationinneoadjuvantchemotherapyinheadandneckcancersmythorreality
_version_ 1724404399125561344